I cut out the section I wanted to reply to. I'm not sure why that's a problem for you.
He's below his peak. If you graphed the quality of the team by year you'd get a zig-zagging line.
(1) To be fair by two year's ago I meant year 4 which might more accurately be called last year, but whatever. Year 4 wasn't "unwatchable" on offense but it was still terrible. Year 3 was lolbad awful. But again, I do not care if we win games 3-0 or 100-97 and both coaches have achieved a respectable but mediocre win total. Greg Schiano has been at Rutgers for 16 years. Generally I will exempt a coach that takes over a bad program for 3 years. So that's 6 years that don't count. Greg Schiano has had one top 25 team in 10 tries. If that's not mediocre I don't know what is.
(2) You are arguing against things I'm not saying. I'm not saying you need to be on the Pike bandwagon. I'm saying it's weird that there are people who are enthusiastically on the Greg Schiano bandwagon who are also extremely far from the Pike bandwagon. This season has eliminated the people who are the opposite, but there have also been people who were enthusiastically on the Pike bandwagon who thought Greg was horrible. I find both these positions weird.
