ADVERTISEMENT

Greg Schiano knows what he wants in Rutgers football's next DC: 'Leadership is everything'

0:50- he had a great experience with the gymnastics coach!

Hard pass!!!!! 😉

Also from his wiki page: "On April 9, 2024, Nowinsky accepted the position of co-defensive coordinator and defensive line coach at Memphis."
No no “as” not with the gymnastics coach.

He was an amazing spotter!

Mortem by Lion - Aftermath pf RU v Purdue

Right now, the staff has not committed to allowing the best 6 to 7 players to play on the court, so they can get cohesion and used to how the others will anticipate plays happening.

The starting backcourt I envisioned after the portal additions and subtractions was.

Dylan Harper
Tyson Acuff
Ace Bailey
Dylan Grant
Lathan Sommerville

1st guard off the bench, JWill
2nd guard off the bench, Derkack
3rd guard off the bench, JMike
1st forward off the bench, Bryce Dortch
2nd forward off the bench, Martini
1st big man off bench-Ogbole
Hybrid forward/guard in specific situations PJ Hayes.

There are limited options to play well, because the guards are not good shooters or playmakers outside of Harper and Acuff.....JWill passes up more open shots than Mulcahy did, which is hard to do.

In terms of Derkack, he is the one player who should actually shoot open corner 3s....he keeps turning those shots down and driving into baseline, looking for foul calls and the refs have adjusted and refuse to call the fouls when Derkack is driving. It's almost as if the refs have been asked to swallow the whistle.....he is most negatively impacted by his inability to hit perimeter shots, so the drives are less frequent and don't appear to be bail out calls to send him to the line.

Ironically, the only path to success this year, is to burn Dortchs redshirt and commit to finding another wing defender and length guy, that can help on screen and rolls....it is a LOT to ask Bryce Dortch to climb over screens and alter a shot attempt of a Braden Smith, or John Blackwell (Wisconsin), John Tonje (Wisconsin).....we just started playing Grant and there should be TWO options to defend from the wing and paint, to help Dylan and Ace.

if you split 40 minutes of time between Dortch and Grant, I feel fairly certain we can find 12 to 13PPG and 8 rebounds between those two freshman.

16 PPG Bailey (14 shots)
16 PPG Harper (12 shots)
12 PPG Acuff (12 shots)
7 PPG Grant (6 shots)
7 PPG Sommerville (6 shots)
6 PPG Dortch (5 shots)
5 PPG (JWill/Derkack (6 shots)
3 PPG JMike/Ogbole/Hayes/Martini(5 shots)

RU is averaging around 65 shots a game, but the biggest problem isn't talent.....the rebounding and defense are issues....right now, it's empty possessions because of turnovers.

Derkack arrived with a HIGH turnover track record and that's translated exactly as it did at Merrimack.....JMike is not a shooter or playmaker, he's more of a bring the ball up and hope the defense makes a mistake if he drives to the hoop.....while being a below average FT shooter, it's difficult to find a solution by playing Derkack and JMike major minutes.

The ONLY option at this stage is to play Dortch and ask him to harass opposing guards like Loyer, Tonje and let him play on the wing as a guard. He has "some" guard tendencies on tape and if you're going to suffer with poor shooting, you might as well get better length and size on the perimeter and let Dortch play defense like Caleb McConnell did.

The 5 freshman will cut down on perimeter shots by opponents, help clean the glass and offer some offensive rebounding and size.

Anything short of 70 minutes from Dortch, Grant and Sommerville is a no chance to win formula on either end of the court, scoring, rebounding and defense.

Commit to these 5 freshman the rest of January and the results will be much more cohesive on defense and allow Acuff to find more shots and passing opportunities.....he has found Grant on lobs and dunks, two straight games, just on a simple curl to the foul line. If you add Dortch as an option on the court, they can find easy layups or shots at the rim.

Football Rutgers inks Kirk Ciarrocca to extension through 2027 season

55th in scoring offense, 71 total offense, 88 ypp...these aren't numbers where people are beating down your door.

That being said, the PSU misadventure wouldn't preclude him from bigger opportunities because people have short memories and it's what have you done lately...if by some chance we had an offense in the top 20s in these categories then his name can become hot again....careers can go up and down and down and up
Context: Rutgers averaged just under 30 ppg in 2024, a significant increase from 23 ppg in 2023. As for total offense, Rutgers went from 306 ypg to 384 ypg. Previously, Rutgers was in the bottom ten in total offense and has now climbed to the middle of the pack. Even a blind person can see a big jump in production. I guess the earth is flat. 🤣🤣

Rage research

Earned it may have been the wrong term. But what I mean is he has earned respect as a quality coach. There are not a ton of quality coaches that could or would step into this job. If you let him go, you better damn be sure you have the right replacement. There is zero chance that is happening with no president and no AD. So I will say it again… he has 2 years at minimum to fix it. He’s a good coach and I expect him to get it done.
I think the notion that Rutgers is an undesirable job is outdated too, especially after revenue sharing. Elite home-court, advantage, $$ to spend, low expectations, I think a lot of coaches would jump at that
  • Like
Reactions: DHajekRC84

A dose of reality?

Personally think you’re misreading the situation.

And this notion that Cliff is not living his best life at Bama compared to RU is not accurate. Cliff is getting exactly what he wanted.
And yet he looks miserable out there on the court. So did Myles. It’s not easy to go from needed to an afterthought.

I’m not suggesting he would’ve instead come here for free, I’m saying a proactive and deliberate effort could’ve been made to get Cliff whatever amount it would take to keep him here. I don’t know for sure, but it certainly didn’t seem like that was prioritized as there was no outward effort. It was smaller scale, but with Caleb Pike worked with him and found a way to get him paid. I think our fans would’ve put up the money to keep Cliff around for Dylan and Ace - if that was the clear objective. Contributing blindly in the hope of landing some unknown center is not the same thing. Much harder to get buy in.

OT: Belmar beach badge checkers don’t fool around

Are the year round police part of the beach budget? If so where do you imagine the majority of time is spent May-September.

I don't see how it would save time. Besides this has nothing to do with your complaint about rental rules/enforcement. New codes would be enacted by the council. The CEO can propose changes but can't enact unilaterally.

Here's what we're missing. Squan '25 is not the same town it was in '10 and not even in the same universe as when I was your age. There are more expensive homes, some year round, and less rentals. With that comes a different population. While some may not like it, the people who live and pay taxes here will make the decisions as long as they follow the laws set by the state and feds.

Unlike some, I have no issue with the vast majority of 'visitors" I worked in local bars, mostly part time, for over 20 years. Met a lot of great folks including a few members here. But times have changed and it ain't going back.

There's a lot of police and code officers (and not just DTS, btw) enforcing non-existent laws. So I would streamline and eliminate and consolidate a lot of positions.

It is way different and less rentals, I agree completely. Because of this, don't you think when you have so many more mostly vacant properties, there's a lot of overkill?

Also Gen Z don't drink like we do. Unless they're going on a Zyn bender or filming TikToks you guys have less to worry about them in that regard lol.

OT: DEVASTATING WILDFIRE ….Santa Monica/Palisades fire being aided by 50-80mph Santa Ana winds. 100mph possible overnight

Not really.

Talking about what can be done in the future is an important part of this. And finding out what when right or wrong, along who did what and when/why is too.

There is an adult way of doing that. We call it a critique in my profession. Usually happens pretty soon right after the event. More in-depth conversation/study happens later.
We called them "After Action Reviews." Same concept, presumably, using root cause analysis, 5 Whys, Failure Mode Effects Analysis, and other tools. And while there's certainly a dispassionate, reasoned, adult way of doing them, we're seeing very little of that in this thread, which is not unusual. We also typically did a condensed, fast version soon after the event where constructing a painstakingly detailed chronological "process map" of what happened was the first step, i.e., collecting all of the facts, data, and key decision points, while they were still fresh in everyone's minds.

For minor events where they often was one singular action or decision that was the root cause that was often enough, but for major events, a deeper dive later on was carried out where the team (and various sub-teams) dove into analysis of the state of the system prior to the event in an attempt to determine what systems and actions prior to the event contributed to it and also analyzing what actions and decisions during the event evaluating which of them could have been done better and which of them went well. For the analysis of the pre-event situation we used a tool common to the airline, chemical and other industries, called LOPA (layers of protection analysis) to evaluate whether the various systems in place to prevent such events functioned well or not and if there were key layers missing or key procedures not followed.

Whenever there's a catastrophic event in any industry or in the environment, typically there are multiple failures at multiple layers or key points involved, i.e., it's usually not something simplistic or obvious or one key thing, only. That's how the "Swiss Cheese Model" of accident/incident analysis, developed by James Reason in the 90s, as originally applied to aviation was developed and is in use in many industries now. Can be eye opening.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_cheese_model
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

OT: DEVASTATING WILDFIRE ….Santa Monica/Palisades fire being aided by 50-80mph Santa Ana winds. 100mph possible overnight

Not really.

Talking about what can be done in the future is an important part of this. And finding out what when right or wrong, along who did what and when/why is too.

There is an adult way of doing that. We call it a critique in my profession. Usually happens pretty soon right after the event. More in-depth conversation/study happens later.
this exactly. Most well run organizations do the same. We have investigations to determine root cause and ways to improve anytime any little thing goes off course, its a huge part of our operations.

Rutgers New Brunswick students release a 'terrorist-like' message to their school, demanding that the school cut ties with Israel.

She claims she was subjected to female genital mutilation and you claim she's lying? It happened when she was five. How do you know she lied about it? What do want for proof?

You didn't answer the question. What does she say about Sharia law that's wrong? Go ahead and keep questioning a woman who subjected to such a horrible procedure, but it doesn't change the facts:

1. Sharia law is evil
2. Hamas is evil
3. There would be no war if Hamas didn't attack
4. Israel is a democracy

Since you're so concerned with what time I post, I'm posting earlier today because there's nothing on TV except a football game where I equally hate both teams and I don't give a Damm who wins.

She lied about everything. That's the problem. People don't usually just lie about one thing. How do you know she's truthful.

She said she lived under Sharia law. Kenya has Sharia law?

Keep parroting propaganda, it doesn't change the facts:

1. Netanyahu and Ben Gvir are evil
2. There would be no 10/7 and no war if Netanyahu didn't fund Hamas and actually focused on security rather than protecting American citizen settler violent terrorist lunatics in the West Bank
3. Israel has bombed churches, aid workers and its own civilians
4. Israel has killed multiple innocent American citizens, including a Christian journalist and a grandpa
5. Bombing churches and killing Americans and Israelis doesn't stop Sharia law or Hamas
6. Israel isn't a democracy
7. Hirsi Ali never, ever, lived under Sharia law or fled it in any way
8. You claimed a British born right wing pundit, Raheem Kassam, who was an aide for the leader of anti-Semitic UKIP Nigel Farage, fled Sharia law and provided no proof and have only exposed yourself.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT