Like some on the board, I was not in favor of Schiano 2.0; thought his warts - ego, mgmt style, resulting staff turnover, schemes, personnel usage, player development, etc - would be too difficult to overcome...particularly in the B1G East.
Time will tell, as GS is here to stay for the foreseeable future, but I just don't see him successfully competing, particularly now with the new NIL / free agency portal landscape. Even with an increase in NIL funding, I anticipate GS would continue to underperform recruit / transfer rankings - for the reasons mentioned above. My hope when GS was hired was a new indoor practice facility and a reasonably respectable program that an offensive-minded coach would take over...and then hopefully take the next step.
With the above now seemingly in doubt...I think the AD and collectives should prioritize the programs that have proven that they're able to produce more with less. I'm certainly not advocating that the AD bleed the football program - I know FB drives the bus and is the primary reason we're in the B1G. But since the magical 2006 season, GS has tended to produce less with more - relative to other RU programs. In fairness to GS or any affordable FB coach, the B1G lift may just be too heavy.
Men's basketball and many of the Olympic Sports have had multiple magical seasons. I'd like to see them provided the resources necessary to produce more with more - very possible, as the collectives gain traction and our conference share increases to a full share I believe in 2027. Go RU!