And Cam as a 3rd option will be tough.Fernandes and Griffiths are clearly scorers
I'm excited. This team is going to be different.
And Cam as a 3rd option will be tough.Fernandes and Griffiths are clearly scorers
Everyone wants Paul to score more, but the more/better scorers we have, the less important the need for Paul to score isTrue but Simpson has proven to be a better scorer than Paul. Worse case they split minutes but no way Paul should play more. After 4 years playing with multiple players his production has been capped at below 10 PPG. Not going to cut it if you want to return to the NCAA’s.
Everyone wants Paul to score more, but the more/better scorers we have, the less important the need for Paul to score is
What if his assist numbers go up?
Cam took just under 5 threes a game last year.Who will attempt the most 3s for us this coming year? Cam first. Then it’s debatable but likely Fernandes and Griffiths if not the next 2 they will both be in our top 4.
(All I know about Gavin is he’s highly rated and shooting accuracy is 1 of his strengths.)
Going out on a small limb and saying at least 3 of our top 4 three point shot attempters will shoot 36%+ from 3 next year.
When was the last time this happened? Paul’s skill set in the half court game can certainly work with 2 legit 3 pt shooters out there with him.
Cam Griffiths and Fernandes the likely top 3 for attempts and percentage which is a great thingWho will attempt the most 3s for us this coming year? Cam first. Then it’s debatable but likely Fernandes and Griffiths if not the next 2 they will both be in our top 4.
(All I know about Gavin is he’s highly rated and shooting accuracy is 1 of his strengths.)
Going out on a small limb and saying at least 3 of our top 4 three point shot attempters will shoot 36%+ from 3 next year.
When was the last time this happened? Paul’s skill set in the half court game can certainly work with 2 legit 3 pt shooters out there with him.
Combine the percentage boost with a PG and a big wing that hunt them and will take them in a variety of ways - transition, off the dribble, off a pick etc. It's going to be fun.Our team 3% is going to take a significant jump up from a lowly 32% this season. Our 2nd and 3rd most attempts came from shooters below a poor team average. We should be more like a top 5 three point shooting team in the B1G next year with 36% or possibly better team average
Everyone wants Paul to score more, but the more/better scorers we have, the less important the need for Paul to score is
What if his assist numbers go up?
He averaged 5.3 apg with Ron and Geo and 4.9 this year. Not meaningfully different but the offense struggled because of lack of scorers, lack of playmakers and lack of speed to run the break. The more players with those attributes we can get into the lineup the more productive the offense will be. Both of Paul’s double digit assist games were losses last year, not because of lack of assists but lack of scoring. Players that play 32 mpg can’t live on assists alone.Everyone wants Paul to score more, but the more/better scorers we have, the less important the need for Paul to score is
What if his assist numbers go up?
Ideally with better offensive options, we see less Cliff post ups but more space for him rolling to the rim and getting lobs1st Team B1G: Cliff (if he comes back)
You heard it here first. I think with Noah, Cam, Gavin in the perimeter, defenders will be hesitant to come down to double team Cliff.
I think Cliff will really really dedicate himself this off season and get his mid-jumper and back to the basket right.
Im saying 16-17pts with 11rebounds.
Will be a terror on the defensive side, which will land him finalist as DPOY
yea definitely see Cliff having more room to work with. Pick and roll. cutting to the room. I think this offense will open up big with inside and outside. Defense cant really lock/double on one player.Ideally with better offensive options, we see less Cliff post ups but more space for him rolling to the rim and getting lobs
You're not looking at the entire picture. From what I see in your post, your focus is on one piece of the puzzle. On an individual basis, it might not be great, but collectively it's way better. The idea is to place a player alongside another player where they highlight each other's strengths. This way, any deficiencies are not as pronounced.If Paul only averaged 9ppg with Ron and Geo why would he do better with Fernandes? If Paul’s playing 32 mpg and still averaging sub 10 PPG this is an NIT team again. He’s got to be producing over 12 PPG minimum (which he’s never done before) or his minutes need to be cut. This team needs scorers badly.
Thank you - the last thing we want is more post ups and mid-range shots from CliffIdeally with better offensive options, we see less Cliff post ups but more space for him rolling to the rim and getting lobs
I look at it more as the third guard - Pike seems to go 3 guards most of the time (at least last season)It isn't "Paul v Simpson" anymore. That is what many is missing.
That is done. Simpsons problem is Fernandes now - not Mulcahy.
It's "Paul v Griffiths v Mag v Ndongo v Hyatt" for the majority of minutes at the 2 forward spots.
Paul isn't playing most of his minutes with Griffiths, Cam and Fernandes. Unless he's playing over Mag and Ndongo.
Note: Or whoever replaces Ndongo on the roster.
So I guess if it’s your option it’s well informed… got it. Are you focusing on the big picture or just “court vision” and assists. Having a group of 5 stars playing with you and I would make us look better than playing in a YMCA pickup game but that doesn’t mean we should be on a D1 hoop team. If the goal is to keep elevating the program to become a regular NCAA team and maybe win a game or two, the talent needs to keep evolving. Can Paul take a defender off the dribble? Can he run the break well? Is he a plus defender? Does he not make panic turnovers when pressured? We need more players that can do those things … need to look big picture here.You're not looking at the entire picture. From what I see in your post, your focus is on one piece of the puzzle. On an individual basis, it might not be great, but collectively it's way better. The idea is to place a player alongside another player where they highlight each other's strengths. This way, any deficiencies are not as pronounced.
To win in sports is about playing to your strengths while minimizing your weaknesses. Adding Fernandez and Gavin should add to Rutgers' abilities to score more consistently while highlighting Pual's court vision. Some guys couldn't finish bunny shots and that made the passer look like an incompetent distributor and that led to this narrative of Paul having to go.
As I said before on this board perception is a dangerous thing in the hands of someone ill-informed. The world is flat. 🤣
Everyone is entitled to an opinion. The difference is some have merits to them based on experience and knowledge. Most listen when posters like RU72, bac2therac, or BKIn118 have something to say. Anyway, you are the one who is missing the point. You don't need five superstars for the team to succeed. Example: Randle of the NY Knicks is a solid player, but everyone was critical of his play at times because he tried to do everything by himself. In steps, Brunson, Randle's game has suddenly grown to another level. The same critics of Randle said Brunson is an average PG, but somehow the two together have taken the Knicks to another level, and both are now considered part of the upper echelon of the NBA.So I guess if it’s your option it’s well informed… got it. Are you focusing on the big picture or just “court vision” and assists. Having a group of 5 stars playing with you and I would make us look better than playing in a YMCA pickup game but that doesn’t mean we should be on a D1 hoop team. If the goal is to keep elevating the program to become a regular NCAA team and maybe win a game or two, the talent needs to keep evolving. Can Paul take a defender off the dribble? Can he run the break well? Is he a plus defender? Does he not make panic turnovers when pressured? We need more players that can do those things … need to look big picture here.
Seems like nobody has an answer on either him or Davis?So is Ndongo signing with us?
Davis is expected to sign this weekSeems like nobody has an answer on either him or Davis?
We were told Davis is gathering his family together and making the signing to RU an event. Don’t know the dateSeems like nobody has an answer on either him or Davis?
Davis- yesSeems like nobody has an answer on either him or Davis?
We do know the date😉Davis is expected to sign this week
NO!Everyone is entitled to an opinion. The difference is some have merits to them based on experience and knowledge. Most listen when posters like RU72, bac2therac, or BKIn118 have something to say. Anyway, you are the one who is missing the point. You don't need five superstars for the team to succeed. Example: Randle of the NY Knicks
🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
Everyone is entitled to an opinion. The difference is some have merits to them based on experience and knowledge. Most listen when posters like RU72, bac2therac, or BKIn118 have something to say. Anyway, you are the one who is missing the point. You don't need five superstars for the team to succeed. Example: Randle of the NY Knicks is a solid player, but everyone was critical of his play at times because he tried to do everything by himself. In steps, Brunson, Randle's game has suddenly grown to another level. The same critics of Randle said Brunson is an average PG, but somehow the two together have taken the Knicks to another level, and both are now considered part of the upper echelon of the NBA.
🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
Why did you cut off the rest of the thread?
Excellent analysis and well written.Everyone is entitled to an opinion. The difference is some have merits to them based on experience and knowledge. Most listen when posters like RU72, bac2therac, or BKIn118 have something to say. Anyway, you are the one who is missing the point. You don't need five superstars for the team to succeed. Example: Randle of the NY Knicks is a solid player, but everyone was critical of his play at times because he tried to do everything by himself. In steps, Brunson, Randle's game has suddenly grown to another level. The same critics of Randle said Brunson is an average PG, but somehow the two together have taken the Knicks to another level, and both are now considered part of the upper echelon of the NBA.
To translate that to Rutgers, look at the last two years with Paul and his play. When Paul played off the ball, away from being the primary ballhandler, he had great success. Paul isn't going to "wow" with dribbling skills, but he has an unbelievable vision to hit his teammates in the shooting pocket off a dribble or two during an offensive set. And this was when Geo was the primary ballhandler. Newsflash, Paul led the B1G in assist. Fast forward to this year, Paul was the primary ballhandler, and not only did the offense suffer, but so did his game. At this level, Paul isn't built to bring the ball up the court with someone harassing him. By the end of the season, Pike inserted Simpson, and Paul's court vision and assist game improved, but that lack of scorers to pass to didn't help. Pike understands this, which is why Fernandez and Gavin suddenly become essential. This gives Rutgers scorers similar to what they had two years ago. With Paul back off the ball, it's reasonable to think Paul will return to the level of success he experienced with Geo and Harper.
Paul is not a great on-the-ball defender, but with teammates like Simpson or Mag, who can take the best ballhandlers and defend them, then Paul can play like Cam. That is using his high basketball IQ and play the passing lane. Paul, like Cam, has a sense of what the opposing team's offense wants to do, and he can play off his man and create steals due to the pressure put on the ballhandlers by his teammates.
profusely.You started talking about the NBA.
@Greene Rice FIG started bleeding from the eyes and stopped reading.
😉
My badprofusely.
I will say role players are very important in the success of most teams in most sports.
You are partially forgiven. I do think you guys are warped for liking games with 90 3 point shots taken.My bad
I don’t really understand Paul’s role aside from giving someone a breather off the bench. If we have better scorers, we have to play those players.
Edey is coming back, so very unlikely Cliff is 1st team, and if Dickinson goes to Maryland, he might be third team again.1st Team B1G: Cliff (if he comes back)
You heard it here first. I think with Noah, Cam, Gavin in the perimeter, defenders will be hesitant to come down to double team Cliff.
I think Cliff will really really dedicate himself this off season and get his mid-jumper and back to the basket right.
Im saying 16-17pts with 11rebounds.
Will be a terror on the defensive side, which will land him finalist as DPOY
100%. There are folks on this board waaayyy overrating his contributions to the team. Is Paul an easy player to root for, absolutely. Is he a player that should be playing 30 plus minutes on an NCAA caliber team? Absolutely not.I don’t really understand Paul’s role aside from giving someone a breather off the bench. If we have better scorers, we have to play those players.
Cam, Simpson, Noah, MagWe had 3 years worth of rosters filled with better scorers in them than Paul (excluding this last one). Next year’s roster is not penciled in to have better scorers than Paul’s second team. Junior JY was likely as good or a better scorer than Noah will be. You think Simpson will be a better scorer next year than senior Geo Baker? Highly unlikely. RHJ was a better scorer than anyone on our roster will be next year. GG hasn’t played a minute of college ball and you think he’s coming in and matching Ron’s junior season numbers as a frosh? Come on. So next year’s team will have another sharp shooter in Cam but Caleb took up a slot on Paul’s second team playing for his defense (or when Tez was hot he played - regardless that slot was filled so it didn’t contain extra PT for Paul). He played 27+ min that year…
He didn’t run the point with JY and Geo either. And he’s a more efficient shooter than Derek and a better rebounder anyway. Derek is a better transition player and in iso.Cam, Simpson, Noah, Mag
All better scorers than Paul. Gavin will be too.
He’s not running point like he did in the past. We don’t need a 3/4 who can pass the ball.