ADVERTISEMENT

BACATOLOGY: NCAA TOURNAMENT ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR 3/6 PAGE 23

Michigan State has lost 7 of its last 9. They could fall. So could Xavier, who has lost 7 of their last 8 and Creighton and other dropping teams. None of those three are etched in stone.
We have already made a mockery of the NET.
 
Last edited:
Because it’s weak to pad your win totals and offset conference losses with jv opponents, regardless of your own conference’s quality.
Not when your Conference is as good as any in the land and you play a 20 game season. Through in a Seton Hall and at least one other Big East game and one ACC team. SOS as a whole is fine.
 
Because it’s weak to pad your win totals and offset conference losses with jv opponents, regardless of your own conference’s quality. And losing those games is a bad look, obviously.
But that would impact your overall SOS.

Non-conference SOS is yet another way for people to think too hard about something that doesn't need to be that complicated.
 
I posted the stat I think in this thread, the play ins have actually done fairly well
They've done better than expected at 15-15 but you still need to play an extra game. Even if we accept that play-ins somehow have an advantage in the 2nd game (and the sample size is way too small to really believe that imo) the extra game is still a huge disadvantage.

If a normal team as a 50% chance of winning the R64 and a play-in team has a 60% chance.. then they play-in team still has only a 30% chance of making R32 vs the 50% for a normal team.
 
RU has little chance of moving beyond a 9, MSU is at worst a 9

Big 10 standing mean zero and they mean even less than zero when RU has a net of 75 vs a net of 40-45 for msu and they have decent wins too
Not because we’re ahead in the standings. Because what it would mean is that against the same competition (actually unbalanced with RU playing more harder teams twice overall) we would’ve won 2 more games than them. Why should those 2 extra wins be less important than their wins over UConn and Loyola? If we won a neutral first round game in the BIG tourney and they lost - couldn’t you view our win as the Rider replacement game in our SOS? We’d then match them in the win column too. In that scenerio I’d think our seeds would be pretty similar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skull83
That seems a little extreme. Hypothetically, if they lost Sunday and we won, we’d be 2 games ahead of them in the BIG standings and tied with them in the total loss column. Now I understand that they played a harder OOC but they also played an easier unbalanced conference schedule (no Purdue the second time). And 2 games against 4 of the 5 bottom ranked teams. I would think if we then went on to win a game in the BIG and they lost - we’d be in similar seed territory. If we won 2 we’d possibly be ahead? Can’t imagine 3 wins in the tourney would be required.
MSU getting lucky with their B1G schedule is the only reason they are going to the dance. If their 2 games weren't all against the bottom of the conference they would have a couple more losses
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSAL_Hoops
MSU getting lucky with their B1G schedule is the only reason they are going to the dance. If their 2 games weren't all against the bottom of the conference they would have a couple more losses
They are getting saved in the conference SOS computer numbers because they didn’t play Nebraska twice. That’s why I hate blended averages. They played everyone else with 7 or less conference wins two times. We played the top 3 teams in the conference 2 times.
 
Michigan is very much in the danger Zone at 10-9/16-13

At Ohio state on Sunday

A loss there has them 10-10/16-14 facing Indiana in the 8/9 game ….loser is going home to
The NIT

And even if Michigan beats Indiana there…a loss to Wisconsin makes them 11-11/17-15

They really need to beat Ohio state to be out of the “big trouble zone “…much like we need to beat PSU
I don’t see Michigan getting in unless they beat Ohio St or go to finals in BIG1G tournament
 
This is simple
20 wins -lock

19 wins-
19-13.most likely in if the mid majors don’t have upsets that take away bids
19-14…a Penn state loss , then a Michigan or Indiana win and then a Wisconsin win gets us most likely in , unless mid majors have upsets that takes bid away

18-13…(beat PSU and lose to northwestern or Minnesota ). Big .trouble , on pins and needles

18-13…(beat PSU, get double bye , lose to Iowa )….trouble , on pins and needles
Disagree I think if we beat Penn State we are definitely in no matter the outcome of BIG1G tournament
 
Why do people say things like this? Having to play an extra game reduces your chances of making any subsequent round by ~50%
I'm with you. The data indicate it doesn't hurt those teams' chances in the round of 64 if you get that far. Half of those teams cannot make it to the round of 64. We have fans nervous about beating Penn State at the RAC on Senior Day with our bubble hopes on the line, yet a game in Dayton is no big deal?
 
I'm with you. The data indicate it doesn't hurt those teams' chances in the round of 64 if you get that far. Half of those teams cannot make it to the round of 64. We have fans nervous about beating Penn State at the RAC on Senior Day with our bubble hopes on the line, yet a game in Dayton is no big deal?
Penn state may be as good as that play in opponent.

I do agree with your premise.
 
They've done better than expected at 15-15 but you still need to play an extra game. Even if we accept that play-ins somehow have an advantage in the 2nd game (and the sample size is way too small to really believe that imo) the extra game is still a huge disadvantage.

If a normal team as a 50% chance of winning the R64 and a play-in team has a 60% chance.. then they play-in team still has only a 30% chance of making R32 vs the 50% for a normal team.
that extra game means the jitters are out, im not saying its something you actively want, but I dont think its a negative at all for advancing and history shows its not an impediment given you are one of the last seeded teams in anyhow, you are expected to lose
 
I'm with you. The data indicate it doesn't hurt those teams' chances in the round of 64 if you get that far. Half of those teams cannot make it to the round of 64. We have fans nervous about beating Penn State at the RAC on Senior Day with our bubble hopes on the line, yet a game in Dayton is no big deal?
Sample size isn’t large enough to be too confident. I do think there may be something to getting the nerves out
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg
They've done better than expected at 15-15 but you still need to play an extra game. Even if we accept that play-ins somehow have an advantage in the 2nd game (and the sample size is way too small to really believe that imo) the extra game is still a huge disadvantage.

If a normal team as a 50% chance of winning the R64 and a play-in team has a 60% chance.. then they play-in team still has only a 30% chance of making R32 vs the 50% for a normal team.
Depends on how you judge NCAA success. If you want to make a deep run, it
might be better to be a 12 seed. You can make the sweet 16 by beating a 12 seed, a 5 seed and a 4 seed. If you are the 7-10 see you would need to knock off a 1 or 2 to make the Sweet 16.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mugrat86
They are getting saved in the conference SOS computer numbers because they didn’t play Nebraska twice. That’s why I hate blended averages. They played everyone else with 7 or less conference wins two times. We played the top 3 teams in the conference 2 times.


and we also reap rewards of that...we knocked off the top 3 schools and we picked up 2 wins against a bottom feeder
 
MSU getting lucky with their B1G schedule is the only reason they are going to the dance. If their 2 games weren't all against the bottom of the conference they would have a couple more losses
they took care of business, did Rutgers, if they did they would be in already
 
Bac , you think a Penn state win and a bad loss on Thursday we are in Dayton ?
what is a bad loss..if you are in the double bye playing Iowa as our first game, its not a bad loss. Yes if we are 5 and lose to Northwestern then Dayton probably awaits....hopefully at that point
 
Not when your Conference is as good as any in the land and you play a 20 game season. Through in a Seton Hall and at least one other Big East game and one ACC team. SOS as a whole is fine.
I’m on the fence. Anyone who know anything says we need to schedule harder OOC.

However, Michigan is on the other end of that spectrum. They scheduled 6 relatively serious OOC games and lost 4 of them, and now they’re on the bubble because of a high loss total.

We scheduled 3 relatively serious OOC games, lost 2 and also lost to 2 cupcakes and are on the bubble because of it.

I’m not saying to keep the schedule the same, but I am saying we’re traumatized because we lost to cupcakes. If we’d just taken care of business we’d be locks.

Id say replace one, MAX two cupcakes with real opponents going forward.
 
what is a bad loss..if you are in the double bye playing Iowa as our first game, its not a bad loss. Yes if we are 5 and lose to Northwestern then Dayton probably awaits....hopefully at that point
Yes bad loss would be us as a 5 losing to a double digit seed.
 
no they are not, its a pretty strong resume hurt by the loss total
So then it’s not a strong resume if your loss total
when schools like Michigan and Rutgers have high loss totals, yes it effects the overall profile and its get dinged..see Oklahoma at 16-14 as well.
no doubt in my mind that unless Michigan beats Ohio St and we lose to Penn State that we get in over them. (Provided Michigan doesn’t go to finals of BIG1G tournament)
 
agree here.

Michigan also not only needs to beat OSU but will need a 2nd win in the Big 10 tourney, perhaps a third but 18-14 might be enough

RU at 19-13 is clearly ahead of Michigan at 18-14
 
I’m on the fence. Anyone who know anything says we need to schedule harder OOC.

However, Michigan is on the other end of that spectrum. They scheduled 6 relatively serious OOC games and lost 4 of them, and now they’re on the bubble because of a high loss total.

We scheduled 3 relatively serious OOC games, lost 2 and also lost to 2 cupcakes and are on the bubble because of it.

I’m not saying to keep the schedule the same, but I am saying we’re traumatized because we lost to cupcakes. If we’d just taken care of business we’d be locks.

Id say replace one, MAX two cupcakes with real opponents going forward.
inexcusable for them to lose at home to Central Florida thats the screw up there and also an early big 10 loss I think at home to Minnesota.

Its just the sos OOC mark is really bad, Wake and Indiana have bad ones too, Iowa as well but they are playing the metrics by winning by alot. You dont need to be as good as Michigan and truthfully if its around 150 thats not too bad either because the overall sos will still always be somewhere in the top 50 as a big 10 program.

schedule less 300 plus and get some neutral site games
 
If Rutgers beats Penn State Sunday, it will guarantee a 6th place regular season finish in league and could possibly be 5th or 4th. When was the last time a BIG1G team was left out of the tournament with a top 6 finish. Does anybody know? I am rather certain it has never been done with a top 5 finish and pretty certain never been done with top 6 finish
 
Because it’s weak to pad your win totals and offset conference losses with jv opponents
I disagree. The majority of CBB is played in "JV" conferences yet a high win total with a weak SOS is often rewarded. Two quality wins and you are in the tourney. Murray state and South Dakota have 200+ SOS ranks. Davidson is 138th and N. Texas is 155th yet all these teams have 23 or more wins and are at least on the bubble.

It makes no sense to say the team that plays the #2 SOS in the nation but "only" wins 14 is out but the team that plays the 259th SOS and wins 28th is in regardless of whether their weakest opponents were in their conference or not.

I think I am in the minority but Pikes idea of playing a weak OOC and still finishing with a 30th ranked SOS makes perfect sense to me. The only flaw in the system is if you lose to a Lafayette, but frankly, I will take my chances on getting 6-8 easy wins early and padding my resume. If we had won those 3 easy OOC games, we would be a lock right now.
 
Nebraska finished 5th a few years back but they had no quality wins, would not be a good comparison

Consider though right now in the ACC only Duke is a lock and that the 2nd and 3rd place teams have 20 wins and so does the 4th and they are not locks at all
 
Wait so we want Michigan to beat Ohio state or not ?


so our game with Penn State will be over first, I think there game is at 1230 so we can adapt

if we want Michigan to not compete with us for a bid then yeah its good for them to lose, if we want the bye then yes root for them to win. There is enough room for both RU and Michigan to make it in
 
so our game with Penn State will be over first, I think there game is at 1230 so we can adapt

if we want Michigan to not compete with us for a bid then yeah its good for them to lose, if we want the bye then yes root for them to win. There is enough room for both RU and Michigan to make it in
I know the committee doesn’t care much about big ten standings but I can’t see a scenario where they leave out Rutgers if they finish in 4th place. RU owns the tie breaker over all the other tourney teams because they beat them all.
 
In a perfect world, yes. But even if we win we are still competing with Michigan, so I want them to lose.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT