There are terrible arguments littered throughout the thread.
A national title contender is the only barometer for a conference?? Should we bow down to the AAC or WCC, just because Gonzaga and Houston have made the Final Four recently??
How long are we going to prop up the Big East, just because Nova won 2 NCs?? I am waiting to see the annual Big East love affair post come Big East Tournament time??
The B1G doesn't typically land 1 and done talents and certainly doesn't out "NIL", some of the SEC or Big 12 schools like Kansas.
I hate to tell people that Northwestern and Nebraska have greatly improved their defense from last year to this year, because it doesn't fit the narrative for some fans and that means there's no dominant teams running wild like UConn will in the Big East or Houston in the AAC or the Zags on 2 month vacation now in their improving but still non-existent league.
Anyone putting all of their evaluation eggs in the basket of a randomly selected Tournament that adds 25 non Power 5 programs no one keeps track of, good luck with that. I'm sure we all know who the best players are in the Ohio Valley conference today.
And yes there are phantom fans looking to explain RUs relevancy and improvements, based on the "decline of the B1G". Meanwhile, entire programs being built on cupcakes like Gonzaga are OK, but let's not give RU credit. Let's give Gonzaga and Houston credit for the next 2 months of play, cruising through their leagues to an easier seed/path.
Happy New Year and Go RU.....waiting for the goalposts to be moved again, they'll be moved from Piscataway to Route 287 by March 2025, to explain away the next 2 to 3 years.