Last year's team loses this game by 40. EJ coaching this year, meh, 30.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I said thirty in other threads but you're right. Pikiell and staff is miles and miles above anything we've had here in a generation.Last year's team loses this game by 40. EJ coaching this year, meh, 30.
Bottom Line: Cover. 5-1 ATS.
No but honestly If Corey and Williams look to shoot more, more so Corey (Williams will get his 3 looks), it'll go a long way towards creating space for the rest of the offense to work with.
My biggest take away: Our guards will not hurt us defensively because what they give up on the length they make up in pressure. They'll be liabilities on defense in half court when we don't defend screens well but they're no Mack from a liability stand point.
Yes. This team is light years better than last year's team. Especially true when one sees our HC and staff.I think it is time to retire the comparisons to last years team.
Yes. This team is light years better than last year's team. Especially true when one sees our HC and staff.
Rutgers did not play its A game vs a talented ncaa tourney team that was athletic and long, on the road. Rutgers did not box out well, shot poorly, freeman had a bad night. Cory needs to pick up the offense. The NBA is not an option at this time.
I'm surprised to hear that sentiment given how much better we are this year because of coaching. Clearly you have to have both. And plenty of examples where the recruiting was there and the coaching wasn't. See St. John's, e.g.What we have seen in football and mens basketball is the importance of recruiting.Coaching can keep you in some games against better teams but ultimately talent matters and Rutgers still is lacking.
I think it is time to retire the comparisons to last years team.
I think it is time to retire the comparisons to last years team.