Show me one peer-reviewed RCT that shows ivermectin is effective against SARS-CoV-2. Hint: you can't. I also doubt there are "thousands" of doctors who think ivermectin works (~1% of MDs would be ~1000 and >99% of the ~1MM MDs are vaccinated).
Also, given how many of you are fond of saying that the vaccines are just a financial play by "Pharma" how would you then explain Merck, the company that pioneered ivermectin issuing the following, stating that ivermectin has no known clinical efficacy for COVID (and a lack of safety data at the doses used by some), when doing so reduces a potentially large income stream?
And every medical regulatory body in the world (not just the US) has failed to authorize or approved ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19 in humans (and has raised major safety concerns in using ivermectin for COVID-19; us of ivermectin was all off-label). But somehow you and a few quacks know better. smh.
https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/
KENILWORTH, N.J., Feb. 4, 2021 – Merck (NYSE: MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, today affirmed its position regarding use of ivermectin during the COVID-19 pandemic. Company scientists continue to carefully examine the findings of all available and emerging studies of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 for evidence of efficacy and safety. It is important to note that, to-date, our analysis has identified:
- No scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies;
- No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease, and;
- A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.
We do not believe that the data available support the safety and efficacy of ivermectin beyond the doses and populations indicated in the regulatory agency-approved prescribing information.