ADVERTISEMENT

Game 16 Purdue: Recruiting needs to pick up

Baylor got to the tournament in Scott Drew's 5th season. Jamie Dixon got TCU there in year 2 after the previous coach averaged 12.5 wins a year. Bruce Pearl took four years at Ole Miss. Ben Howland went 25-12 in year 3 and barely missed the tournament, and their previous coach was almost Eddie-bad.

2-5 years is a reasonable timeframe. Given that it's Rutgers, I think 5 years is a fair amount of time.

That being said, if recruiting doesn't improve then it's not hard to predict what will happen in year 5.


Capel at Pitt this year...not saying they are going anywhere this year but last year under Stallings they were 0-18/8-24 and now they are 12-5/2-2 and just beat #12 Florida State. Looking at their roster they are very young
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUsojo and kcg88
McClung has no role in the backcourt on this roster. He's playing a LOT at Georgetown by necessity. He's playing off the ball, which makes a difference to freewheel and take as many shots as he likes. It's not guarding or being guarded by Carsen Edwards, Cassius Winston, Luther Muhammad, Anthony Cowen and Trice from Wisconsin.

This is the best B1G league in the last 5 years. There's no free lunch here, sorry but the Big East is solid, but i can't compare leagues top to.bottom.

The more legitimate discussion is recruiting multiple Top 75 to 100 kids which is what the Top half or 3/4 of the B1G, ACC, Big East, Big 12 and SEC does....and if RU isn't getting their hands very dirty like the LSU'S or blue bloods, i don't see a path for a quick fix.

Keep in mind Mathis almost went to UConn via the path most recruits go....life looks drastically different if you dont land Mathis and find gems in Harper, McConnell and Mulcahy that are outside the AAU cesspool of recruiting. You have to take the pieces that want to be here, beyond the Alvarado, Hyatt, Massoud types that landed elsewhere or made their decisions based on what most recruits do at that level.

The entire planet missed on McClung but we cant have 4 guards all playing off the ball. At some point, Georgetown will have to find a legitimate SG and if McClung proves better than Mathis or Baker, then you tip your hat. He's not scoring 14PPG unless he's on the court for 30 minutes a game.....Mathis is a better defender, shooter and player.

If McClung turns out better than Mulcahy as a PG, he would be playing PG over Akinjo at GTown....he's effective because every teams SG or Off guard playing 30 minutes should score double digits. There's no value for McClung unless he's able to play PG, so his stats aren't relevant unless he's playing and running the offense.

The B1G finally appears to be returning to the basketball league it used to be in days past. After Michigan and Illinois both made the final four in 1989 there was a dip in the '90s as coaches such as Knight and Keady started getting old, and Coach K started his storied run at Duke, aided by ESPN and fawning announcers such as Duke Vitale and ACC-worshipping Billy Packer. The emergence of the Big East as a power conference was also a factor.

Despite a hiccup last year, the coaching in the B1G is probably as strong as it's been in years. Chambers at Penn State is teetering and I'm not sure Underwood is the answer at Illinois (which with the BB talent in that state should be a perennial top 25 team). Other than that, no easy touches (including Rutgers at home). I think Pike will be OK for you guys long-term. Guess we'll see.
 
Capel at Pitt this year...not saying they are going anywhere this year but last year under Stallings they were 0-18/8-24 and now they are 12-5/2-2 and just beat #12 Florida State. Looking at their roster they are very young

Capel has a reputation documented for buying players....RU can do the same as Pitt, as others around the country...it's not rocket science it's the reality of getting the best players in your program. To act as if RU has any past coaches like Capel with a track record documented from Oklahoma is just not true.

The path is tougher and longer if you don't cheat. Northwestern and Wisconsin don't and are rare in this level of talent pool to have the ability to have any success. I would argue that Northwestern has the model or blueprint but they went a full decade under Carmody and now Collins with 1 appearance. They've closed the gaps considerably from years ago where you have to play well to beat them.

I would love Naz Reid or whatever 1 or 2 and done players vs Issa Thiam or whatever we play in our front court. I also know enough that it's not in our DNA as a school and culture athletically as a University.
 
Hawk touched on something that has become apparent to me...that Pike and thus far more closely resembles N'western under Carmody. slow, steady climb, never got into NCAA, into NIT a number of times...now, I obviously hope for better, but this has the look of taking at least 5 years, and maybe longer, to get to the NCAAs. We have to hope that Baker as a senior, and the current frosh class as juniors can do it. It might take 1-3 more recruiting cycles...the players after Baker, Eugene, etc. But we also can't have transfers, or players jumping to playing professionally earlier either.

I'm not going to throw shade at Pitt. I'm 44, following RU since I was in Pharmacy school in the 90s, I really don't care if RU does it the way as Pitt does, I just want it done. who cares how Willard and shoe did it, they have now made the NCAAs 3 straight years.

Cronin did similar at Cincinnati, which to me is the best case for us here--I think took him 6 years, and Bearcats have far more tradition and success prior to Cronin than we do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac
Capel has a reputation documented for buying players....RU can do the same as Pitt, as others around the country...it's not rocket science it's the reality of getting the best players in your program. To act as if RU has any past coaches like Capel with a track record documented from Oklahoma is just not true.

The path is tougher and longer if you don't cheat. Northwestern and Wisconsin don't and are rare in this level of talent pool to have the ability to have any success. I would argue that Northwestern has the model or blueprint but they went a full decade under Carmody and now Collins with 1 appearance. They've closed the gaps considerably from years ago where you have to play well to beat them.

I would love Naz Reid or whatever 1 or 2 and done players vs Issa Thiam or whatever we play in our front court. I also know enough that it's not in our DNA as a school and culture athletically as a University.
i'd have ZERO issue with cheating to get players if i'm being totally honest. ZERO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LC-88 and RUsojo
i'd have ZERO issue with cheating to get players if i'm being totally honest. ZERO.

It's not cheating if 90% of the schools are all doing it, just saying we can't hire a QB coach and haven't had any facilities in basketball, ever. Most schools don't get caught but the mandate Hobbs has, is to run a clean program.

He also had the same mandate for Kevin Willard at SHU until their fans and donors whined enough to engineer the Whitehead debacle. I don't think it's sustainable if you aren't in that pool for players each year, so it depends on where rebuild is.

My guess is when Mathis, McConnell Harper and Myles Johnson are juniors is the recruiting class that sustains what's been put in place today.....and it assumes no hiccups in playern development.
 
Hawk touched on something that has become apparent to me...that Pike and thus far more closely resembles N'western under Carmody. slow, steady climb, never got into NCAA, into NIT a number of times...now, I obviously hope for better, but this has the look of taking at least 5 years, and maybe longer, to get to the NCAAs. We have to hope that Baker as a senior, and the current frosh class as juniors can do it. It might take 1-3 more recruiting cycles...the players after Baker, Eugene, etc. But we also can't have transfers, or players jumping to playing professionally earlier either.

I'm not going to throw shade at Pitt. I'm 44, following RU since I was in Pharmacy school in the 90s, I really don't care if RU does it the way as Pitt does, I just want it done. who cares how Willard and shoe did it, they have now made the NCAAs 3 straight years.

Cronin did similar at Cincinnati, which to me is the best case for us here--I think took him 6 years, and Bearcats have far more tradition and success prior to Cronin than we do.

Carmody was a good Xs and Os man, but notoriously hated to recruit. Frank Kaminsky, who went to high school in Illinois, had expressed some interest in Northwestern, but Carmody made little effort to reel him in and he ended up at Wisconsin. Although Carmody did better than most had done at Northwestern, they finally let him go when the realization that he had reached his ceiling sunk in.
 
I liken this year to playing a round of golf. We're going to shoot a 110, but we're going to make about 6 or 7 really nice shots that make us believe there is hope, and that keep us coming back for another round next year.

Hopefully we break 100 next year...
 
I liken this year to playing a round of golf. We're going to shoot a 110, but we're going to make about 6 or 7 really nice shots that make us believe there is hope, and that keep us coming back for another round next year.

Hopefully we break 100 next year...
What did we shoot the last two years?
 
McClung has no role in the backcourt on this roster. He's playing a LOT at Georgetown by necessity. He's playing off the ball, which makes a difference to freewheel and take as many shots as he likes. It's not guarding or being guarded by Carsen Edwards, Cassius Winston, Luther Muhammad, Anthony Cowen and Trice from Wisconsin.

This is the best B1G league in the last 5 years. There's no free lunch here, sorry but the Big East is solid, but i can't compare leagues top to.bottom.

The more legitimate discussion is recruiting multiple Top 75 to 100 kids which is what the Top half or 3/4 of the B1G, ACC, Big East, Big 12 and SEC does....and if RU isn't getting their hands very dirty like the LSU'S or blue bloods, i don't see a path for a quick fix.

Keep in mind Mathis almost went to UConn via the path most recruits go....life looks drastically different if you dont land Mathis and find gems in Harper, McConnell and Mulcahy that are outside the AAU cesspool of recruiting. You have to take the pieces that want to be here, beyond the Alvarado, Hyatt, Massoud types that landed elsewhere or made their decisions based on what most recruits do at that level.

The entire planet missed on McClung but we cant have 4 guards all playing off the ball. At some point, Georgetown will have to find a legitimate SG and if McClung proves better than Mathis or Baker, then you tip your hat. He's not scoring 14PPG unless he's on the court for 30 minutes a game.....Mathis is a better defender, shooter and player.

If McClung turns out better than Mulcahy as a PG, he would be playing PG over Akinjo at GTown....he's effective because every teams SG or Off guard playing 30 minutes should score double digits. There's no value for McClung unless he's able to play PG, so his stats aren't relevant unless he's playing and running the offense.

Little early to be calling those 3 guys “gems”. Classic case of overrating our talent and my highlighting recruiting deficiencies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JFK20
It's not cheating if 90% of the schools are all doing it, just saying we can't hire a QB coach and haven't had any facilities in basketball, ever. Most schools don't get caught but the mandate Hobbs has, is to run a clean program.

He also had the same mandate for Kevin Willard at SHU until their fans and donors whined enough to engineer the Whitehead debacle. I don't think it's sustainable if you aren't in that pool for players each year, so it depends on where rebuild is.

My guess is when Mathis, McConnell Harper and Myles Johnson are juniors is the recruiting class that sustains what's been put in place today.....and it assumes no hiccups in playern development.

Still waiting for Willard's involvement with the Whitehead thing to be made public. So far nada.

Enough with the people who win cheat and we won't stuff-----it's lame.

Nobody anywhere doing a better job than Jeff Capel right now.

Inherited a mess of RU proportions and is competitive right away with young kids in one of the best leagues if not the best league in the country.
 
Do you pay taxes on your casino winnings?

I don't gamble
Still waiting for Willard's involvement with the Whitehead thing to be made public. So far nada.

Enough with the people who win cheat and we won't stuff-----it's lame.

Nobody anywhere doing a better job than Jeff Capel right now.

Inherited a mess of RU proportions and is competitive right away with young kids in one of the best leagues if not the best league in the country.

It's not lame. No doubt there are plenty of reasons why we have a tough time getting recruits that don't have to do with $, but if what i hear is accurate $ is the nail in the coffin
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUonBrain
I don't gamble


It's not lame. No doubt there are plenty of reasons why we have a tough time getting recruits that don't have to do with $, but if what i hear is accurate $ is the nail in the coffin

If you invest in individual stocks you gamble.

But anyway since you didn’t want to play and admittedly I tried to set the trap it’s not cheating if everyone does it.
 
If you invest in individual stocks you gamble.

But anyway since you didn’t want to play and admittedly I tried to set the trap it’s not cheating if everyone does it.

I don't gamble, I own and when my ownership terminates in a profit I pay taxes.
 
I don't gamble, I own and when my ownership terminates in a profit I pay taxes.

Good for you for investing through traditional vehicles that don’t include any individual stocks.

It’s not cheating if everyone does it.
 
Will that work with speeding tickets?

Yes actually GREAT analogy. No one thinks your a worse person for getting a speeding ticket and anyone can get one even if they are typically responsible in their approach. No one thinks you’re a great person for not getting one.

Now if you speed and get into an accident and physically hurt someone else that’s a different story. But in this analogy no one is actually impacted to that degree.

Great point! Thanks!
 
I blame one of you who told me we won’t lose by 35 anymore since we got rid of EJ.
 
Still waiting for Willard's involvement with the Whitehead thing to be made public. So far nada.

Enough with the people who win cheat and we won't stuff-----it's lame.

Nobody anywhere doing a better job than Jeff Capel right now.

Inherited a mess of RU proportions and is competitive right away with young kids in one of the best leagues if not the best league in the country.


no one is getting in trouble for paying players anymore, if everyone is doing it, RU needs to do it as well or drop down.
 
Yes actually GREAT analogy. No one thinks your a worse person for getting a speeding ticket and anyone can get one even if they are typically responsible in their approach. No one thinks you’re a great person for not getting one.

Now if you speed and get into an accident and physically hurt someone else that’s a different story. But in this analogy no one is actually impacted to that degree.

Great point! Thanks!
Sorry it wasn’t clear I was making a joke.

My serious comment is this: I agree that we should do what every other team in the B1G is doing—“every,” not “some.” If all programs which are having more success than we have had for forty years, are doing something, I accept your point. But that requires me to believe that we are a clean program and there are no others—since we are historically bad.
 
Little early to be calling those 3 guys “gems”. Classic case of overrating our talent and my highlighting recruiting deficiencies.

Exactly. It's a joke the constant spin. How can someone say McClung, who is averaging 13 points a game "has no fit in our backcourt"...and then a paragraph later say that Harper, McConnell, and Mulcahy are "gems". It makes no damn sense. Two guys on are current roster who are shooting at a worst % than McClung and have the same assist/to ratio...and one kid who is still in HS.

This is not saying McClung is Allen Iverson. Or Harper and McConnell are busts. But give me a break with the nonsense, agenda, and spin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: soundcrib
how Do you guys know we are not cheating? Maybe we are but we suck at that too. RU probably doesn’t know what venmo is. Also, where is RU getting they money to buy players?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT