Pump it up Gavin!He looks like a young Elvis Costello in that photo. "His aim is true". https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f5/MyAim_isTrue.jpg
Pump it up Gavin!He looks like a young Elvis Costello in that photo. "His aim is true". https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f5/MyAim_isTrue.jpg
I agree. And if Gavin plays as you describe, he will earn a ton of minutes and will be a top scorer on the team. We don’t know if it will happen, but I like Gavin’s chances.If he is servicable on defense, and very efficient and skilled on offense, Rutgers is highly likely to be a better team next year.
There is a non-zero chance he’s one and done.Gavin isn’t going to be a 1 and done. It’s just a few random posters who think that.
Exactly - 3 years is not close to not one and done. As I said, I haven’t seen much of Gavin but his scouting report makes it seem like Wieskamp would be a good camparison.Joe Weiskamp left Iowa after 3 years and was the 41st pick in the NBA draft.
Lol it’s not closeExactly - 3 years is not close to not one and done. As I said, I haven’t seen much of Gavin but his scouting report makes it seem like Wieskamp would be a good camparison.
I've watched a few of Gavin's HS games. Teams aim to shut him down and he'll play more within a system. Don't get me wrong, when he gets his outside shot going, look out, but against top competition, he won't consistently be able to create his own shot, at least not high percentage ones. Nothing about his defense stands out, in comparison to Mag who was a standout defender at Prolific Prep. Ace Bailey is an obvious one and done. Not likely for Gavin. Weiskamp seems like a good comparison.
How many one and dons last year?
It seems like you think one and done means elite defender elite shot creator and elite shooter
You’re describing a #1 pick not a typical one and done
Again I’m not saying he is 100% one and done just that it’s somewhat likely
There’s also a non- zero chance it takes some time adjusting to the speed of the college game and he ends up with a first year stat line of 5 ppg / 2 rpg in average 15ish minutes of action. Likely? No, but.. Plenty of highly rated recruits underperform relative to their stars every year.There is a non-zero chance he’s one and done.
Is it 90%? No it’s less than that
Is it 10%? No it’s more than that
I don’t think anyone is saying it’s 100%
Remember how we all swooned over Jaden Jones as he arrived on the Banks? Then we saw him play in game competition.There’s also a non- zero chance it takes some time adjusting to the speed of the college game and he ends up with a first year stat line of 5 ppg / 2 rpg in average 15ish minutes of action. Likely? No, but.. Plenty of highly rated recruits underperform relative to their stars every year.
Of course.There’s also a non- zero chance it takes some time adjusting to the speed of the college game and he ends up with a first year stat line of 5 ppg / 2 rpg in average 15ish minutes of action. Likely? No, but.. Plenty of highly rated recruits underperform relative to their stars every year.
Who's underrating him? Rivals has him at 22 and he has 10+ big time offers.Of course.
The chance at one and done is significantly higher than that.
Pike is really good at finding guys that most other coaches underrate.
Griffiths is also one of those guys.
Who's underrating him? Rivals has him at 22 and he has 10+ big time offers.
Others have him ranked differently - much higher numbersWho's underrating him? Rivals has him at 22 and he has 10+ big time offers.
Yikes - you're better than this.For reference point, Hunter Dickinson and Cliff Omoyuri were in the 40 range in 2020 and both are 4 year college players.
Yikes - you're better than this.
Yes - I was referring to comparing him to Big Ten Centers which was sillyI have seen him play live and I think we should have reasonable expectations for the player. I think he will be our leading scoring person in about half of our games ....BUT that doesn't make him a 1 & done player. What is the malfunction with not equating quality B1G starter as automatically meaning he's a 1 & done??
If the player has an industry ranking of 40, how should the entire B1G rank him, compared to all of the other Top 40-50 kids, spread out over the last 2 to 4 recruiting classes??
Do we have to show the players from 2021 to 2022 and which ones are consensus Top 40 and how they are performing across the national landscape??
We should have reasonable expectations. My expectations are extremely high for Gavin, I think he should take 200+ 3 pointers as a freshman, play 25 to 26 minutes a game, average in double figures for PPG, but that doesn't mean I think he's a 1 & done.
Does that make sense??
Ha! I wrote this before. I started following Rutgers for GG, but what really got me into it was Pike.Milo
You have a lot of basketball knowledge.
Personally I enjoy your posts.
Just curious if Gavin is one and done will you be as active on the boards here next summer?
Well I get the impression we should REALLY trust what you say about Gavin.Ha! I wrote this before. I started following Rutgers for GG, but what really got me into it was Pike.
I truly think he's different than any other high-major coach.
Unfortunately, there isn't that much news on Pike right now. Too bad he doesn't do a weekly podcast or something and talk about interesting stuff. I'd love to hear about his asst coach search or why Hobbs left or how he feels about Cliff's spring.
I have seen him play live and I think we should have reasonable expectations for the player. I think he will be our leading scoring person in about half of our games ....BUT that doesn't make him a 1 & done player. What is the malfunction with not equating quality B1G starter as automatically meaning he's a 1 & done??
If the player has an industry ranking of 40, how should the entire B1G rank him, compared to all of the other Top 40-50 kids, spread out over the last 2 to 4 recruiting classes??
Do we have to show the players from 2021 to 2022 and which ones are consensus Top 40 and how they are performing across the national landscape??
We should have reasonable expectations. My expectations are extremely high for Gavin, I think he should take 200+ 3 pointers as a freshman, play 25 to 26 minutes a game, average in double figures for PPG, but that doesn't mean I think he's a 1 & done.
Does that make sense??
I don’t think anyone he is saying he is a likely one and done player, but there is a chance he is and it isn’t small percentage. If he does what you say, and let me add one more wrinkle, if he shoots over 40% from 3 and shows the ability to attack the basket when defenders try to close out on him, the odds of being one and done will be up substantially, because the league need shooters.I have seen him play live and I think we should have reasonable expectations for the player. I think he will be our leading scoring person in about half of our games ....BUT that doesn't make him a 1 & done player. What is the malfunction with not equating quality B1G starter as automatically meaning he's a 1 & done??
If the player has an industry ranking of 40, how should the entire B1G rank him, compared to all of the other Top 40-50 kids, spread out over the last 2 to 4 recruiting classes??
Do we have to show the players from 2021 to 2022 and which ones are consensus Top 40 and how they are performing across the national landscape??
We should have reasonable expectations. My expectations are extremely high for Gavin, I think he should take 200+ 3 pointers as a freshman, play 25 to 26 minutes a game, average in double figures for PPG, but that doesn't mean I think he's a 1 & done.
Does that make sense??
Correct. It’s not about underrating him. Odds are still against the 22nd rated frosh coming in and performing at a level where he’s a projected 1st rounder. Could it happen? Sure. As a fan, do we have reason to expect this outcome any more than the possibility he comes in and has a pedestrian first season adjusting to the game? I don’t think so. It can go either way. How can anyone know how the season will go until Gavin plays in a few college games?
Most kids return for a second season unless they have a legit chance of going in the first round. And very few frosh end up in this category. You really have to stand out. Meanwhile - plenty of highly rated frosh go to college and don’t end up averaging more than 20 mpg as frosh and don’t average double figures.
When Pike found him, Gavin wasn’t rated 22 by anyone.Who's underrating him? Rivals has him at 22 and he has 10+ big time offers.
There needs to be a significant increase in scoring for Rutgers to get a NCAA bid because the defense probably will be worse with players leaving and Mags injury.I’m gonna guess this GG cat averages at least 10 ppg as a freshman. The question to me is whether or not he can average 15 ppg…which would be a lot considering there will be more than a few games he’ll be in single digits.
Yeah. Hope to see some “junk” defenses. Cliff can erase a lot of stuff down low which is huge.There needs to be a significant increase in scoring for Rutgers to get a NCAA bid because the defense probably will be worse with players leaving and Mags injury.
Shurna was a sharpshooter for Northwestern…40% career (4 yrs) 3pt shooter there…5 3-pt attempts per game. Plays pro in Europe.
It’s going to surprise many how athletic Gavin isShurna was a sharpshooter for Northwestern…40% career (4 yrs) 3pt shooter there…5 3-pt attempts per game. Plays pro in Europe.
Fair comparison and not a slight by any means…but Gavin is a little more athletic (although body still thin) I think.
Yeah I agree. Gavin would have had at least one dunk in Shurna’s highlights. Shurna is listed at 6’9” but I bet Gavin is at least as long…and Gavin already has a nice step-back move James Harden would approve of.I love it when guys try to find comps for Gavin
It’s going to surprise many how athletic Gavin is
Comparisons are always funny with him
We’re in trouble if Gavin’s max potential is Shurna. I’m hoping more like Sam Deker from this final four Wisconsin team
Right now NBA Draft Room has Gavin going in the 2nd round in 2025, after his sophomore year. Currently expected to be much better than Shurna.Shurna was a sharpshooter for Northwestern…40% career (4 yrs) 3pt shooter there…5 3-pt attempts per game. Plays pro in Europe.
Fair comparison and not a slight by any means…but Gavin is a little more athletic (although his body is still thin) I think.
I agree that Gavin has more athleticism and has some “wiggle” to his game (it’ll be interesting to see how he looks with some more weight on him but I think he’s the textbook definition of wiry right now) but being compared to a knock down distance shooter and 2,000 point scorer in college isn’t really a bad thing.Right now NBA Draft Room has Gavin going in the 2nd round in 2025, after his sophomore year. Currently expected to be much better than Shurna.