Your response makes no sense. I've posted this at least 10 times, but here we go again. An average flu season (2010-2017; the last 2 years are "preliminary" so not included) has 34K deaths, but remember, that's the product of a model, not actual confirmed deaths - in all those years there hasn't been more than 15K confirmed flu deaths. COVID deaths are almost all confirmed (and known to be undercounted vs. excess deaths) and we have 167K now which is ~5X an average flu season - so it's already 5X, which makes your 0.5X and 2X nonsensical.
Currently, we're seeing about 1/2 the deaths per cases we saw in wave 1, due to the combo of a much younger age profile, many more less sick positives (early on, only signficantly symptomatic people got tested and schools/colleges were shut down as were most people), and much improved medical procedures/treatments. That would make the comparison 12-25X the death rate of the flu from here on out, instead of 25-50X - and I believe that will drop much more when engineered antibodies come out this fall and even further with vaccines by the end of the year. But since those outcomes aren't guaranteed, it certainly seems to me that preventing even 12-25X the deaths (and 3-5X that many hospitalized) is worth wearing masks and distancing.
Also, with regard to children, the number of deaths from COVID is now about equal to flu and climbing, so it's likely to be a bit greater soon and the number of cases in children has increased by 90% the past 4 weeks. The cases in children were hugely suppressed by the closure of schools and lockdowns.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/11/health/covid-19-children-cases-rising-wellness/index.html