For those with round table access ...check out there for some more information
For those with round table access ...check out there for some more information
What news are you taking about??I am excited to hear about BK's news. Best to Mathis.
---RT news thumbs up or thumbs down?
Have I told you guys lately how much I want Mathis to RU and how much I like this kids game ?
This kid is a top 25-50 type kid guys ...his underranking reminds me very much of dahthay jones...a top 75-100 kid talented whose current game is VERY good and you watch and say...."this kid is gonna g to be a player....as best basketball is still Yet to be played"....as opposed to a top 75 kid who is there because he is good, but overblown because he plays on the right AAU team
I disagree. I've seen him play in person twice and have watched several more games on video. I think we have him ranked appropriately. There are two guys ranked between No. 70 and Mathis at 83 that I think should be ranked behind him, but that's it.This kid is a top 25-50 type kid guys ...his underranking reminds me very much of dahthay jones...a top 75-100 kid talented whose current game is VERY good and you watch and say...."this kid is gonna g to be a player....as best basketball is still Yet to be played"....as opposed to a top 75 kid who is there because he is good, but overblown because he plays on the right AAU team
You might also want to factor in that, according to what I was told, is already 18 (almost 19) & his wingspan is just 6'6.Russ
Respect your opinion
I should be more specific ...
Part of my top 25-50 opinion is that I reflect upside into that equation where I think most recruiting rankings look at what is in front of them right now
This kids upside has me of opinion that he potential has much higher upside relative to his current ranking, which is pretty good right now. Some kids don't have that upside
, he does
25, 50, 75...doesn't matter much.Russ
Respect your opinion
I should be more specific ...
Part of my top 25-50 opinion is that I reflect upside into that equation where I think most recruiting rankings look at what is in front of them right now
This kids upside has me of opinion that he potential has much higher upside relative to his current ranking, which is pretty good right now. Some kids don't have that upside
, he does
Worst number colors ever. Even worse than the salmon football uniform numbers. White on white? Other than that, fingers crossed that 247 and others are wrong and that he chooses Rutgers.
You might also want to factor in that, according to what I was told, is already 18 (almost 19) & his wingspan is just 6'6.
So he's old for his grade, and not very long. His age lowers that ceiling/upside a bit.
Lol.I doubt RT has special insight that's not already out there. Its looking like UCONN all they way unfortunately. Crazier things have happened but its pointing in that direction
Eric Bossi from Rivals:
UConn has been the runaway favorite on this one for a while now. I'd be pretty shocked if he doesn't pick the Huskies on Friday.
He referenced Friday. Must be recentI saw the Uconn board post this. Seems like this info was before some recent developments.
Yea, pay to get "inside info" one day before the kid gives the info himself. I'll just wait til he announces.The news is on RT.
He referenced Friday. Must be recent
Good point re: his age. To bring it back to Dahntay Jones, he was the opposite- I think on young side; and wasn't big on the AAU /private school hoop scene so flew a bit under the radar. That doesn't appear to be the case with this kid....
I hope we can get him, but it's pretty clear the board has lost perspective here. Newbies?
Lol.
Not really. When it comes to evaluations I always take age into consideration. If I'm watching a *cough* 17U game and a kid is playing really well and I learn that he is 18 years and six months old but his defenders are a 16 year-old playing up or 17 year old...well I factor that in.I'm a newbie?
And the age difference is relevant to the pros and NOT to the college game
Not really. When it comes to evaluations I always take age into consideration. If I'm watching a *cough* 17U game and a kid is playing really well and I learn that he is 18 years and six months old but his defenders are a 16 year-old playing up or 17 year old...well I factor that in.
It could also mean that the older kid, who will be almost 20 by the time his freshman season in college begins, has a high floor and not a high ceiling.
The opposite is also true. In July 2015 when I saw Devon Dotson for the first time with Team Charlotte's 17U team, I was impressed...then I when I spoke to his father and found out the kid was just 15...well that changed my evaluation. Kinda like the 6-foot-1 point guard I saw Friday playing for Team Charlotte in the AAU Super Showcase -- Jalen Hood Schifino (remember that name) -- the kid was solid with the ball, nothing flashy but steady under pressure. Then I looked in my media packet and saw that he's in the class of 2022 (he's a rising 8th grader) and he's more than holding his own in a 17U game.
Btw, Team Charlotte 17U won the AAU Super Showcase Gold championship with a rising 8th grader at point guard.
So, yes...age difference is relevant at the college level.
And that guy - for what it is worth - is their #1 ranked 'expert'.Guy on 247 has Mathis going to RU now.