If they are within a game or two of the wildcard at the deadline, I don't know how you face your players if you start selling off.A a statistical oddity: Mets are at .500 (45-45) with a run differential of exactly zero. They have scored 433 and allowed 433.
This suggests that the Mets are neither underachieving nor overachieving. They are what their record says they are - a middling team. Not bad enough to justify a full selloff. Not good enough to justify an all-in buying spree.
My guess is that they might do a bit of both. Sell a veteran starter, buy a high end reliever. And hopefully make an incremental improvement to their farm system with the arbitrage.
I'm hesitant to put too much stock into the schedule thing after what happened like 2-3 years ago. The year when all the talk was about the soft schedule in September would allow us to do some real damage and really make a run to a wild card. Only to then get beat up on by the so-called dregs of the league.Schedule before and after the trade deadline until September. They should be a few games over .500 going into that Braves series. After the deadline there is a lot of winnable games as well on the schedule.
2 more vs Washington
3 vs Colorado
ASB
4 @ Miami
2 @ NYY
4 vs Atlanta
3 vs Minny
Trade Deadline
3 @ LAA
1 @ STL (Make-Up)
3 @ Colorado
3 @ Seattle
3 vs Oakland
3 vs Miami
3 vs Baltimore
4 @ SD
3 @ Arizona
3 @ White Sox
September it gets a bit tough again.
Right. And if you pay prospects or viable players for a high-end reliever but then also sell off a starter for prospects what have you gained for this year, other than a massive PR problem. It would suggest a front office that doesn't know what it's doing or can't make up its mind. That doesn't seem like Stearns to me.If they are within a game or two of the wildcard at the deadline, I don't know how you face your players if you start selling off.
Well those guys really paint a rosy picture.
Worked with Torrens--so far. Best pick up of the year.All evidence from yesterday to the contrary. No one said we overpaid. But we nonetheless are throwing a hail mary. No reason not to try.
So far, yes. Though his numbers this year are much better than his career averages. It wasn't an expensive gamble, though, and so far it's paid off.Worked with Torrens--so far. Best pick up of the year.
You would have achieved better balance.Right. And if you pay prospects or viable players for a high-end reliever but then also sell off a starter for prospects what have you gained for this year, other than a massive PR problem. It would suggest a front office that doesn't know what it's doing or can't make up its mind. That doesn't seem like Stearns to me.
Would you? If you look at a season as innings, starters pitch more innings than relievers. So how have you done anything but gotten worse and more pitching needy.You would have achieved better balance. . . .
That's a very in general statement though that ignores that the Mets have, especially if and when Senga is back, numbers at starting pitching and a very poor bullpen.Would you? If you look at a season as innings, starters pitch more innings than relievers. So how have you done anything but gotten worse and more pitching needy.
Put another way, the team has one pitching staff, and it will throw so many innings. If you trade away 80 of your best innings in return for 30 or 40 good innings, what you've done is create a hole. And no amount of talk or reasoning will suddenly make those 30 or 40 innings more important than the 80.
No, it's a very specific statement. If you in essence swap a starter for a reliever, you will be trading more innings away than you're getting.That's a very in general statement though that ignores that the Mets have, especially if and when Senga is back, numbers at starting pitching and a very poor bullpen.
It is doubtful that they are going to trade a quality starter even up for a relief pitcher.No, it's a very specific statement. If you in essence swap a starter for a reliever, you will be trading more innings away than you're getting.
So long E.Orze with your INF E.R.A. Will he have a chance to lower it below INF?Reed Garrett to the IL with elbow inflammation. Maton activated. Young up. Orze down.
They've been killing that guy lately. He hadn't been very effective in a while either. Guess the two might correlate.Reed Garrett to the IL with elbow inflammation. Maton activated. Young up. Orze down.
if you have starters in house you are not trading away innings.No, it's a very specific statement. If you in essence swap a starter for a reliever, you will be trading more innings away than you're getting.
Orze down? How cruel! They could've at least given him a chance to get a mathematically determinable ERA.Reed Garrett to the IL with elbow inflammation. Maton activated. Young up. Orze down.
I think you've walked yourself into a fantasy world in which the Mets would be trading a starter who can't even make their rotation for meaningful prospects.if you have starters in house you are not trading away innings.
You are trading a guy who could throw those innings but may not due to already having guys who could also throw those innings.
I'm not expecting meaningful prospects, but I'm also not expecting to trade meaningful prospects for a middle reliever.I think you've walked yourself into a fantasy world in which the Mets would be trading a starter who can't even make their rotation for meaningful prospects.
I agree that, absent some quick downward spiral, the Mets won't be trading starters for meaningful prospects (or any prospects).I'm not expecting meaningful prospects, but I'm also not expecting to trade meaningful prospects for a middle reliever.
Does Butto stay in the pen?I agree that, absent some quick downward spiral, the Mets won't be trading starters for meaningful prospects. That, though, is one of several reasons that they won't be trading starting pitching.
They may, however, give up prospects for relievers. I'm not sure what else they have. I'd prefer, though, that they try pitchers in their system, particularly the good ones. Even if they are not relievers. I've mentioned Sproat.
As long as he's effective, pitch him somewhere. Just get the right (or best we have) arms onto the staff and take a shot at this thing.Does Butto stay in the pen?
Sounds good, but what future HOF 1B is available? ;)So- I think Vientos and Alvarez are future big time stars- we are locked in with Nimmo and Lindor- with these 4- you lock in a future HOF 1B, which does not even put us anywhere near the top salary with everyone coming off contract next year.
Alvarez/Vientos may be our next Wright/Reyes combo
Oh crap, you bring up Vogey again? Just the other day you were going on about negative Mets fans, "except for a few, this thread is full of waaay to much whining and crying". Take a look in the mirror, geez.
Good call! It HAS been fun... so far.Starting pitcher out
Now the fun starts 😳
Yeah 3 of 4 losses to Nats would be a very no buenoPadres just lost
Getting very close
Must beat these crappy teams before break
I’m thinking a 500+ HR 1B is available after this year- just sayingSounds good, but what future HOF 1B is available? ;)