Re: OT: anyone else see this? What color is this dress?
Originally posted by mikemarc1:
Looks blue and gold to me.
+1
Originally posted by mikemarc1:
Looks blue and gold to me.
+1
After seeing this dress thing all over the internet for the last few days, I am wondering what the overlap is between people making an effort in trying to figure this out, and people who don't research the issues before they vote (or don't vote at all) because "they don't have the time".Originally posted by RUChoppin:
I wonder what the overlap is between people who see the dress as white/gold and people who think our scarlet uniforms look salmon.
I agree with this.Originally posted by derleider:
Whats interesting is that the optical illusion appears to come and go and vary between people and between viewings. Two people looking at it on the same device in the same ambient lighting conditions are seeing two different things. Thats what made it go viral. Its just so out of the ordinary, and calls into question alot of how you think about what you see (I mean no wonder eye witnesses are unreliable if two people cant even agree on something as basic as the broad colors of a picture of a dress.)
It's not really that weird, that's the whole point of optical illusions. People's brains are correcting the image for them based on past experiences and sensory details, i.e the gold/white crowd is assuming the image is a darkened photo due to shadows and the brain therefore projects it as such, whereas the blue/black see it as an overexposed photo. This is exactly what der's example image shows, you correct colors based on what you perceived the background to be.Originally posted by rutgersguy1:
I agree with this.Originally posted by derleider:
Whats interesting is that the optical illusion appears to come and go and vary between people and between viewings. Two people looking at it on the same device in the same ambient lighting conditions are seeing two different things. Thats what made it go viral. Its just so out of the ordinary, and calls into question alot of how you think about what you see (I mean no wonder eye witnesses are unreliable if two people cant even agree on something as basic as the broad colors of a picture of a dress.)
I think it is. Like I mentioned on that National Geographic show Brain Games they do these kind of optical illusions of how our brains perceive things and try to fill in the blanks etc...using contextual clues and what not. The thing is unless they change those contextual clues from subject to subject pretty much everyone has the same perception of whatever test they may be demonstrating.Originally posted by RUGT:
It's not really that weird, that's the whole point of optical illusions. People's brains are correcting the image for them based on past experiences and sensory details, i.e the gold/white crowd is assuming the image is a darkened photo due to shadows and the brain therefore projects it as such, whereas the blue/black see it as an overexposed photo. This is exactly what der's example image shows, you correct colors based on what you perceived the background to be.Originally posted by rutgersguy1:
I agree with this.Originally posted by derleider:
Whats interesting is that the optical illusion appears to come and go and vary between people and between viewings. Two people looking at it on the same device in the same ambient lighting conditions are seeing two different things. Thats what made it go viral. Its just so out of the ordinary, and calls into question alot of how you think about what you see (I mean no wonder eye witnesses are unreliable if two people cant even agree on something as basic as the broad colors of a picture of a dress.)
FWIW, the dress is actually blue/black. Here is a picture of it pulled from an online retail store and the original image when the exposure is corrected for. If you assume it's underexposed (i.e you see it as gold/white) the color becomes extremely messed up when attempting to fix it.
Originally posted by RUGT:
It's not really that weird, that's the whole point of optical illusions. People's brains are correcting the image for them based on past experiences and sensory details, i.e the gold/white crowd is assuming the image is a darkened photo due to shadows and the brain therefore projects it as such, whereas the blue/black see it as an overexposed photo. This is exactly what der's example image shows, you correct colors based on what you perceived the background to be.Originally posted by rutgersguy1:
I agree with this.Originally posted by derleider:
Whats interesting is that the optical illusion appears to come and go and vary between people and between viewings. Two people looking at it on the same device in the same ambient lighting conditions are seeing two different things. Thats what made it go viral. Its just so out of the ordinary, and calls into question alot of how you think about what you see (I mean no wonder eye witnesses are unreliable if two people cant even agree on something as basic as the broad colors of a picture of a dress.)
FWIW, the dress is actually blue/black. Here is a picture of it pulled from an online retail store and the original image when the exposure is corrected for. If you assume it's underexposed (i.e you see it as gold/white) the color becomes extremely messed up when attempting to fix it.
I'm not saying it's not interesting, rather it's just not that hard to explain. You look at the picture, and immediately make an assumption on whether or not the photo is overexposed or underexposed. This assumption comes from relating sensory details of the image to past experiences and physical characteristics of your eyeball. Depending on which assumption you make, you get the different white/gold or black/blue answer.Originally posted by rutgersguy1:
I think it is. Like I mentioned on that National Geographic show Brain Games they do these kind of optical illusions of how our brains perceive things and try to fill in the blanks etc...using contextual clues and what not. The thing is unless they change those contextual clues from subject to subject pretty much everyone has the same perception of whatever test they may be demonstrating.Originally posted by RUGT:
It's not really that weird, that's the whole point of optical illusions. People's brains are correcting the image for them based on past experiences and sensory details, i.e the gold/white crowd is assuming the image is a darkened photo due to shadows and the brain therefore projects it as such, whereas the blue/black see it as an overexposed photo. This is exactly what der's example image shows, you correct colors based on what you perceived the background to be.Originally posted by rutgersguy1:
I agree with this.Originally posted by derleider:
Whats interesting is that the optical illusion appears to come and go and vary between people and between viewings. Two people looking at it on the same device in the same ambient lighting conditions are seeing two different things. Thats what made it go viral. Its just so out of the ordinary, and calls into question alot of how you think about what you see (I mean no wonder eye witnesses are unreliable if two people cant even agree on something as basic as the broad colors of a picture of a dress.)
FWIW, the dress is actually blue/black. Here is a picture of it pulled from an online retail store and the original image when the exposure is corrected for. If you assume it's underexposed (i.e you see it as gold/white) the color becomes extremely messed up when attempting to fix it.
In this you've kind of controlled for the variables like background light, screen brightness, device used, etc.. and two people are seeing completely different things that aren't even close. It's not say people on "opposite sides of the internet" with their own devices, various ambient lighting etc...It's 2 people in the same room looking at the same thing on the same device at the same angle and seeing completely different things. I don't know about you but I don't come across too many things like that.
This post was edited on 2/27 1:00 PM by rutgersguy1
Why do you think this is dumbing down. In fact if anything, lots of Americans probably learned something today about visual perception that they didnt know before.Originally posted by RutgersROB:
Idiocracy is happening all around us...the dumbing down of America
And to the fool that ended the debate by saying its blue and black because here is the actual dress for sale on a website....they do sell things in different colors...
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Originally posted by RutgersROB:
Idiocracy is happening all around us...the dumbing down of America
And to the fool that ended the debate by saying its blue and black because here is the actual dress for sale on a website....they do sell things in different colors...
Posted from Rivals Mobile