i am sure this will stir a good discussion. The article states the bill will likely go no where. But, will it gain momentum in time? Is there a need to tackle prior to 12 years old. One also thinks that tackling under the age of 12 does not lead to significant injury risk and teaches proper approach at a young that could actually limit injuries later on? If you suddenly start tackling as a teen with no prior expereince do you risk a higher level of injuries later on?
Also if you set it at 12 now, 15 is next followed by 18 under? All highly theoretical, but with a discussion, comes change.
https://www.northjersey.com/story/s...hildren-under-12-legislature-youth/491353002/
@Richard Schnyderite
Also if you set it at 12 now, 15 is next followed by 18 under? All highly theoretical, but with a discussion, comes change.
https://www.northjersey.com/story/s...hildren-under-12-legislature-youth/491353002/
@Richard Schnyderite
Last edited: