ADVERTISEMENT

OT: College Football Playoffs First Round 12/20-12/21 Fri-Sat

They should've called the mercy rule, or just shortened the game to 3 quarters. Both teams are pulling starters and running out the clock.
 
I think they have to re-think the seeding format next year. Both, the conference match-ups or geographies in the quarter final rounds seem suspicious.
It was a good set up before realignment which concentrated the best teams in 2 conferences. If the PAC and B12 existed as they were, Oregon, Texas, UGA, PSU would’ve been the top 4 seeds and there wouldn’t be an issue.

Expansion to 14 could fix it somewhat too as then the top 2 seeds are likely to be from the B10 and SEC so the byes wouldn’t be as big a deal as well. Then just seed the rest by rank.
 
It was a good set up before realignment which concentrated the best teams in 2 conferences. If the PAC and B12 existed as they were, Oregon, Texas, UGA, PSU would’ve been the top 4 seeds and there wouldn’t be an issue.
That's a great point and just getting to this point was brutal to begin with. Making changes now will take another five years of bickering and jockeying.
 
I think they have to re-think the seeding format next year. Both, the conference match-ups or geographies in the quarter final rounds seem suspicious.

While I totally get your point in terms of making the first round more competitive - I would keep the conf champs at byes. Those teams earn that spot. They had to play championship weekend and others didn’t. They stumbled along the way ( tOSU) or couldn’t win the championship.

We see teams steal bids all the time in the NCAA bball championship by winning the conference tournament.

I also think the home games had a lot more to do with the blowouts than the teams being bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeantownKnight
This is so dumb, is the selection supposed to be based on who matches up well with their opponent so it’s a close game? Four really good teams shit the bed, Alabama and Ole Miss would have had their drawers blown clear into orbit if they played instead. Who cares what the outcomes were, next year will be different. Seeding could be improved though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rutgers Chris
One thing this first year has shown is 12 teams is too many. They need to make it eight teams, make this week the first round, New Years Day the second round, and the Championship game a week later. Make it so the conference champions from the four big conferences are automatic entry, all undefeated teams from outside the power conferences get an automatic entry (at most it will be one in a year) and then the next highest ranked teams (according to one of the polls) round out the eight teams. Get seven bowl tie-ins and rotate them as the seven playoff games.

This year, you'd have:

(1) Oregon vs. (8) Ohio State
(4) Clemson vs. (5) Texas
(3) Arizona State vs. (6) Penn State
(2) Georgia vs. (7) Notre Dame

If a non-power conference school wants into the tournament? Sorry, you have to go undefeated or be ranked in the Top 8.
 
Only thing that would have made OSU routing Tenn better is if that douchnozzle Sean Mcdouough had been doing the play by play.

B1G is a bad conference? What does that make the mighty SEC and ACC?

BIG hasn’t played the best SEC teams yet.
 
OSU receiver gets mugged in end zone, officials rule an interception. Later the softest roughing the passer call negates an Igbinosun pick. This game could have been a near shutout and OSU could have put up 50+. Just pulling starters in 4th quarter should be a wake up call for the SEC superiority stuff.
 
Last edited:
I think they have to re-think the seeding format next year. Both, the conference match-ups or geographies in the quarter final rounds seem suspicious.
More importantly, they need to cut the playoffs down to 6 teams (or go back to 4). No need to see uncompetitive teams play against the big boys.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: rurichdog
I think you keep it the way it is for a few years.

1) The 4 team model concentrated talent amongst 4-5 team (tOSU, LSU, Clemson, Bama, Oregon, etc.) so the ability for more teams to access the playoff combined with NIL will take some time to level out the playing field.

2) I don’t think critics of the current approach are giving enough credit to the home game atmosphere. There is a reason why teams in the NFL want home field advantage in the playoffs. Combine that with the layoff to get healthy and game plan and the home teams should win like they did yesterday. We’ve all seen too many neutral site bowl games which were more competitive than expected because both teams are playing away.
 
I'd keep 12, but the 1st round byes go to the Top 4 rated teams. Keep the conference champs' auto invites, but no 1st rd bye.
 
I think 8 is about right and try to avoid rematches. 12 is just a money grab. Maybe once in a decade you need 12.
 
One thing this first year has shown is 12 teams is too many. They need to make it eight teams, make this week the first round, New Years Day the second round, and the Championship game a week later. Make it so the conference champions from the four big conferences are automatic entry, all undefeated teams from outside the power conferences get an automatic entry (at most it will be one in a year) and then the next highest ranked teams (according to one of the polls) round out the eight teams. Get seven bowl tie-ins and rotate them as the seven playoff games.

This year, you'd have:

(1) Oregon vs. (8) Ohio State
(4) Clemson vs. (5) Texas
(3) Arizona State vs. (6) Penn State
(2) Georgia vs. (7) Notre Dame

If a non-power conference school wants into the tournament? Sorry, you have to go undefeated or be ranked in the Top 8.
I said that when it was announced. Too many. People using the NCAA Basketball tournament as a reason to expand to 12 are just stupid!
Now we are stuck with first round, home games that will be a dull as the 4 we just saw this weekend. Some years it was hard enough to get a 4th great team but they went for the complete money grab and went to 12.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AdventureHasAName
I said that when it was announced. Too many. People using the NCAA Basketball tournament as a reason to expand to 12 are just stupid!
Now we are stuck with first round, home games that will be a dull as the 4 we just saw this weekend. Some years it was hard enough to get a 4th great team but they went for the complete money grab and went to 12.
Interesting argument. You want less teams making the playoffs. How does that help Rutgers? If the games are dull you can just do/watch something else.
 
Interesting argument. You want less teams making the playoffs. How does that help Rutgers? If the games are dull you can just do/watch something else.
Losing by 50 to the #6 team in the first round of the playoffs once every 30 years doesn't help Rutgers either.
 
More importantly, they need to cut the playoffs down to 6 teams (or go back to 4). No need to see uncompetitive teams play against the big boys.
That ship not only sailed, it sunk.
You're more likely to see teams added than subtracted .
2023 had the winner (Georgia) of the NC game score 63 against TCU's 3 in a 4 team playoff.
There will always be blowouts and teams playing like they didn't deserve to be included
examples
2016Playoff Semifinal at the Cotton Bowl Classic
No. 2 Alabama 38, No. 3 Michigan State 0

2017Playoff Semifinal at the Peach Bowl
No. 1 Alabama 24, No. 4 Washington 7
Playoff Semifinal at the Fiesta Bowl
No. 2 Clemson 31, No. 3 Ohio State 0

2019Playoff Semifinal at the Cotton Bowl Classic
No. 2 Clemson 30, No. 3 Notre Dame 3
and there always be fans and so called experts saying ( insert school's name here) didn't deserve to be chosen over ( inert school here).
You could say no matter how many are chosen, someone left out will be claimed a better choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rutgersguy1
That ship not only sailed, it sunk.
You're more likely to see teams added than subtracted .
2023 had the winner (Georgia) of the NC game score 63 against TCU's 3 in a 4 team playoff.
There will always be blowouts and teams playing like they didn't deserve to be included
examples
2016Playoff Semifinal at the Cotton Bowl Classic
No. 2 Alabama 38, No. 3 Michigan State 0

2017Playoff Semifinal at the Peach Bowl
No. 1 Alabama 24, No. 4 Washington 7
Playoff Semifinal at the Fiesta Bowl
No. 2 Clemson 31, No. 3 Ohio State 0

2019Playoff Semifinal at the Cotton Bowl Classic
No. 2 Clemson 30, No. 3 Notre Dame 3
and there always be fans and so called experts saying ( insert school's name here) didn't deserve to be chosen over ( inert school here).
You could say no matter how many are chosen, someone left out will be claimed a better choice.


 
  • Like
Reactions: MADHAT1
I said that when it was announced. Too many. People using the NCAA Basketball tournament as a reason to expand to 12 are just stupid!
Now we are stuck with first round, home games that will be a dull as the 4 we just saw this weekend. Some years it was hard enough to get a 4th great team but they went for the complete money grab and went to 12.
It's never a conversation with you without calling people stupid or just plain arguing,unreal, Lol
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT