Let's stop with the weather excuse. It's 28 degrees in Knoxville right now.
As for SMU, it gets into the 30's at night. The weather/cold argument is weak sauce.
It was a good set up before realignment which concentrated the best teams in 2 conferences. If the PAC and B12 existed as they were, Oregon, Texas, UGA, PSU would’ve been the top 4 seeds and there wouldn’t be an issue.I think they have to re-think the seeding format next year. Both, the conference match-ups or geographies in the quarter final rounds seem suspicious.
That's a great point and just getting to this point was brutal to begin with. Making changes now will take another five years of bickering and jockeying.It was a good set up before realignment which concentrated the best teams in 2 conferences. If the PAC and B12 existed as they were, Oregon, Texas, UGA, PSU would’ve been the top 4 seeds and there wouldn’t be an issue.
I think they have to re-think the seeding format next year. Both, the conference match-ups or geographies in the quarter final rounds seem suspicious.
Thanks for your spot forecast. You missed my point, overnight the low is predicted to be 33-35.It's 47 right now in Dallas.
Odds of a back to back all big ten national title are highSucks 2 B1G teams have to play each other in a Quarterfinal.
The SEC chanting by OSU fans is hilarious
You're right. I've been on the Oregon boards and they were pulling for Tenn and did not want to play OSU againOhio state -1.5 vs Oregon. Oregon can’t be happy with this draw
True, but I think that OSU was correctly seeded at 8.Sucks 2 B1G teams have to play each other in a Quarterfinal.
Only thing that would have made OSU routing Tenn better is if that douchnozzle Sean Mcdouough had been doing the play by play.
B1G is a bad conference? What does that make the mighty SEC and ACC?
So the #2, 3, or 4 B1G team beat the 3rd SEC and the 2nd ACC team.BIG hasn’t played the best SEC teams yet.
More importantly, they need to cut the playoffs down to 6 teams (or go back to 4). No need to see uncompetitive teams play against the big boys.I think they have to re-think the seeding format next year. Both, the conference match-ups or geographies in the quarter final rounds seem suspicious.
I said that when it was announced. Too many. People using the NCAA Basketball tournament as a reason to expand to 12 are just stupid!One thing this first year has shown is 12 teams is too many. They need to make it eight teams, make this week the first round, New Years Day the second round, and the Championship game a week later. Make it so the conference champions from the four big conferences are automatic entry, all undefeated teams from outside the power conferences get an automatic entry (at most it will be one in a year) and then the next highest ranked teams (according to one of the polls) round out the eight teams. Get seven bowl tie-ins and rotate them as the seven playoff games.
This year, you'd have:
(1) Oregon vs. (8) Ohio State
(4) Clemson vs. (5) Texas
(3) Arizona State vs. (6) Penn State
(2) Georgia vs. (7) Notre Dame
If a non-power conference school wants into the tournament? Sorry, you have to go undefeated or be ranked in the Top 8.
Interesting argument. You want less teams making the playoffs. How does that help Rutgers? If the games are dull you can just do/watch something else.I said that when it was announced. Too many. People using the NCAA Basketball tournament as a reason to expand to 12 are just stupid!
Now we are stuck with first round, home games that will be a dull as the 4 we just saw this weekend. Some years it was hard enough to get a 4th great team but they went for the complete money grab and went to 12.
Losing by 50 to the #6 team in the first round of the playoffs once every 30 years doesn't help Rutgers either.Interesting argument. You want less teams making the playoffs. How does that help Rutgers? If the games are dull you can just do/watch something else.
Nuts.Losing by 50 to the #6 team in the first round of the playoffs once every 30 years doesn't help Rutgers either.
Sure it does.Losing by 50 to the #6 team in the first round of the playoffs once every 30 years doesn't help Rutgers either.
That ship not only sailed, it sunk.More importantly, they need to cut the playoffs down to 6 teams (or go back to 4). No need to see uncompetitive teams play against the big boys.
2016 | Playoff Semifinal at the Cotton Bowl Classic No. 2 Alabama 38, No. 3 Michigan State 0 |
2017 | Playoff Semifinal at the Peach Bowl No. 1 Alabama 24, No. 4 Washington 7 | Playoff Semifinal at the Fiesta Bowl No. 2 Clemson 31, No. 3 Ohio State 0 |
2019 | Playoff Semifinal at the Cotton Bowl Classic No. 2 Clemson 30, No. 3 Notre Dame 3 |
That ship not only sailed, it sunk.
You're more likely to see teams added than subtracted .
2023 had the winner (Georgia) of the NC game score 63 against TCU's 3 in a 4 team playoff.
There will always be blowouts and teams playing like they didn't deserve to be included
examples
2016 Playoff Semifinal at the Cotton Bowl Classic
No. 2 Alabama 38, No. 3 Michigan State 0
2017 Playoff Semifinal at the Peach Bowl
No. 1 Alabama 24, No. 4 Washington 7Playoff Semifinal at the Fiesta Bowl
No. 2 Clemson 31, No. 3 Ohio State 0
and there always be fans and so called experts saying ( insert school's name here) didn't deserve to be chosen over ( inert school here).
2019 Playoff Semifinal at the Cotton Bowl Classic
No. 2 Clemson 30, No. 3 Notre Dame 3
You could say no matter how many are chosen, someone left out will be claimed a better choice.
It's never a conversation with you without calling people stupid or just plain arguing,unreal, LolI said that when it was announced. Too many. People using the NCAA Basketball tournament as a reason to expand to 12 are just stupid!
Now we are stuck with first round, home games that will be a dull as the 4 we just saw this weekend. Some years it was hard enough to get a 4th great team but they went for the complete money grab and went to 12.
The king of stupid has chimed in! 🤣🤣It's never a conversation with you without calling people stupid or just plain arguing,unreal, Lol