I’d doubt check this. It should have a roll/creep mode, much more natural this way
You don't the creep when there is near-instant acceleration.
I’d doubt check this. It should have a roll/creep mode, much more natural this way
Easy for you to say.You don't the creep when there is near-instant acceleration.
Charge overnight while you sleep.5 min refill?
To each their own. I like the cybertruck to the DeLorean car. Some people like the avant garde look. I actually think some of the features of the cybertruck will be pretty cool, but the look and the yoke are deal killers for me. No amount of discussion or convincing would convince me to change, but what works for me might not work for someone else. Consumer choice is a great thing. Tesla has a loyal group of customers, and that is great for Tesla.The cybertruck, like Kanye, is going to be popular with a subset of the population... for all the wrong reasons and the look (or lol) at me nature of it. Most others will stick to more practical things like the F150 and GMC.
Nothing on CT pricing.Has an updated price been revealed for the cybertruck?
For those that have been worried about when I get my Lightnining, according to the Norfolk Southern tracking system, it was in Harrisburg, PA at 2:30 this morning.
Seems the C suite at Tesla don't look to the Teslerati for advice on how to set pricing.Tesla shares closed down 1% after Elon Musk's EV firm cuts price of cars in China
Tesla cut the price of its Model 3 and Model Y in China, partly reversing price hikes earlier in the year.www.cnbc.com
didn’t Tesla just raised prices in the US?
It's been a few months since their last US price hike (spring 2022?), but they have been raising prices globally for 2 years. Looks like demand is waning at the current price points in China. Not sure why the hysteria in the stock. Prices are still at/near pre-pandemic levels. A majority of the EV commodity prices have fallen in the last few months as well. Lithium is still at insane levels, but steel, copper, nickel, aluminum, etc.. have come down significantly.Tesla shares closed down 1% after Elon Musk's EV firm cuts price of cars in China
Tesla cut the price of its Model 3 and Model Y in China, partly reversing price hikes earlier in the year.www.cnbc.com
didn’t Tesla just raised prices in the US?
Tesla has been a disrupter in the auto business which includes sales and pricing. Their dynamic pricing model is interesting but I wonder if it will work in the long run. Model 3 and Y should get a boost in the US with the federal tax credit.It's been a few months since their last US price hike (spring 2022?), but they have been raising prices globally for 2 years. Looks like demand is waning at the current price points in China. Not sure why the hysteria in the stock. Prices are still at/near pre-pandemic levels. A majority of the EV commodity prices have fallen in the last few months as well. Lithium is still at insane levels, but steel, copper, nickel, aluminum, etc.. have come down significantly.
stock prices still have a long way to go to falling back in line with reality. especially companies like tesla who have a lot of hype based investors who react to the smallest pieces of news, rather than paying attention to fundamentals.It's been a few months since their last US price hike (spring 2022?), but they have been raising prices globally for 2 years. Looks like demand is waning at the current price points in China. Not sure why the hysteria in the stock. Prices are still at/near pre-pandemic levels. A majority of the EV commodity prices have fallen in the last few months as well. Lithium is still at insane levels, but steel, copper, nickel, aluminum, etc.. have come down significantly.
I believe it was Warren Buffet who said "In the short term, the stock market is a voting machine, in the long term, a weighing machine"stock prices still have a long way to go to falling back in line with reality. especially companies like tesla who have a lot of hype based investors who react to the smallest pieces of news, rather than paying attention to fundamentals.
This is too dense for me. That’s why I’m hiring an electrician for this. I am reading a lot on the F150 lighting forum about the manual transfer switch and using the truck as a portable generator. This is significantly cheaper than the intelligent backup power. Plus, Sunrun is ghosting me.
You have a good electrician?This is too dense for me. That’s why I’m hiring an electrician for this. I am reading a lot on the F150 lighting forum about the manual transfer switch and using the truck as a portable generator. This is significantly cheaper than the intelligent backup power. Plus, Sunrun is ghosting me.
See? EVs are garbage!!! Who would want to own garbage????? 😜Seems Rivian is having a tonneau problems.
Rivian Temporarily Discontinues R1T's Powered Tonneau Cover Because It Keeps Breaking
For now, reservation holders will have to choose a manual tonneau that stows in the Gear Tunnel or none at all, and the powered one can't be optioned later.jalopnik.com
I just installed the Gator EFX cover yesterday. Took 25 min and was only $800. Will let you know if it flys off on the hwy.See? EVs are garbage!!! Who would want to own garbage????? 😜
And people wonder why I leave such large gaps to the car ahead of me. 😀I just installed the Gator EFX cover yesterday. Took 25 min and was only $800. Will let you know if it flys off on the hwy.
That's the hard trifold one? It's $699 on Amazon. Was there a reason you went for the trifold, and not a recoil one?I just installed the Gator EFX cover yesterday. Took 25 min and was only $800. Will let you know if it flys off on the hwy.
Yes, trifold for $699 (typo) on realtruck.com. No real reason other than I googled and this came up as best overall and easy to install. Did not get the extended and no ceramic coating. I called a place about ceramic coating but cheaped out. Big turnoff was hand wash only after the coating.That's the hard trifold one? It's $699 on Amazon. Was there a reason you went for the trifold, and not a recoil one?
Two other questions:
1. Did you do an extended warranty? This Ford Dealer has a good deal on them:
Ford Extended Warranty - Ford Protect
Buy Ford PremiumCare Extended Warranty at wholesale pricing. Pay just over dealer cost and receive genuine Ford Parts and service Coverage.grangerfordextendedwarranty.com
2. Did you do ceramic coating on your Lightning?
'It's a scam': Even after $100 billion, self-driving cars are going nowhere
Six years after companies started offering autonomous rides and almost 20 years after the first self-driving demos, there are few AVs on the road. Why?www.autoblog.com
How Far Can You Tow With an Electric Truck?
We hitched a 9,000-pound trailer to a 2021 Rivian R1T EV pickup to find out how towing affects range.www.motortrend.com
Enjoy your 90 mile range for towing. LOL! Wake me up when an EV Yukon Denali comes out with 420 HP, 400 mile range, and can fully refill in 5 mins.
Tech just not there yet.
If you're looking for a traditional pickup, or working a job site, the Lightning.
If you want an off-road adventure vehicle, it's the R1T. There's some gray areas in there, but that's the gist from what I've seen/heard.
Cybertruck is designed for both + throw in the pop culture appeal that it will bring. Most important, the Cybertruck will be a profitable vehicle for Tesla. Their track record of profitability speaks for itself with industry leading margins.
I could go into a long rant about production, but it wouldn't be anything I haven't said in the past. In a nutshell, hoping EVs/Tesla would go away was the wrong strategy and the cost of sitting on their hands for years continues to be evident for legacy auto. Can they make some great EVs? Yes. Can they reach profitable volume production? There is no evidence to suggest they can.
While I'm not a fan of calling the money spent a waste, I have to point out that the research for mapping the human genome and the research into fully automated driving are not particularly analogous things in terms of potential benefits or achievability.These articles make me laugh.
From 1990-2003 the US spent $3B mapping human DNA. Had someone used the above thought process in 2002 the money spent would have been considered a "waste". Fast forward 20 years and the return on this investment is estimated at over 3/4 of trillion dollars ($796B) or $141 dollars of return for every $1 spent on R+D. I am sure the exercise as is described in the above article regarding autonomous vehicles could be done/could have been done with scientific breakthroughs in personal computing, GPS technology, etc.
In 20 years I certainly believe that R+D being done today with autonomous/self driving vehicles will more than pay for today's investment. History is our best indicator of that belief.
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2013.13187
https://web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/project/economics.shtml
Does Tesla have a history of putting out shit products? Just the opposite, they're industry leading. Highly unlikely CT will be any different. Don't let personal bias blind you to the facts.Yeah, not really designed well "for both." Or either.
Will however be an interesting test case on the degree to which the world is as actively vapid and image-obsessed as it seems.
well, the many well documented instances of build quality issues with tesla's would support the idea that tesla has a history of putting out shit products...but you obvs don't want to acknowledge that.Does Tesla have a history of putting out shit products? Just the opposite, they're industry leading. Highly unlikely CT will be any different. Don't let personal bias blind you to the facts.
Does Tesla have a history of putting out shit products? Just the opposite, they're industry leading. Highly unlikely CT will be any different. Don't let personal bias blind you to the facts.
well, the many well documented instances of build quality issues with tesla's would support the idea that tesla has a history of putting out shit products...but you obvs don't want to acknowledge that.
1. I didn't say it was shit. I said it was not well-designed for either purpose you presented.
2. I don't have any bias. I like some Teslas, think the Cybertruck and yoke are fashion-over-function nonsense.
If you must be so defensive and/or accusatory in a simple discussion about future products, please aim for some vague accuracy.
While I'm not a fan of calling the money spent a waste, I have to point out that the research for mapping the human genome and the research into fully automated driving are not particularly analogous things in terms of potential benefits or achievability.
Mapping the human genome was considered an achievable goal. The thinking was that it was achievable, but would take a while. The time-estimates failed to properly factor in the exponential nature of Moore's law and its impact upon that specific research. And the potential benefits of the human genome project were (and still are) vast - probably well beyond our current understanding.
Whereas the potential benefits of fully automated driving, even when taking a highly optimistic view of potential outcomes, are numerous, but far more limited. And the achievability of fully automated driving without V2X are highly debatable. Some unbiased but qualified folks (i.e. those not trying to use it as a marketing/sales pitch) argue it's not achievable without V2X at all.
I think it's achievable even without V2X. But probably not for a long time due to certain physical constraints for the tech that aren't factors in CPU or GUP or DRAM development. Yes, the tech is improving very rapidly, but not as rapidly as the aforementioned technologies, which were all that was needed to greatly speed up the genome mapping solution.
Ultimately, I think a valid argument can be made that some of the research spending, that which is primarily focused upon achieving fully automated driving prior to the infrastructure development for V2X, could be considered inefficient as compared to instead being spent on development of that V2X infrastructure and V2X standards first. And then, all the spending on fully automated driving becomes much more efficient because the achievability becomes as well established as that for mapping the human genome.
You don't like the aesthetics of CT and are jumping to the conclusion that it's some PR stunt and only image obsessed, vapid people will own. That's not Tesla's product history. It's going to be a very useful, fun, efficient vehicle, just like the rest of their lineup with the exception that this one will look like it came off a sci-fi movie set That's all I'm saying.
so you admit that build quality blows...Well documented...lol
When you can't knock Tesla's range, powertrain efficiency, battery efficiency, thermal management, software and software updates, safety, charging network...etc, get the ruler out and measure millimeters on panel gaps. 👍
He did, although he’ll back out of it or downplay it some more.so you admit that build quality blows...
thanks!
Maybe GPS would be the better analogy. I'm not sure when the US was putting satellites in to space with this infant technology in the 60's and 70's anyone envisioned a $1.4T "product" that steers drivers in cities and on highways, helps packages get to their destinations efficiently, helps farmers plant crops and assists with power and telecommunications networks.
I guess my only point is while we are seemingly decades away from a "self driving country" I have little doubt that my 20 year old will live in a country where not only is that a reality, but also be a beneficiary of an industry/technology that generates trillions of dollars.
Tangentially, it is why I am angered (in my opinion) that the US is lagging countries like China and Germany in "clean tech". We ceded four years of head start in that industry to other nations (imo). There will certainly be the next "Google", the next "Microsoft" the next "Amazon" and yes the next "Tesla" in new and emerging industries. We may have lost leads we once had in industries we led in like automotive and steel, but we were never net importers at the onset of any significant industrial or technological industry. Clean tech may be the first. But I digress.