How dumb is Mickey Mouse to take out Lugo after a single inning and go with those 3 bums?
1) Re Oswalt, put on the post game show. I am sure Callaway will be asked that question. EDIT: As a public service I watched the post game. Callway's response for pinch-hitting Oswalt was that he wanted to score a run. Recall that he had a runner on third with one out, and Rosario did not drive him in. Callaway said that if he had, he would have let Oswalt hit.Was there a reason why Callaway pulled Oswalt after 59 pitches in the 5th? Is there any valid reason why Gsellman (former starting pitcher) couldn't go a second inning? And what's Callaway love for bringing in the relievers who give up big hits every chance they get?
3) To quote Donald Rumsfeld (a man whom I am not in the habit of quoting): "You go to war with the army you have, not the army you wish you had."
Callaway is over managing. Mets are batting something well below .200 with men in scoring position. Why not let the pitcher hit? Can't be any worse.1) Re Oswalt, put on the post game show. I am sure Callaway will be asked that question. EDIT: As a public service I watched the post game. Callway's response for pinch-hitting Oswalt was that he wanted to score a run. Recall that he had a runner on third with one out, and Rosario did not drive him in. Callaway said that if he had, he would have let Oswalt hit.
2) Gsellman was not in the game. Do you mean Lugo? If so, see (1). EDIT: I was wrong. Nobody asked him that question. Bad job by the interviewers.
3) To quote Donald Rumsfeld (a man whom I am not in the habit of quoting): "You go to war with the army you have, not the army you wish you had."
Callaway is over managing. Mets are batting something well below .200 with men in scoring position. Why not let the pitcher hit? Can't be any worse.
=You mean to tell me you can't find 2 or 3 dependable arms beside the bums they run out there every day?.
How dumb is Mickey Mouse to take out Lugo after a single inning and go with those 3 bums?
Would you want to play for Callaway? Wouldn't you prefer to sit on the DL rather than put up with the Muppet Show every day? Maybe these guys aren't as brittle as they let on.The manager is irrelevant. The talent and the brittleness of key players is the problem.
So, when guys were brittle last year and the year before that, they must have been channeling the future and based solely on their glimpse of future Callaway decided to, as you put it, stay on the DL then too. Got it. It's amazing how, when things go badly, following a sports team turns into reading weird conspiracy theories, like multiple players all deciding to stay on the DL even though they're healthy.Would you want to play for Callaway? Wouldn't you prefer to sit on the DL rather than put up with the Muppet Show every day? Maybe these guys aren't as brittle as they let on.
Yes. It happens with many, many teams. Every single team is competing to stock their bullpens with the best relievers, or at least better relievers than the other teams. And when that's all done, their is a hierarchy, and some teams are on top or toward the top, and others are lower or at the bottom. Reducing that effort to "you mean to tell me you can't find 2 or 3 dependable relievers" is silly. It's like saying, "You mean to tell me that you can't find just 1 more hit in 10 at bats and become a .300 hitter instead of a .200 hitter.". . . You mean to tell me you can't find 2 or 3 dependable arms beside the bums they run out there every day? . . . .
Frank Cashen, I always liked his bow tie,lol.Yet there are many examples of teams getting prospects who turned out to be excellent players through trades, or drafting good players, or trading for good veteran players.
The lesson from your day at the beach is not that teams won't trade good prospects. The lesson is to have someone other than Joe McIlvaine making your trades, or selecting your draft picks. Instead, hire someone like Frank Cashen who will draft Strawberry, Gooden and others and trade for Darling, HoJo, Hernandez, Carter and so on.
He was the best,no doubt.Also, he had respect around all of baseball.The guy could have worn a tutu for all I cared. When in his prime, he could stockpile the talent.
Nooooo,Familia to the Red Sox, we don't want to help the Yankees in any way shape or form,lol!!!:pray:MLB.com lead story today is "10 Players Whose Trade Stock is Rising". Familia was #1 and Cabrera was also stated. See below:
Jeurys Familia, Mets
The Mets closer is nearly perfect this month, allowing one hit and one walk while striking out six in seven scoreless July innings. The Mets seem unlikely to trade either of their big-name starters (Jacob deGrom and Noah Syndergaard), but Familia is headed for free agency, making him a near-lock to get moved. He's the best rental reliever on the market.
Potential fits: Astros, Red Sox
Asdrubal Cabrera, Mets
Cabrera has been on fire in July, slashing .293/.420/.634 with four home runs in 14 games this month. The teams that lost out in the Machado sweepstakes will turn to other infield options, and given that the versatile 32-year-old can play either middle infield spot, Cabrera figures to be attractive. He's also owed a little less than $4 million this season before becoming a free agent, giving the Mets reasons to move him.
Potential fits: Brewers, D-backs
Interesting that they consider Familia the best rental reliever on the market (ahead of Britton, Soria, etc.) Also interesting that they say Cabrera can play either middle infield spot. Perhaps they misspoke and meant "neither"? There is recent precedent for that sort of thing.
Very funny! But I think we are too hard on Familia. Maybe it's because the other guys had Rivera, and now Chapman, and we view that as the standard. But, like Addison Reed before him, Familia would serve the Bosox well as a setup guy. Familia would bring back a Reed-like return: a few mid-level prospects, but nothing special.Nooooo,Familia to the Red Sox, we don't want to help the Yankees in any way shape or form,lol!!!:pray:
https://www.prosportsdaily.com/Headlines/ExternalArticle?articleId=522486Very funny! But I think we are too hard on Familia. Maybe it's because the other guys had Rivera, and now Chapman, and we view that as the standard. But, like Addison Reed before him, Familia would serve the Bosox well as a setup guy. Familia would bring back a Reed-like return: a few mid-level prospects, but nothing special.
Not excited about Yo. Hope he proves me wrong.Yoenis is back! Let's see for how long. DH tonight. One D Smith up, one down. Oswalt also down.
There may be a nonzero chance of that, but it rounds to zero. The new GM would have to decide that Mick, after just one year, is not his guy. Possible, but unlikely. He's then have to decide that a guy currently managing in the Indy league IS his guy. You tell me how likely that is.Sandy, never liked Wally, so with Sandy gone, is there any chance Wally can come back to the Mets and we can shitcan the Mick?https://www.mlb.com/news/mets-announce-wally-backman-has-resigned/c-200971998
They can have Reyes for free. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:You know who they are, they only chirp after the fact,never putting themselves out there! My big hope this weekend is that the JV does it's small part to inch them closer to the EPIC FAIL.There's 11 days to their panic move, way over paying for their savor to get them to the finish line. Every Bosox win and Yankee loss moves them closer to that deal.
Hey, it's an American League game, so Mickey might not show his bad managerial skills.:pray:I will gladly take that Yankee Stadium HR by Cespedes lol.