How's that working out for you?To be truthful I'm a registered democrat. However at a national level I've voted for both democrats and republicans. In state and local elections I'm D all the way down.
The deal was hands off prevailing wage for pension/benefits reform. But the Democrats know the pension/HC benefits system is unfixable. They will talk, talk, talk, but at the end of the day, they will never fully fund it.To be honest Chris Christie has done some serious collateral damage to Teachers, Police and Government employees in general. He was very clever in splitting the democratic vote by throwing tens of millions in construction contracts and placating Steve Sweeney's wishes. In two years you'll have three serious contenders vying for Governor Phil Murphy, Steve Sweeney and Steve Fulop (sp). If north Jersey is to once again dominate politics in NJ they will need to whip Central Jersey's political bosses back in line. A Fulop or Murphy win is very bad news for Rutgers and Bob Barchi and everyone he brought in from Penn to facilitate the medical school merger. Stay away from politics it's a dirty business.
The problem with the Democrats is they had the numbers they needed and still didn't enact the legislation that their supporters want to see. It's not that they CAN'T do anything, it's that even when they can, they DON'T.OK I really have to know. How exactly can either party do anything without an absolute majority? In fact, that is the mentality of the teabaggers, they have no majority anywhere but a few state legilsatures so let's shut everything down...
You want change, vote for someone like Bernie Sanders AND someone in Congress who will take the money out of politics....
Actually if you look at what he proposes, it's not raising taxes, it is cutting loopholes for billionaires and out of control military spending.
The deal was hands off prevailing wage for pension/benefits reform. But the Democrats know the pension/HC benefits system is unfixable. They will talk, talk, talk, but at the end of the day, they will never fully fund it.
The Dems in Trenton have been running NJ into the ground since 2001 and have been kept in check with Christie as Gov. Watch what happens once Sweeney is elected - to RU, to our taxes, to our quality of life. And yes, I believe Norcross will get Sweeney elected. Norcross will have Sweeney on the Bergen, Essex, and Passiac party lines and he has recruited another Hudson County pol to run and take votes away from Fulop.
If you add the number of people who don't consider themselves a Democrat or a Republican, you get a number in between that of the Democrats and Republicans. It's a shame the representation in government isn't proportionate.Right now if you add the number of Libertarians voting to the number of Democrats, you get the number of Republicans.
24+92=116
He is clearly in favor of raising the top rate to 50% and has been quoted as saying he's willing to look at rates up to 90%. Check out the interview with John Harwood. That's on top of jacking up the capital gains rates.
http://www.thinkprogress.org/economy/2015/05/26/3662773/sanders-90-percent-tax/
And that STILL won't pay for all the programs he proposes.
"The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." - Margaret Thatcher
The money in your last sentence is no where close to generating what you think it will. Where else will you find money? How much is enough to take away from people? Very curious, what amount is the limit for you?
As for being mayor of a 42,000 person town, come on, not really comparable with being president of 300+ million people and a $3.5T budget.
As a general point, Republican nominations to the Supreme Court gave us Citizens United, so to say voting doesn't matter, well if you have any interest in keeping money out of politics, aside from McCain and maybe a handful of others, to be fair, maybe even Trump, all of the other Republicans are kissing the Koch/Adelson ring, which means tax cuts for billionaires and our defense decisions being decided by settlers in the West Bank. So it matters.
And frankly, I don't see what's very conservative about that....sounds like big government and the people getting steamrolled.
You seem to have this weird obsession with the Koch's and Adelson, yet you are silent about the George Soros' and Tom Steyer's who contribute to your side....seems like you have quite a big double standard.
Um...you do realize that Citizens United applies to all money right? So it effects you no matter who you donate to.
That said, George Soros and Steyer calling for more taxes and regulations only hurts them.
OTOH, the Kochs are donating strictly so they do not have to pay taxes. To the point in their home state of Kansas that schools cannot afford to stay open.
Sheldon Adelson cares only about Israel and banning online gambling. As a citizen of only the US, I find it extremely upsetting that he bribes our politicians to the point of the 23k/year per citizen we donate to a country with free healthcare and college for its citizens is considered anti-Israel if you don't vote for more and to let their leaders tell us how to conduct our foreign policy...doesn't sound like America First to me....and Rand Paul agrees and Christie was called out by Sheldon's thugs for calling the West Bank occupied...which it is considered by all governments in the world since 1967....
What would the reaction be to a dual American-Saudi or Iranian citizen who donated billions to politicians to keep them from criticizing those countries or in the case of Saudi to give them more money? Would that be OK? It would never happen but Republicans act like we should care what Adelson has to say.
Of course I realize that it both sides.
But my point is why do you only criticize the people on the right who donate money, but give a free pass to the people on the left?
You mean the same George Soros who was convicted of currency manipulationI am not giving them a free pass. Overturning Citizens United gives a free pass back to the people.
But do let me know when the causes of Soros and Steyer cause Kansas schoolchildren to be unable to continue to attend, or when they consult with foreign leaders about US foreign policy, because I will criticize them for it.
You mean the same George Soros who was convicted of currency manipulation
Not in the US. In "socialist" France and for insider trading.
Yet one of the Kochs lived in a rent controlled NYC apartment, and takes money from American schoolchildren.
And Sheldon Adelson admitting to bribing the Chinese government, yet we have to listen to him in international affairs?
That's the point of the whole thing....both sides do the same things...but it's very hypocritical to call out one side and not the other.
And by the way, who cares that it happened in France. He still did it