They play in the ACC, which is a slightly better version of the old Big East. Give them our schedule and let me know how they do, TIA.
I didn’t say that .So it’s ok they played them but not us
Doesn’t matter. Schiano was hired to be successful here. Doesn’t matter how Cuse would do here, nor does it matter how Rutgers would do in the ACC, or the MAC or whatever conference Wagner is in.They play in the ACC, which is a slightly better version of the old Big East. Give them our schedule and let me know how they do, TIA.
Yes we had some good and decent years post 2006. Last one was 2014. That’s too damn long to stink . It just isI used your 2006 reference ( And wonder why we haven’t had a team we could be proud of in 16 years) as the bases of my reply to you.
So when you imply Rutgers has been a loser since then, I implied RU wasn't a loser for some of the years after 2006, it just didn't win enough and go to the bowl games the fans wanted to see RU in and the minor bowls invited o weren't something that could be bragged about.
Before 2005 Ru was an embarrassment, after 2010 the same could be said , even though a bowl game was obtained in 2012,2013 & 2014 a lot of fans were still embarrassed and the bowl last year was because of academics.
Being in position to be invited didn't make fans satisfied..
This is the 3rd year of Greg2, so I won't panic that instant gradifiction hasn't come my way and won't be embarrassed because it hasn't
My bad it was another posterI didn’t say that .
I don’t have a problem playing wagner types and paying for a W
We wanted the Big 10 and we got it. If we didn’t know what we were getting into, now we know.. Cuse is getting the job done and that will have more i impact on recruits and transfer then being at the bottom of the Big 10. We r gonna have to up our gameThey play in the ACC, which is a slightly better version of the old Big East. Give them our schedule and let me know how they do, TIA.
The ACC has as many top 25 teams as the Big 10. 4 teamsThey play in the ACC, which is a slightly better version of the old Big East. Give them our schedule and let me know how they do, TIA.
This thread is comical. I'm hardly an apologist for Greg but I swear I went and saw us best them at Cuse last year.Pretty sure we beat cuse if we played them. At least it would be 50/50. So not worried about them "passing" us. Some of you guys need to chill out
JMU #25. Lol. Yeah those rankings are so smart.The ACC has as many top 25 teams as the Big 10. 4 teams
Please don’t overvalue the Big 10. It’s a top heavy conference every year and after the few top heavy schools. - it’s an ordinary conference just like every other conference
How many points are you “pretty sure” we would score in this “pretty sure” win ?Pretty sure we beat cuse if we played them. At least it would be 50/50. So not worried about them "passing" us. Some of you guys need to chill out
for those keeping score at home, all those 5 have head coaches with offense backgrounds. I’ve said it a hundred times and will say again, this is why our hire was a very poor choice. Aside from the Neanderthal playbook, it’s why we can’t get legit QB recruits. And don’t tell me about GW. Hasn’t proven he’s good yet.Wasn’t it not too long ago that programs like Syracuse / Kansas / Illinois / Maryland / Minnesota were at our level?
Cuse rebuild is in year 7. Kansas beat us by 40 under Ash. Based on schedule not sure Illinois is really that far ahead of us. Lockskey in year four is 9-24 in BIG. Schiano in 3 years is 5-16.Wasn’t it not too long ago that programs like Syracuse / Kansas / Illinois / Maryland / Minnesota were at our level?
65. I am as frustrated as anyone else with this offense but are you saying we don't have a quality defense?How many points are you “pretty sure” we would score in this “pretty sure” win ?
for those keeping score at home, all those 5 have head coaches with offense backgrounds. I’ve said it a hundred times and will say again, this is why our hire was a very poor choice. Aside from the Neanderthal playbook, it’s why we can’t get legit QB recruits. And don’t tell me about GW. Hasn’t proven he’s good yet.
They still areWasn’t it not too long ago that programs like Syracuse / Kansas / Illinois / Maryland / Minnesota were at our level?
Reading your tone is enough for me to promise you that you are a miserable douche.How many points are you “pretty sure” we would score in this “pretty sure” win ?
for those keeping score at home, all those 5 have head coaches with offense backgrounds. I’ve said it a hundred times and will say again, this is why our hire was a very poor choice. Aside from the Neanderthal playbook, it’s why we can’t get legit QB recruits. And don’t tell me about GW. Hasn’t proven he’s good yet.
1984…yes, I think the defense is solid. It holds up pretty well considering how inept the offense is. And I do give Schiano for having a big hand in the defense.65. I am as frustrated as anyone else with this offense but are you saying we don't have a quality defense?
He made a bold change. Give him that.
Let's see what we get before burning him at the stake?
Just a tad better scoring or lack of giving away points makes a big difference so far.
Yes Syracuse would smoke us this season. It actually comical that some Posters are so obsessed with Cuse they foolishly continue to post that we are better than them. Fact is we are not and it’s not even close.Yea and they would smoke us. Can you please post the picture or you doing arm curls?
Syracuse should have lost two earlier games, but the benefit of home cooking ref callsAnd now Cuse has lapped us. Can't wait til Greg builds this program the right way via his 5-6 year strategy. Good thing he's taking his time, because the more time he takes, the more amazing we'll be. Heck let's just give him 8 years until we become partially relevant!
We obviously have a brilliant coach - wait until every other college football fan around the country realizes what we all already know.
Stick to basketball. Another half assed fan that has no idea what they are talking about.Wasn’t it not too long ago that programs like Syracuse / Kansas / Illinois / Maryland / Minnesota were at our level?
Ahahahahahaha - have you ever looked at their schedule? Answer this. Would your rather play their schedule or ours this far? What about balance of season. You are Falling into the trap of only looking at their record and thinking it must be the 60s again.Yes Syracuse would smoke us this season. It actually comical that some Posters are so obsessed with Cuse they foolishly continue to post that we are better than them. Fact is we are not and it’s not even close.
Will things change next season ? We certainly hope so or questions will arise on the ability of Greg 2.0
Amazing how many of our so called fans took every game played today to take a shot at RU. What a bunch of assholes on this board.
I’m a Dino fan but I think it’s important to let people know this is year 7 at Cuse and 4 of them have had losing records and 5 of 6 years he’s had a losing ACC record.
Facts don't matter to self-loathing ahole "fans" that contribute nothing but negativity to the program.I’m a Dino fan but I think it’s important to let people know this is year 7 at Cuse and 4 of them have had losing records and 5 of 6 years he’s had a losing ACC record.
Rutgers has 13 players from Florida, Virgina and Kentucky. Facts matter except when they don't matter.15 players just from FL - more from GA, TX, SC, NC
SU hitting southern states pretty well
South barely exists at RU
I don’t want him as OC but I like the OC he picked up this year, Leach tree guy and long time Mendenhall OC Robert Anae. His DC is decent as well.I as well am a Dino fan (was hoping he'd get fired and be an OC candidate).
Yes it's Year 7 but it's not like this is the first signs of success.
Year 3 (2018) they went 10-3 (6-2), finished #15 and I believe they would have gone to the Orange Bowl as ACC #2 if Orange wasn't part of CFP that year.
Ended up beating a weakened WV (multiple players opted out for the draft).
Well, if you look on paper…we have been out recruiting them.And we aren’t. You know why? Because we can’t recruit, we don’t have good coaches, and this program is literally doomed.
Happy for Syracuse and the losers on this board who are obsessed with them.
The both have capable offenses thoughThe significance of Syracuse, or Illinois, being ranked has nothing to do with who would beat who this year. We beat Syracuse last year. It's that you don't need OSU-level facilities and a war chest of $10 million in NIL money to be competitive and get ranked 15 to 25. I doubt either of those teams is loaded with talent compared to us.
Yeah that was last year. They'd whoop us this year. What a difference a year makes. They lose to us and the next year catapult into the Top 20 while we go in the other directionDidn't we beat them?e thinks it has something to do with quality of acc than anything else.
Rutgers has 13 players from Florida, Virgina and Kentucky. Facts matter except when they don't matter.
4 of Cuse 6 wins are to P5 teams. We are 1-3 against P5's. They beat Purdue who is the top Big10 team in the west. Not sure what people are seeing.Ahahahahahaha - have you ever looked at their schedule? Answer this. Would your rather play their schedule or ours this far? What about balance of season. You are Falling into the trap of only looking at their record and thinking it must be the 60s again.
We are not behind cuse.
They will win 1 more game
Syracuse's schedule so far is pretty soft but so is ours besides Ohio State, so excuses about our tough schedule don't fly. The team could be 5-1 with even an average offense but it would not have beaten anyone great. Syracuse has the hard part of their season coming up and almost certainly will fall out of the rankings.4 of Cuse 6 wins are to P5 teams. We are 1-3 against P5's. They beat Purdue who is the top Big10 team in the west. Not sure what people are seeing.
agree. Indiana Minny Mich st are all beatable too. This idea that the Big 10 is so much better than everyone. I dont see it. I just see it as top heavy.T
Syracuse's schedule so far is pretty soft but so is ours besides Ohio State, so excuses about our tough schedule don't fly. The team could be 5-1 with even an average offense but it would not have beaten anyone great. Syracuse has the hard part of their season coming up and almost certainly will fall out of the rankings.
This year. NIL hasn’t really kicked in the way it will yet.The significance of Syracuse, or Illinois, being ranked has nothing to do with who would beat who this year. We beat Syracuse last year. It's that you don't need OSU-level facilities and a war chest of $10 million in NIL money to be competitive and get ranked 15 to 25. I doubt either of those teams is loaded with talent compared to us.
I'm not sure teams like Syracuse will ever have much NIL money with which to buy great players. Does Syracuse have tons of well-heeled boosters ready to write 6 and 7 figure checks for salaries? I suspect NIL will be largely the domain of the rich and famous, who already get the best recruits. It might not change much in the pecking order except to make it even more expensive for the bluebloods to fight over trophies.This year. NIL hasn’t really kicked in the way it will yet.