Update: The officer called and told me all of the kids involved are being charged with noise violations and being at a party w/ alcohol while underage.
I'm all for cops and firemen in towns like NYC or Newark or Camden getting paid well because its dangerous. In our quiet little town of shore homes with a non summer population of about 15,000 there are almost 100 cops and fireman making over 90K per year.
If they did not catch her with a drink in hand or have her take a breathalyzer and just had you pick her up...what the hell did she do wrong in any legal sense and even as a 18 y/o, it was a party where parents where there.
Constructive possession is the legal term. I don't have time to post more but you can google it.
POSSESSION (N.J.S.A. 2C:2-1) Constructive possession means possession in which the possessor does not physically have the item on his or her person but is aware that the item is present and is able to exercise intentional control or dominion over it. So, someone who has knowledge of the character of an item and knowingly has both the power and the intention at a given time to exercise control over it, either directly or through another person or persons, is then in constructive possession of that item.
I call "bullshit" on the cops in this particular case, assuming the kid in question is telling the truth. There's no way they can prove constructive possession absent direct testimony.
They probably could fight it but is it worth the expense and time? Also you never know when you are going to have a judge/jury who sympathetic to the police and you lose. A cop could say he witnessed her with a beer cup. They could also cut a deal with another person to testify they saw he pick up a beer. Then it her word against their word. Are you willing to go after that to save 4 hours volunteering at a soup kitchen?
Under the definition of constructive possession above, it would seem that all that would have to be mentioned was that she was there. She is 18 so an adult. Had knowledge there was drinking going on. Could have done something but chose not to. It seems that fits the definition exactly as written above. She would not have to be caught with a drink, a cup or anything.If the cop was going to be able to testify that he saw her with an alcoholic beverage, then it would have to be in his report. Similarly, if another witness were going to testify that she was seen with an alcoholic beverage, then it would have to be in the report.
In muni court, the incident report is the bible. It's how the wheels of muni justice are greased. If it's not in the report, then it can't be testified to, after the fact.
The bottom line is that if the OP gets hold of the incident report and his kid isn't mentioned in it, then there's no reason why she should have to endure getting screwed by the cops.
You could fight it. And maybe it's worth consulting an attorney that could advise of you how to approach doing the community service without any admission of guilt. Which may or may not matter.thats exactly the term he used. Not worth hiring a lawyer or wasting my time over 4 hours of community service.
People are too hung up on the legalities here, IMO. Going through life hoping to get away with stuff because of technicalities is not a great idea, to my way of thinking.
She claims to have not committed a crime. No one know for certain that is the case.She didn't commit a crime.
Perhaps not. But I'm pretty sure the OP stated that she may have intended to have a drink and just didn't get around to it by the time the cops showed up.She didn't commit a crime.
Perhaps not. But I'm pretty sure the OP stated that she may have intended to have a drink and just didn't get around to it by the time the cops showed up.
Ha ha - I like the movie reference. So yeah, that's not a horrible way to handle it either.Yeah but this isn't Minority Report.
Personally, if this was me (not my kid, but me) I would call the police and would request a copy of the officer's report to see what crime I committed. If I committed a crime, I'll do the four hours of cleaning cop cars. If not, I'll do my own charity work on my own time.
Sorry if I may have missed it earlier, but will this end up on her permanent record? May hurt her when trying to land a job?thats exactly the term he used. Not worth hiring a lawyer or wasting my time over 4 hours of community service.
The cops in this town and most other NJ towns should be told if they want to keep their salary and pension they can transfer to Newark, Camden, Paterson, etc. If not they can take a deduction to what other public servants without college educations make for the backbreaking job of taking Mike's Hard from 18 year olds and tattling on them to to their parents.
They can start with these officers...
http://www.nj.com/monmouth/index.ssf/2016/02/8_long_branch_officers_suspended_for_not_adequatel.html
Your little town has a PAID fire department? That is mind boggling.I'm all for cops and firemen in towns like NYC or Newark or Camden getting paid well because its dangerous. In our quiet little town of shore homes with a non summer population of about 15,000 there are almost 100 cops and fireman making over 90K per year.
Your little town has a PAID fire department? That is mind boggling.
If I was younger, I would consider hanging up what I am doing and applying down there. 24 hour shifts. A family could live like a squire down there (outside of OC) on that salary and the benefits.Yeah, they drowned one of their trucks in the storm 2 weeks ago. I posted a pic of it, remember? They have a full compliment of about 60 and run EMS as well as fire.
If I was younger, I would consider hanging up what I am doing and applying down there. 24 hour shifts. A family could live like a squire down there (outside of OC) on that salary and the benefits.
There ya go. Good news. See if she can do the 4 hours at the library reshelving books.thats exactly the term he used. Not worth hiring a lawyer or wasting my time over 4 hours of community service.
That would be ironic, since there are shots fired in the 2-5 every day.