ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Why are Hybrids so unpopular in the US?

How is it possible to knkw your mpg at 100 mph ??
RU4Real is a nut who considers 100mph 'putting around on a Sunday'. He just checks his Audi's computer because that's his average speed including time spent at stoplights.
 
If you own a prius, you are most certainly a douche bag. They are the ugliest cars on the planet. You have to be douche bag to buy one, carbon footprint be damned. They were designed that way to discourage any normal human from buying one.

If you disagree with me, drive behind one for 5+ miles, then let me know....
 
The reason I hate them is because most of the owners are phony. Research says more then 80% of buyers say the fact that the car looks odd or different than regular cars is important - meaning I want people to know that I'm driving such a car. Show offs. Why would you want an ugly car, with less safety due to their smaller size and chance of fire just so people think you save the environment? Wasting money is another thing - You can buy a Chevy that gets 45mph for 19k but you would spend 40 on a Volt? Its idiotic and a waste! F those cars! I drive Porsche's with 5 and 6 speeds...
Prius, Ford C-Max, soon to be defunct Honda CRZ. These are the only exclusively hybrid cars. The rest of them you can barely tell them apart from their gas-powered brethren, unless you look for the little hybrid badge. How the heck are these people showing-off?
 
America has a lot of electricity capacity. What is happening now is that dirtier, coal-fired power plants are being replaced by cleaner natural gas and by even cleaner wind and solar energy. This is happening only partly because of environmental regulation; the market place is also forcing the transition because natural gas is much cheaper than coal on an equivalent basis, and the price of renewables is coming down sharply. So the electricity needed for plug-ins will increasingly come from clean sources. Of course, most hybrids are not plug-ins yet, but instead rely on a gasoline-burning engine charging a battery.

I don't know specifically about the hybrid SUVs, but I really don't hear stories about the battery failing.
Thank you!
 
Going to ask a dumb question. If we were to switch over to mostly hybrid cars that needed charging, do we have the infrastructure to do so? Would we (& how) be able to generate enough electricity without negating the positives of hybrid technology?
Not flaming it's what always comes to mind with this particular topic.

Also, a few years back (before divorce) the ex & I were researching a Lexus SUV hybrid. The initial cost, potential repair & higher insurance seemed to equivocate purchasing a gasoline powered SUV.

I work with a company that does, among other things, power engineering studies. Recently, they were asked to perform a study for a California electric utility company. The study focused on the impact of electric vehicles on the current power grid. They studied several suburban areas. In every one of those areas, the current grid would fail with a 50% EV adoption rate. Specifically the failures occurred overnight when everyone is charging their vehicles. The good news is that we are unlikely to see a 50% EV adoption rate for some time and the grid will be upgraded gradually in anticipation. However, today's power grid is woefully unprepared for electric vehicles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ManasquanMike
When I plan to purchase my electric car A will have solar panels and backup battery storage to mitigate grid issues.

Full plan is to be completely off the grid
 
IMO hybrid is the near future with electric cars being the future.

The advantage of hybrids are the greater fuel efficiency without relying on setting up an electric charging station at home. Too many Americans live in rentals, garden apartments, high rises, and other places without the ability to install an electric charging station.

Plus it uses the traditional fuel engine that is already mass produced. For many performance cars hybrid is already used (ie. Acura NSX)
http://www.autobytel.com/top-10-cars/high-horsepower-cars/hybrid-cars/

Within 10-15 years I can see almost all cars going to some kind of hybrid technology to meet fuel standards while also showing good horsepower / torque. Right now the Lexus NX hyrbid (small SUV) gets 194 horsepower and about 30 miles per gallon. With the next generation can Lexus improve by 10-20% to get to 225 hp and 36 mpg? At the same time would a Camry hybrid have the same engine for similar performance?

The future in my mind is electric cars (ie. Teslas). Once the infrastructure is built out and the batteries become capable of 400+ miles they will be the norm. Electric can be cheaper than oil and produced by various means (ie. wind, solar, water, nuclear, etc..). The oil industry needs to adopt this and add charging stations to gas stations. You may also see many shopping plazas install them. If it takes 20 mins to replenish an e car why shouldn't a supermarket, bookstore, or coffee shop install them in their parking lot to bring customers in who have 20 mins to kill. For the e cars I think it may take 20-25 years and probably will be spurred by gas prices spiking again.
 
Last edited:
Going to ask a dumb question. If we were to switch over to mostly hybrid cars that needed charging, do we have the infrastructure to do so? Would we (& how) be able to generate enough electricity without negating the positives of hybrid technology?
Not flaming it's what always comes to mind with this particular topic.

Also, a few years back (before divorce) the ex & I were researching a Lexus SUV hybrid. The initial cost, potential repair & higher insurance seemed to equivocate purchasing a gasoline powered SUV.

Hybrids like the Prius are not "electric" cars. They generate their own electricity to charge their own batteries. There's never any need to plug them in for charging.
 
IMO hybrid is the near future with electric cars being the future.

The advantage of hybrids are the greater fuel efficiency without relying on setting up an electric charging station at home. Too many Americans live in rentals, garden apartments, high rises, and other places without the ability to install an electric charging station.

Plus it uses the traditional fuel engine that is already mass produced. For many performance cars hybrid is already used (ie. Acura NSX)
http://www.autobytel.com/top-10-cars/high-horsepower-cars/hybrid-cars/

Within 10-15 years I can see almost all cars going to some kind of hybrid technology to meet fuel standards while also showing good horsepower / torque. Right now the Lexus NX hyrbid (small SUV) gets 194 horsepower and about 30 miles per gallon. With the next generation can Lexus improve by 10-20% to get to 225 hp and 36 mpg? At the same time would a Camry hybrid have the same engine for similar performance?

The future in my mind is electric cars (ie. Teslas). Once the infrastructure is built out and the batteries become capable of 400+ miles they will be the norm. Electric can be cheaper than oil and produced by various means (ie. wind, solar, water, nuclear, etc..). The oil industry needs to adopt this and add charging stations to gas stations. You may also see many shopping plazas install them. If it takes 20 mins to replenish an e car why shouldn't a supermarket, bookstore, or coffee shop install them in their parking lot to bring customers in who have 20 mins to kill. For the e cars I think it may take 20-25 years and probably will be spurred by gas prices spiking again.

Nice work here, RUFINAL!
 
When I plan to purchase my electric car A will have solar panels and backup battery storage to mitigate grid issues.

Full plan is to be completely off the grid

Cool, man. I have 48 solar panels on my roof, and we generate more than we use (and sell the unused stuff back to the power company). I'm not off the grid, we still rely on the grid when there's no sunlight, but halfway there I guess. No electric bills, at least.
 
There is currently more oil in known reserve than has been extracted in history.

In the words of Warner Wolf, if you had peak oil and anytime before 2100, you were wrong
There probably is more oil bubbling up from the bottom of the oceans of the world than we extract daily.
 
Cool, man. I have 48 solar panels on my roof, and we generate more than we use (and sell the unused stuff back to the power company). I'm not off the grid, we still rely on the grid when there's no sunlight, but halfway there I guess. No electric bills, at least.
What will you do when you need a new roof installed?
 
There probably is more oil bubbling up from the bottom of the oceans of the world than we extract daily.

Yeah, there's still tons of it left. Remember the days when people were saying stuff like "We only have enough oil left for 20 years at most!"

I'm an advocate of developing renewables, but there's so much oil and coal that we shouldn't turn our backs on them...
 
What will you do when you need a new roof installed?

Sorry for derailing the thread.

We had a new roof put on, rated for a lot of years, just before the panels went up. So it's not going to be my problem. But it's a legit question. The entire array will have to be removed and then re-installed. Probably a few thousand bucks extra cost there.
 
I rented a diesel Ford Mondeo in Europe for two weeks and it was far better on gas mileage than I could've imagined. It also did what all of the cars seem to do over there and never do here: it went into a partial shut down mode at a full stop and then started up again when you stepped on the gas, which no doubt was one of the reason it was so fuel efficient. The car offerings in this country are not good.

My Audi Q5 has that feature. It is actually not so much for fuel saving but more for emissions. When engines run cold, especially diesel engines, they have high emissions, particularly NOx. Unfortunately, because of the VW/Audi diesel debacle, diesel seems more dead in the US than ever before. The diesel engine has many benefits over gasoline--higher fuel efficiency, lower emissions, better torque and power. Unfortunately, many in the US view diesels as having higher emissions, which is not the case. My Q5 TDI averages 31 mpg in mixed driving compared to the 22 mpg I got with the same car in a gasoline version. But the premium price for the diesel engine is high, somewhat similar to the hybrid.
 
Are they unpopular? I see quite a few around here. Not unusual to see a 100 thousand plus mile Prius.
 
Are they unpopular? I see quite a few around here. Not unusual to see a 100 thousand plus mile Prius.

I wouldn't say they are unpopular, personally. What they are is polarizing. The same can be said for my solar panels.

I have no idea how alternative energy became such a popular political litmus test, but it has.

When I tell some people about my solar panels, their hackles go up and they get defensive and sometimes nasty. It's a strange knee-jerk reaction, and I've gotten so I can predict who will be that way. Same thing for the Prius, I think (although I don' t have one, but I still see the same pattern)...

tl;dnr -- Why is renewable energy = "liberal" and gas/oil = "conservative" ?
 
Last edited:
I mostly hate the hybrids that are out there. But there are a few I wouldn't mind owning. Here's one:

Porsche-918-Spyder-2.jpg
 
Looking at the Camry and hybrid version (assume gas is $2.25 a gallon and prices are for base models MSRP):
Hybrid priced at $26790 and gets 40 mpg 5.6 cents a mile
Regular priced at $23070 and gets 30 mpg 7.5 cents a mile

The price difference is $3720 which would take 195,789 miles to break even.
For a avg driver who puts on 15k miles a year it would take 13 years to break even.

if gas goes to $3.00 a gallon:
Hybrid is 7.5 cents a mile
Regular is 10 cents a mile
The break even would be after 148,800 miles which is about 10 years at 15k miles a year
 
  • Like
Reactions: megadrone
Looking at the Camry and hybrid version (assume gas is $2.25 a gallon and prices are for base models MSRP):
Hybrid priced at $26790 and gets 40 mpg 5.6 cents a mile
Regular priced at $23070 and gets 30 mpg 7.5 cents a mile

The price difference is $3720 which would take 195,789 miles to break even.
For a avg driver who puts on 15k miles a year it would take 13 years to break even.

if gas goes to $3.00 a gallon:
Hybrid is 7.5 cents a mile
Regular is 10 cents a mile
The break even would be after 148,800 miles which is about 10 years at 15k miles a year

The battery packs would have to be replaced in either of these use cases.
 
Looking at the Camry and hybrid version (assume gas is $2.25 a gallon and prices are for base models MSRP):
Hybrid priced at $26790 and gets 40 mpg 5.6 cents a mile
Regular priced at $23070 and gets 30 mpg 7.5 cents a mile

The price difference is $3720 which would take 195,789 miles to break even.
For a avg driver who puts on 15k miles a year it would take 13 years to break even.

if gas goes to $3.00 a gallon:
Hybrid is 7.5 cents a mile
Regular is 10 cents a mile
The break even would be after 148,800 miles which is about 10 years at 15k miles a year

Yeah, that's about what I found, although I didn't do the math as thoroughly as you. My conventional car gets 38-40 mph and costs half what a Prius costs (I paid 13K for my Toyota Yaris). It just didn't make sense to me.

I had an Audi A4 before the Yaris, and realized that for me, the driving experience isn't important. I'm just as happy in the little economy car. Some of you are more sophisticated and can appreciate fine driving, so you have a completely different perspective from mine, I suppose.
 
@AreYouNUTS enough with that crap man. The election is over - and why objectify those women?

Back to the topic, will be interesting when Tesla releases their moderately priced Model 3 - a hybrid that rides like a premium car. That could be the catalyst that pushes electric cars more mainstream.

@RUBeta - relax, it's funny, sorry if you don't have a sense of humor. "Objectify"? They're women who are in the limelight, every day of their lives, it's okay to say that one is prettier than the other! [cheers]
 
I wouldn't say they are unpopular, personally. What they are is polarizing. The same can be said for my solar panels.

I have no idea how alternative energy became such a popular political litmus test, but it has.

When I tell some people about my solar panels, their hackles go up and they get defensive and sometimes nasty. It's a strange knee-jerk reaction, and I've gotten so I can predict who will be that way. Same thing for the Prius, I think (although I don' t have one, but I still see the same pattern)...

tl;dnr -- Why is renewable energy = "liberal" and gas/oil = "conservative" ?

This is a very good point. It's weird how polarizing it's become and how people on both sides abandon or adjust longstanding positions to support or oppose renewable energy, EVs, etc.

That said, hybrids make up about 2 - 3 percent of the US auto market, averaging a little over 400,000/ sales per year over the past few years. I'd say low penetration is some mix of cost, light hybrids not being all that impressive in fuel economy, higher fuel economy hybrids being dominated by small cars that don't meet everyone's needs, and many buyers not even considering anything with the word "hybrid" on it. Remember this is a market where the best-selling vehicle is a pickup truck, and people fell in love (and are falling in love all over again) with huge 4x4 SUVs they had no particular need for. The Ford F-Series basically doubles hybrid sales on its own. Fuel economy has become one buying consideration, but it clearly isn't first priority for much of the market.

For a while, I was waiting to see automakers offer different powertrains - gas, hybrid, electric, etc. - for each individual model, but not sure that'll ever happen. It's happened with a few models, the new EPA champ Hyundai Ioniq being one good example, but doesn't seem to be happening quick enough to compete with the pace of other technologies (better EV batteries, fuel cells, etc).
 
I rented a diesel Ford Mondeo in Europe for two weeks and it was far better on gas mileage than I could've imagined. It also did what all of the cars seem to do over there and never do here: it went into a partial shut down mode at a full stop and then started up again when you stepped on the gas, which no doubt was one of the reason it was so fuel efficient. The car offerings in this country are not good.
It took me a few days to realize the engine cutting out at stops was a designed economizer mode. Another thing you notice about petrol stations is the filling areas are black with diesel residue. Love the mileage you can get when driving diesels, especially when you pay those high fuel prices.
 
When I plan to purchase my electric car A will have solar panels and backup battery storage to mitigate grid issues.

Full plan is to be completely off the grid

Just get a diesel and modify it to run on cooking oil. A buddy of mine did this to his Mercedes diesel. Dude gets his "fuel" from the used oil from a sushi joint.
 
Just get a diesel and modify it to run on cooking oil. A buddy of mine did this to his Mercedes diesel. Dude gets his "fuel" from the used oil from a sushi joint.

Maybe when I retire. Collecting used cooking oil and filtering it is a lot of work.
 
Yes, I'm avoiding talking about the latest stomping.

So is there any particular reason why hybrids sell so poorly here in the US aside from the increased cost (which I believe should be somewhat offset by the savings in gasoline)?

I haven't had much experience driving them other than a rental Prius which Was horrendous, but then I think the overwhelming majority of Toyota models drive like crap.

I mean, why would you want to burn more gas than you have to?
They're unsafe. Yes, you can save on gas, but a better idea is to have energy policies that make gas cheap. I don't want my family driving around a NJ highway in a clown car.
 
It took me a few days to realize the engine cutting out at stops was a designed economizer mode. Another thing you notice about petrol stations is the filling areas are black with diesel residue. Love the mileage you can get when driving diesels, especially when you pay those high fuel prices.

I was amazed to notice that in Europe they don't have what California and New Jersey and maybe some other places have had for decades: nozzles that are designed to keep fumes from escaping while cars are filling up. That probably leads to the black residue and it certainly allows a lot of hydrocarbons to go into the air before ever reaching the tank.
 
Looking at the Camry and hybrid version (assume gas is $2.25 a gallon and prices are for base models MSRP):
Hybrid priced at $26790 and gets 40 mpg 5.6 cents a mile
Regular priced at $23070 and gets 30 mpg 7.5 cents a mile

The price difference is $3720 which would take 195,789 miles to break even.
For a avg driver who puts on 15k miles a year it would take 13 years to break even.

if gas goes to $3.00 a gallon:
Hybrid is 7.5 cents a mile
Regular is 10 cents a mile
The break even would be after 148,800 miles which is about 10 years at 15k miles a year

I have a 2007 Camry Hybrid, which I bought in December 2006. At the time, I received a $2300 tax credit, which puts a nice dent in the math you did. Mine did not come with all of the possible bells and whistles, but cost a few thousand dollars more than your figure.
 
1) The people who would benefit most from hybrids are lower income people who can't afford to purchase new cars/hybrids.

2) Right now gas prices are $2.25 give or take. FU Chrste and the gas tax but still prices are relatively low. Heard before that the demand for hybrids soars as gas prices increases. When gas prices are high I've heard of months and months of waits for hybrid.
At $2.25 most aren't going to save any money-at least short term.

3) A lot of people with kids like and "need" larger vehicles.

4) Too a lesser extent image. Some like sports cars and those with small manhood like big trucks or vans.

5) I would also say there are many cars that get decent mileage for those who caqn't afford hybrids or are environmental conscous. Toyota Corollas always seem to get gas mileage (was my first car and until is got hit at 190,000 the car ran great. broke down at 210,000 and couldn't afford to repair so it sat until there would have been too many problems. Sold in 2014 to pay for my football seat donation.
 
Hybrids make a lot more sense for trucks, SUV, Vans, and crossovers with current gas prices.IMHO.

Plug ins are the future however.
 
Hybrids make a lot more sense for trucks, SUV, Vans, and crossovers with current gas prices.IMHO.

Plug ins are the future however.

Those are all different things with different use cases.

Hybrid solutions are strongly recommended for predominantly local use vehicles and the larger ones (SUVs & crossovers) benefit more because the weight of the battery pack is a smaller percentage of their overall mass.

"Trucks" are a different story. Local delivery trucks, yes. Long-haul, not so much. The hybrid advantage goes to zero as travel distance increases because the systems use engine braking to recharge the batteries.

The optimal technology for long-haul, heavy vehicles (trucks and buses) is electric drive with turbine range extenders.
 
Hybrids make a lot more sense for trucks, SUV, Vans, and crossovers with current gas prices.IMHO.

Plug ins are the future however.

I agree. If a particular SUV averages 25 mpg with a conventional engine, the hybrid version may be able to get it over 30 mpg. Since families like to use SUVs for the road trips, driving vacations, and such the gas mileage increase can help. A family of 2 adults and 2 high school aged kids is not likely to take a Prius for a 1 week family vacation that they drive to when they have a Honda Pilot or Nissan Pathfinder (both are 27 mph highway) also.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT