Sandy and Katrina were not considered major? Just asking. There were a couple of more sprinkled in there too.There has not been a major U.S. landfalling hurricane since Wilma in 2005. 131 months. This is a record for the longest period of time between major landfalls.
There has not been a major U.S. landfalling hurricane since Wilma in 2005. 131 months. This is a record for the longest period of time between major landfalls.
Katrina was 2005 before Wilma in 2005Sandy and Katrina were not considered major? Just asking. There were a couple of more sprinkled in there too.
Sandy and Katrina were not considered major? Just asking. There were a couple of more sprinkled in there too.
Thanks. Always learn something new on this board.Katrina was pre-Wilma. Sandy was not a major hurricane. Technically, Sandy wasn't even an actual hurricane when it made landfall.
It wasn't considered a major hurricane. The damage that ensued was due to overdevelopment.K. So was Sandy just not considered major?
There has not been a major U.S. landfalling hurricane since Wilma in 2005. 131 months. This is a record for the longest period of time between major landfalls.
3 whole trees, and a fence? Your roof stayed on your house, correct?Spending 10 days without electricity, losing 3 large trees and having to replace my fence because one of those tress smashed it to smithereens was pretty darn major to me.
.
3 whole trees, and a fence? Your roof stayed on your house, correct?
There has not been a major U.S. landfalling hurricane since Wilma in 2005. 131 months. This is a record for the longest period of time between major landfalls.
I'm sure the people wiped out or killed by Sandy, the biggest storm ever seen in the Atlantic, are cheered by the fact that it wasn't technically a hurricane when it hit land.
Why doesn't Hurricane Irene count?
This is a semantics issue. There have been a number of powerful storms during hurricane season that have caused major damage to life and property. That's generally all people care about.
However, whether or not a storm was scientifically a "hurricane" does carry contractual importance in certain instances.
It's not so much a semantics issue as a "missing the point" issue. The record - and the noting, thereof - isn't about how much damage storms do, it's about the meteorology and is specifically limited to the intensity of the storm.
The last Cat 3+ storm to make landfall in the U.S. was Wilma. Further anecdotes, such as @brgRC90's breathless comments about the number of people killed by Sandy (zero, in the U.S.) are tangential.
What is important or interesting about the meteorological distinction?
What is important or interesting about the meteorological distinction?
It makes a statement about the overall climatology.
AlGore (among others) promised us that global warming would lead to bigger, more powerful storms. The history of Atlantic basin hurricanes over the last decade has show this to not be the case. What it tells us is that there are greater dynamics at work than just average global temperature and that it's unrealistic to make generalized predictions on a broad scale.
NOAA is now saying that the Atlantic Multi-Decadal Oscillation (AMO) has entered a "cold phase" and that it's quite possible that we will see multiple years of diminished Atlantic tropical cyclone activity. The last such phase lasted 23 years (from 1971 - 1994).
See, now you're switching parameters. First you were talking about US landfalls, and now you're talking about the Atlantic basin. Can't do that without including the Cat 5's that hit in 2007.
What they're saying is that overall numbers are down. One aspect of that is the lack of Cat3+ storms landfalling the US.
There is no importance to a largely arbitrary meteorological distinction except to try to win a political argument. If the maximum wind speed when the storm makes landfall is a few miles per hour below a threshold it's technically not a hurricane. That doesn't mean it's not a destructive storm that might do far more damage than a storm with slightly higher wind speeds.
As for this: "Further anecdotes, such as @brgRC90's breathless comments about the number of people killed by Sandy (zero, in the U.S.) are tangential" WTF?
"The death toll in the United States directly attributed to Sandy includes 48 in New York, 12 in New Jersey, 5 in Connecticut, 2 in Pennsylvania, and five in other states."
http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/13/world/americas/hurricane-sandy-fast-facts/index.html
Didn't you just contradict your own argument about Sandy?It makes a statement about the overall climatology.
AlGore (among others) promised us that global warming would lead to bigger, more powerful storms. The history of Atlantic basin hurricanes over the last decade has show this to not be the case. What it tells us is that there are greater dynamics at work than just average global temperature and that it's unrealistic to make generalized predictions on a broad scale.
NOAA is now saying that the Atlantic Multi-Decadal Oscillation (AMO) has entered a "cold phase" and that it's quite possible that we will see multiple years of diminished Atlantic tropical cyclone activity. The last such phase lasted 23 years (from 1971 - 1994).
Didn't you just contradict your own argument about Sandy?
Also, Wikipedia clearly refers to Sandy as a hurricane, even saying it is "unofficially known as 'Superstorm Sandy'".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Sandy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Atlantic_hurricane_records
------It wasn't considered a major hurricane. The damage that ensued was due to overdevelopment.
Heh, heh. He said tan genita... Oh. Crap. Never mind.Further anecdotes, such as brgRC90's breathless comments about the number of people killed by Sandy (zero, in the U.S.) are tangential.