If I'm a defensive recruit, I am knocking down the door of this camp with Ash and schiano. No brainer.
So Michigan camp with recent Mich DC hire from Boston College #1 Defense in the country won't have a pull?
If I'm a defensive recruit, I am knocking down the door of this camp with Ash and schiano. No brainer.
I don't have a problem teaming up with Meyer and Rhule. OSU will get the ones they want most of the time anyway, and Rhule brings a lot of buzz to the camp. If this serves to trivialize Harbaugh's trip to a single school, so be it. This is a win/win to me.
Harbaugh will grab a few that he wants anyway, we all know this; it is the mystique of Michigan. But, if we can keep some home, this is a very smart move. Except for the players that want to play for Michigan or Harbaugh, would you rather go to Paramus Catholic's camp, or the one that has multiple coaches and staffs present. End of the day, those in the first group? We weren't gonna convince them anyway.
"would you rather go to Paramus Catholic's camp, or the one that has multiple coaches and staffs present"
You realize the PC camp has 6 programs present while the Rutgers camp has 3 Right?
"would you rather go to Paramus Catholic's camp, or the one that has multiple coaches and staffs present"
You realize the PC camp has 6 programs present while the Rutgers camp has 3 Right?
No argument from me. I'm just going by what has been advertised by each camp.Not saying that this is a point that weighs in favor of either competing, but i'm not sure that the 6 vs. 3 number is correct/final either. For one thing, it is hard to imagine that FDU won't be present at the camp taking place at their own facilities.
So Michigan camp with recent Mich DC hire from Boston College #1 Defense in the country won't have a pull?
The only issue is had Ash taken the invite to be part of the PC/Mich camp the kids would be exposed to 8 programs instead of 3. By holding it on the same day the kids at the Rutgers camp get exposure to only 3 programs. Seems like a disservice to most of the student athlete's. OSU and Michigan are going to get their 4 and 5 stars no matter how these camps go. To me its more about the 2 and 3 stars getting to camp in front of multiple schools for $30 or $40 bucks.
Coaches will urge their kids to attend the camp with fewer coaches? Those are coaches that do not have the student athletes best interests in mind.
The only issue is had Ash taken the invite to be part of the PC/Mich camp the kids would be exposed to 8 programs instead of 3. By holding it on the same day the kids at the Rutgers camp get exposure to only 3 programs. Seems like a disservice to most of the student athlete's. OSU and Michigan are going to get their 4 and 5 stars no matter how these camps go. To me its more about the 2 and 3 stars getting to camp in front of multiple schools for $30 or $40 bucks.
Coaches will urge their kids to attend the camp with fewer coaches? Those are coaches that do not have the student athletes best interests in mind.
I understand your sympathy for those players but they have a choice to make. Wow that's life isn't it, what a great early learning experience. However, this move needed to be made, Ash couldn't play 2nd fiddle to michigan and that's exactly what it would have been at PC's camp. Their president chose who would get top billing when he invited jimmy boy to be the commencement speaker, then said O but you have to invite RU. Like we're poor little Oliver Twist asking for more.The only issue is had Ash taken the invite to be part of the PC/Mich camp the kids would be exposed to 8 programs instead of 3. By holding it on the same day the kids at the Rutgers camp get exposure to only 3 programs. Seems like a disservice to most of the student athlete's. OSU and Michigan are going to get their 4 and 5 stars no matter how these camps go. To me its more about the 2 and 3 stars getting to camp in front of multiple schools for $30 or $40 bucks.
Coaches will urge their kids to attend the camp with fewer coaches? Those are coaches that do not have the student athletes best interests in mind.
Of course the meechigan fan (thevictors) finds a problem with the OSU-Rutgers-Temple camp. But I wonder what Harbaugh is going to do about this. Who will be the surprise additions to his camp to grab the spotlight now? Predictions? His brother?I would be very surprised if several smaller schools don't en dup at the Rutgers OSU camp.. Some mid majors and d2.
You realize Syracuse and BC don't count, right?:stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:
Of course the meechigan fan (thevictors) finds a problem with the OSU-Rutgers-Temple camp. But I wonder what Harbaugh is going to do about this. Who will be the surprise additions to his camp to grab the spotlight now? Predictions? His brother?
With more schools showing, I would put the advantage to the Michigan camp anyways. If he brings along some NFL names, it is a no brainer. It actually was lame of Ash. Had he run it another day, kids could of attended both.
It doesn't matter, when push comes to shove, Harbaugh can run up the score, and everything works out. Ash isn't Meyer. He doesn't have the horses to be pushing an agenda vs Michigan. More so, knowing full well Jim isn't afraid to put his foot on the pedal, the last he should push for is a pissing contest. To each his own I suppose.
(but in this case, Michigan started it)
Another arrogant Michigan PUTZ. Ann Arbor is full of them.With more schools showing, I would put the advantage to the Michigan camp anyways. If he brings along some NFL names, it is a no brainer. It actually was lame of Ash. Had he run it another day, kids could of attended both.
It doesn't matter, when push comes to shove, Harbaugh can run up the score, and everything works out. Ash isn't Meyer. He doesn't have the horses to be pushing an agenda vs Michigan. More so, knowing full well Jim isn't afraid to put his foot on the pedal, the last he should push for is a pissing contest. To each his own I suppose.
Stick your tip up your arse. Michigan HS football sucks, that's why you guys need nearby Ohio and everywhere else.By recruiting in NJ? lol
Rutgers has landed 15 players in the top 15 from NJ going back to 2010 (7 recruiting classes). Michigan not counting 2016 had landed 3 top 15 from NJ in that time. So the fact that they landed 4 of your top 10 last year means they started something? Why don't you have a problem with every other team that has raided NJ for years and much more effectively than Michigan outside of one year?
Here's a tip:
Good teams recruit nationally (and internationally even). So you can have your recruiting classes be 80% NJ kids all you want but at the end of the day it won't help you beat schools that get kids from all over the country. Rutgers has 9 commits, 8 from NJ and 1 from NY. Michigan has 12; 4 from MI and then so far 1 from Colorado, New Mexico, Florida, New Jersey, Alabama, Massachusetts, Georgia, Connecticut, and Quebec.. "Fence the garden" all you want. It will get you middle of the pack status at best in the B1G. Also, thanks for the top NJ recruit in back to back years and 3 of the last 4 years.
Stick your tip up your arse. Michigan HS football sucks, that's why you guys need nearby Ohio and everywhere else.
Stick your tip up your arse. Michigan HS football sucks, that's why you guys need nearby Ohio and everywhere else.
Which only goes to show that Michigan doesn't have any good high school recruits (especially after MSU takes them all) and so you have to hit the road and find players elsewhere. Us, on the other hand have a ton of well coached strong and fast players. We never have to leave the state. And so here is a tip for you, improve your high school academic and athletic support systems and maybe you won't have to leave your state either.Here's a tip:
Good teams recruit nationally (and internationally even). So you can have your recruiting classes be 80% NJ kids all you want but at the end of the day it won't help you beat schools that get kids from all over the country. Rutgers has 9 commits, 8 from NJ and 1 from NY. Michigan has 12; 4 from MI and then so far 1 from Colorado, New Mexico, Florida, New Jersey, Alabama, Massachusetts, Georgia, Connecticut, and Quebec.. "Fence the garden" all you want. It will get you middle of the pack status at best in the B1G. Also, thanks for the top NJ recruit in back to back years and 3 of the last 4 years.
Which only goes to show that Michigan doesn't have any good high school recruits (especially after MSU takes them all) and so you have to hit the road and find players elsewhere. Us, on the other hand have a ton of well coached strong and fast players. We never have to leave the state. And so here is a tip for you, improve your high school academic and athletic support systems and maybe you won't have to leave your state either.
They must have better players since they beat you 7 of the last 8 times including last year with your little darling Jimmie. He's got to be a glutton for punishment, I hear he's traveling down to Australia to try to find another Butterfingers O'neill.So your assertion that MSU gets the better players is baseless no matter how far you go back give or take a couple years:
With more schools showing, I would put the advantage to the Michigan camp anyways. If he brings along some NFL names, it is a no brainer. It actually was lame of Ash. Had he run it another day, kids could of attended both.
It doesn't matter, when push comes to shove, Harbaugh can run up the score, and everything works out. Ash isn't Meyer. He doesn't have the horses to be pushing an agenda vs Michigan. More so, knowing full well Jim isn't afraid to put his foot on the pedal, the last he should push for is a pissing contest. To each his own I suppose.
They must have better players since they beat you 7 of the last 8 times including last year with your little darling Jimmie.
Read the post above you, friend. MI has better recruits than NJ.
Also of Michigan's top 5 players 2 have already commited to UM, another 2 are Michigan leans and the last is 50/50. (http://247sports.com/Season/2017-Fo...Rankings?InstitutionGroup=HighSchool&State=MI)
So your assertion that MSU gets the better players is baseless no matter how far you go back give or take a couple years:
http://247sports.com/Season/2016-Fo...Rankings?InstitutionGroup=HighSchool&State=MI
http://247sports.com/Season/2015-Fo...Rankings?InstitutionGroup=HighSchool&State=MI
http://247sports.com/Season/2014-Fo...Rankings?InstitutionGroup=HighSchool&State=MI
http://247sports.com/Season/2013-Fo...Rankings?InstitutionGroup=HighSchool&State=MI
http://247sports.com/Season/2012-Fo...Rankings?InstitutionGroup=HighSchool&State=MI
http://247sports.com/Season/2011-Fo...Rankings?InstitutionGroup=HighSchool&State=MI
MSU landed their best class ever last year and were only ranked 18th. They've NEVER out-recruited Michigan which doesn't mean anything of course cause we had great classes with Hoke and the team sucked. But you're arguing recruits and said MSU gets the best players which just isn't factual. To be fair I started lurking this board after the game last year and the hilarity and delusion has kept me coming back and I know most of you don't use facts in your arguments so it's okay.
1-1, yet outscored 73-42 and more to come.
Go away. Rutgers isn't a threat to... oh wait, Rutgers is something to you because you are here defending Crazy Harbaugh. No one has time to spend on UM board because it's an afterthought. Btw, the quality of recruits is what matters. Care to compare Michigan to NJ... I think not.:boxing:1. Make a false statement that MSU gets better recruits.
2. I show you this is incorrect and in the very same post say that recruiting doesn't really matter but you made it your argument which is the only reason I'm talking about it.
3. You reply telling me how recruiting doesn't matter cause MSU wins.
Please keep up, I already made your point before you. Any other baseless arguments or are we done here?
If he chooses to run up the score it is Rutgers job to stop him. But, if Harbaugh CHOOSES to try to humiliate kids who are playing hard, that speaks volumes about his character.
There is really no debating this, one upping Coach Ash at camps or recruiting is a part of his job. Running up the score only proves he is an assh***.
By recruiting in NJ? lol
Rutgers has landed 15 players in the top 15 from NJ going back to 2010 (7 recruiting classes). Michigan not counting 2016 had landed 3 top 15 from NJ in that time. So the fact that they landed 4 of your top 10 last year means they started something? Why don't you have a problem with every other team that has raided NJ for years and much more effectively than Michigan outside of one year?
Here's a tip:
Good teams recruit nationally (and internationally even). So you can have your recruiting classes be 80% NJ kids all you want but at the end of the day it won't help you beat schools that get kids from all over the country. Rutgers has 9 commits, 8 from NJ and 1 from NY. Michigan has 12; 4 from MI and then so far 1 from Colorado, New Mexico, Florida, New Jersey, Alabama, Massachusetts, Georgia, Connecticut, and Quebec.. "Fence the garden" all you want. It will get you middle of the pack status at best in the B1G. Also, thanks for the top NJ recruit in back to back years and 3 of the last 4 years.
Scroll up. Michigan has a 5 star, 8 four stars and 29 three stars, Rutgers has no 5 stars, 4 four stars and 29 threes.Go away. Rutgers isn't a threat to... oh wait, Rutgers is something to you because you are here defending Crazy Harbaugh. No one has time to spend on UM board because it's an afterthought. Btw, the quality of recruits is what matters. Care to compare Michigan to NJ... I think not.:boxing:
Any other baseless arguments or are we done here?
Yes, we are done here. I'm getting tired of F'ing with you. You're too easy to get riled up. I wouldn't want to make you break out the pie charts.
Seems like a disservice to most of the student athlete's.
Those are coaches that do not have the student athletes best interests in mind.
How many of all recruits end up making the NFL let alone high draft picks? It doesn't compare. Also it been documented the process of evaluating HS talent is bias against the northeast. Btw, does UM *ss still hurt from my cousin Zeke Elliott from running over under and through you....[cheers]Scroll up. Michigan has a 5 star, 8 four stars and 29 three stars, Rutgers has no 5 stars, 4 four stars and 29 threes.
Oh sorry, providing facts is frowned upon. Let's keep saying things as if they're true and then maybe they will be! You have information at your finger tips, use it.
See ya in the fall. Maybe you'll keep the game interesting this time.
Ran up the score? Michigan was up only 19 and scored with 11 minutes left in the 3rd and went for 2 to make it a 4 touchdown game. Sorry it hurt your feelings. They then went on to a run heavy offense and scored a whopping 6 points the rest of the game. Just because Rutgers sucks and got blown out doesn't mean the opponent runs up the score. Michigan could have EASILY scored 70 that game if they kept the starters out there and ran their normal offense. I was at that game and that defense was a sieve.
It's ridiculous posts like these that actually made me create an account. I can't believe people think like this. The game thread last year and the posts since make me laugh. Such delusion and self entitlement from a program that hasn't done shit in over 100 years of it's mediocre existence.