I came away thinking and saying the say thing to those I was with. He was all over the court on the defensive end and in transition on the fast break weaving through defenders and passing/finishing at the hoop or getting fouled. Unfortunately, in the second half he missed four consecutive foul shots (was probably a bit gassed), but then made two crucial ones down the stretch. I see a lot of Jacob Young with respect to his athleticism and ability to get to the rim, but more in control than Young even being his first game as a freshman. Of course it’s one exhibition game, but I think yesterday’s competition was high level.Saw a St Johns write up on Twitter saying JMike was our best player. And that Gavin looked good. Definitely encouraging for their first action against real competition
I see a lot of Jacob Young with respect to his athleticism and ability to get to the rim, but more in control than Young even being his first game as a freshman. Of course it’s one exhibition game, but I think yesterday’s competition was high level.
"Put up a shot early in the shot clock up 2 with 20 something seconds to play" - interested in who took it and what was left on the shot clock.They also inexplicably put up a shot pretty early in the shot clock up 2 with 20 something seconds left. Cliff pulled down the offensive rebound and got fouled, then went 1-2 from the line which left the door open for the tying three pointer. Could’ve killed some clock and gave it to St. John’s with very little time left, or waited to see if St. John’s tried to foul which would’ve probably put someone other than Cliff on the line.
Pike likes the kid, but he's not this level player. As far as being a good team guy, I'm sure the walk-ons are that too.You realize that this was a single exhibition game, right? Way too early to bury Oskar. He is one of our best 3pt shooters and is a good team guy.
Completely unfair and unnecessary. Oskar is a 10-11 guy at this level. He helped us when we needed him last year. And now you toss him under the bus for a preaseason game ? You are a bust as a “fan”Hope I’m wrong, but I think Oskar, sadly, is a bust, simply no excuse to have such a bad showing as a senior. Im glad his parents where here last year to see his best game. So, now we know.
Listen...last year was last year. He has been here long enough to show SOMETHING. Put your big boy underoos on. I think if you ask him, he was hoping to be more than a "10-11" guy. As did Pike, I bet.Completely unfair and unnecessary. Oskar is a 10-11 guy at this level. He helped us when we needed him last year. And now you toss him under the bus for a preaseason game ? You are a bust as a “fan”
Preseason hype that you are:Thx for asking - Could probably write 10K words. The game was a great experience for the team, high intensity against a talented team with a great coach in a classic venue.
First thing I noticed I haven't seen mentioned - they didn't solve the press because they brought in another ballhandler - that was incidental to why they solved it
Hyatt, then Osckar, then Wolf all failed as inbounders after made hoops (someone tell them they can run the baseline please) - they didn't see when our small guards were getting open and when they did pass it, they tended to throw a pass that pinned them on the sideline (Which was the defense's intention Pitino is a great coach). Most of the turnovers or issues vs the press were caused on the inbounds pass.
Our small guards also displayed zero technique in getting open and they didn't try anything team-oriented like setting picks to get open. When the secondary guy tried to get open, like Palm or Hyatt, it was even worse, they didn't even come close. I'll hold the editorializing on this other than to say it was disappointing in both the players and the coaches. The entire game changes if this is solved more quickly.
Could there have been a few early foul calls by the refs on the press that would have changed everything? Absolutely. Will we get those calls at SHU or Mich State? I doubt it.
We solved their press by having GG inbounds the ball. He found the guards as they got open and not on the sideline and they got the ball up the court. A couple of times when we had two small guards in, one of them inbounded it quickly to the other, this is a good fix.
Having GG inbounds the ball is a bad solution for the press, you want him sprinting up the court not inbounding the ball. High priority to get this fixed, I don't know how much B1G teams will press but I'd imagine SHU had someone at the game. Most high major college coaches just don't press.
Having 2-3 guys be possible inbounders (I'd say anyone but GG or Cliff) and doing it as quickly as possible is the optimal way to do this but most coaches don't trust 2-3 guys and specify ONE guy, which lets the press set up every time.
I did not understand why he was in instead of Hyatt at the end of OT1Whatever you think about Oskar it was weird that he started and then bizarre that he played so much in OT after not playing at all in second half
Exhibition gameWhatever you think about Oskar it was weird that he started and then bizarre that he played so much in OT after not playing at all in second half
so SJ guy hooks Simpson then gives him attitude like he did something wrong. Steps to Simpson and Cliff separates them pushing SJ jackhole and SJ team took exception. SJ guy with ball was the problem. He acted like Simpson did something wrong.. he did not.
Do you know who else didnt score for us?He’s not. That might be in practice, but it hasn’t materialized consistently. You realize he didn’t score right? Did you see his minutes? As an experienced player he should have made his mark. Apparently he started. He had a chance to show out a bit. He didn’t. Exhibition or National Championships, doesn’t matter. If you have game, at some point, you must show it.
We don’t want wolf at the four and we need Mag back to hit our potentialNeed one of Oskar or Chol to step up until Mag is a full go... sounds like we need Mag back in a big way. From what I've seen in posts it doesn't sound like either played well. We might see more Wolf at the 4 if neither can... or more small ball with Hyatt at the 4 with Noah Simpson and J Mike
A. Don’t think he attempted many, but on the one attempt I remember (a make), I thought he showed nice touch / more arcFor those who were there?
A) any improvement in Cliff’s baby hook
B) much question but that a healthy Mag is our #2 statistical rebounder
C) can Wolf provide good minutes at both 4 and 5
D) impression that anything from Ogbole, Oskar, Chol will be a bonus
E) Derek, J’Mike, and Noah competitive with one another, all capable at the 1
F) You think Gavin can get us 10-5-3 line
Open ended question….
Can noah,jamike, and simpson be on the court at the same time?
Until proven otherwise….i see
1-2 noah jamike derek
3 GG
4 mag (hyatt or chol or oskar)
5 cliff and woolfolk
ThanksA. Don’t think he attempted many, but on the one attempt I remember (a make), I thought he showed nice touch / more arc
B. Yes, I don’t think it’s much of a question. 4 spot is noticeably thin. Concerned that our need to crash the defensive boards by committee til Mag’s back will limit transition opportunities
C. Think he can be competent at the 4, but his game still seems best suited for the 5. Did attempt a three pointer and showed some ability handling the ball, so perhaps he can build on that
D. Ogbole’s still out, but on Chol / Oskar that would be my takeaway — think we’ll be forced to play at least one of them decent mins til Mag is 100% but wouldn’t have high expectations. Oskar is who he is at this point, will need the 3 to be falling to give us anything. On Chol, thought he physically looked the part but the game still appears a little fast for him — momentary lapses on both O and D
E. Yes, think all three can give good minutes at the 1. Would imagine we’ll take a PG by committee approach
F. Yes, apparent the offensive ability is there to do that
Exhibition game
How does that work defnesively.I also think we see GG at 2, Hyatt at 3 for significant minutes in games where matchups favor it. Highly dependent on Chol or Oskar or Wolf playing well enough at the 4 to bump Hyatt to the 3 for some minutes.
I think Pike loves and thrives with lineup/substitution flexibility and it's different this year with smaller guards but he will still maximize it.
It’s good and a bit bad. Davis looks like he is going to be very good for RU. Great get by Pike. Very athletic kid who can contribute on both sides of the court immediately. On the flip side, the other guards didn’t really step up enough. It’s only one game so no reason to be alarmed but Noah and Simpson NEED to be very good if this team is going to the tournament.Count me among those very much encouraged by what I'm reading here. I had no inclination of JD being a major contributor this year. That's really exciting that he performed like this!
There is no reason to play Gavin at the 2. It’s not going to help him if he’s chasing smaller guards around. Play him at the 3 which is a better match up for him on defense and offense. Davis and Simpson are going to play the 2 as much as possible. The only issue is this team has too many 3’s/wings. I think it’s going to be an issue but Pike will figure something out.How does that work defnesively.
These are all new players so i cant have too much conviction right now……with that being said i know what Hyatt is and i dont want him on the court as a 3. Id say your lineup.screams zone but i hate having Hyatt play zone.
I believe there were 2 instances when Noah / Davis and Simpson were on the court together yesterday. Also there were 2 instances when Cliff and Wollfolk played together.Open ended question….
Can noah,jamike, and simpson be on the court at the same time?
Until proven otherwise….i see
1-2 noah jamike derek
3 GG
4 mag (hyatt or chol or oskar)
5 cliff and woolfolk
A- I think Cliff hit a hook yesterdayFor those who were there?
A) any improvement in Cliff’s baby hook
B) much question but that a healthy Mag is our #2 statistical rebounder
C) can Wolf provide good minutes at both 4 and 5
D) impression that anything from Ogbole, Oskar, Chol will be a bonus
E) Derek, J’Mike, and Noah competitive with one another, all capable at the 1
F) You think Gavin can get us 10-5-3 line
Without getting into details …the long term (-!: mayve the shirt term plan ) is to play GG as a guardThere is no reason to play Gavin at the 2. It’s not going to help him if he’s chasing smaller guards around. Play him at the 3 which is a better match up for him on defense and offense. Davis and Simpson are going to play the 2 as much as possible. The only issue is this team has too many 3’s/wings. I think it’s going to be an issue but Pike will figure something out.
The trend seems to push that direction without looking at 350 roastersIs there a single team in high major hoops with nobody over 30 mins?
I think Hyatt is playing half to two thirds of his minutes at the three …How does that work defnesively.
These are all new players so i cant have too much conviction right now……with that being said i know what Hyatt is and i dont want him on the court as a 3. Id say your lineup.screams zone but i hate having Hyatt play zone.
Both Yeboah and Harper played the 4 thoughWithout getting into details …the long term (-!: mayve the shirt term plan ) is to play GG as a guard
If you want to call us a three guard line up…then call it that. But he is not A small forward line akeaski yeboah , or a combo forward like Ron Harper
.
You think Simpson is more of a PG than Davis?I think Hyatt is playing half to two thirds of his minutes at the three …
The waaaaay too early projection of minutes “per position “….is (when Mag is back )
Center
Cliff 30
Antoine 10
Power forward
Mawot 24
Aundre 16
Small forward
Aundre 8
Gavin 20
A Williams 12
Shooting guard
Derek 13
Jmike 20
Gavin 7
Point guard
Noah 27
Derek 13
Mpg …with no foul trouble …when mag is back
Cliff 30
Noah 27
Gavin 27
Derek 26
Mawot 24
Aundre 24
Jmike 20
A Williams 13
Antonio 10
This is what I think will happen ….and it’s 9 guys
I’m stock up on Jmike and stock down on A Williams right now …but that could change . They both aren’t going to light up from outside , but Jmike really looks like he is a plus athelte on both ends of the court …and can get all of the way to the rim. Gavin griffths says hello spotting up at the stripe to Jmike (and Derek ans noah)
The issues I have with this will we still need more rebounding with mag at the gettknf 25 mph???
Oskar and chol are not the answer there except for situation periods and I really don’t see wolf being the answer at the four …even Shaq Carter took nearly a year and a half to be able to get the defense into himself to allow him to play the four with Myles ….on defense . I see the same progression time needed with wolf
Of course …if wolf is on the floor mkre as a four (I’m not seeing it , but I’ll defer to pike who is there every day, duh) …someone else isn’t getting minutes in the zero sum game ….
The answer I come back to is will compensate sone by pressing and falling back into a zone more than we have in the past …or just go zone …maybe 12-14 minutes is the hypothesis ….
I’m not unconvinced that mag isn’t going to be more of an efficient offense player than we all expect when healthy …the question is when does that rust get worn off . When it does…I can see him and cliff , fouls willing , being on the court 30 minutes each ….
The real reason is you have the OVERThe reason to play Gavin at the 2 is you want to get a lineup like this on the court:
One Simpson/Noah/JMike
Gavin
One of Hyatt/Mag
One of Chol/Wolf/Oskar/Mag
One of Cliff/Wolf or small ball center
Lots of possibilities
Noah, Gavin, Hyatt, Mag, Cliff
JMike, Gavin, Mag, Chol, Wolf
You'd do this because you want more minutes for any of the guys listed above over Simpson/Noah/JMike, while keeping Gavin on the floor.
We had a 6'7" point guard last season and a 6'4" 2 guard last season and yet people think Gavin is too tall to play guard this season? It's weird. Gavin is quicker and more athletic than either of those two guards from last year.
GG minutes at the 2 take minutes away from Noah Simpson Davis since they are all small guards who can't play the 3 reallyThe reason to play Gavin at the 2 is you want to get a lineup like this on the court:
One Simpson/Noah/JMike
Gavin
One of Hyatt/Mag
One of Chol/Wolf/Oskar/Mag
One of Cliff/Wolf or small ball center
Lots of possibilities
Noah, Gavin, Hyatt, Mag, Cliff
JMike, Gavin, Mag, Chol, Wolf
You'd do this because you want more minutes for any of the guys listed above over Simpson/Noah/JMike, while keeping Gavin on the floor.
We had a 6'7" point guard last season and a 6'4" 2 guard last season and yet people think Gavin is too tall to play guard this season? It's weird. Gavin is quicker and more athletic than either of those two guards from last year.
Both Yeboah and Harper played the 4 though
You think Simpson is more of a PG than Davis?