Serious question. Did you watch the game?8-12Ws unless road jinx disappears.
Serious question. Did you watch the game?8-12Ws unless road jinx disappears.
A wiseman (maybe a bookie) once said: 1 game does not a season make. This was a game RU should have won and did. It's early and the real tests will start soon + the BIG schedule. The other troubling factor in the equation is road games. Does history repeat itself or does something new start this season? That's why my prognostication is that low. BTW RUs newcomers looked very good vs FDU. For RU to succeed this season they'll have to continue to play that well.Serious question. Did you watch the game?
A wiseman (maybe a bookie) once said: 1 game does not a season make. This was a game RU should have won and did. It's early and the real tests will start soon + the BIG schedule. The other troubling factor in the equation is road games. Does history repeat itself or does something new start this season? That's why my prognostication is that low. BTW RUs newcomers looked very good vs FDU. For RU to succeed this season they'll have to continue to play that well.
We make the same mistakes of assuming a team looks the same every year....Eugene will not play the same role that he filled in his 1st 2 seasons.
He will have a lot fewer chances offensively on the glass because i think we will shoot better. And i don't measure impact on PPG.
Eugene has evolved his game to a point where teams sagged off him....so he's worked on his perimeter game....if that part of his game is somewhat reliable...(25 3 pointers would be a goal), then he goes from 7 to 10 or 11 PPG.
I don't see the offense running plays for Eugene....this is a guard oriented team. If Eugene is the 2nd leading scorer and he's not knocking down shots, that means we are missing FTs, missing shots in the paint and Eugene is cleaning up those misses.
I also factor in Shaq Carter, Shaq Doorson and others being more capable of scoring inside without offensive rebounds....OR all 3 of these players should be able to have an impact.
I have Eugene (unless jumpers or perimeter game is there) as the 5th leading scorer. That's my best case scenario for others like Harper, Thiam, Mathis and Kiss all joining Baker as perimeter oriented.
I will need to see whether there's a situation where the staff draws up a play designed to get Eugene the ball. I see ball movement and shot distribution being much better and the roster evolving.
For RU to grow as a program, we have to look past what's being said and focus on what makes sense. Eugene is a captain, takes charges, rebounds, defends the teams bigs, wings and guards....he's an critical piece to the toughness on the roster.
But that doesn't mean his value only happens by scoring. And i am very interested in seeing how far along he is offensively and can he play outstanding defense and be a 28 to 30% shooter from 10 to 19 feet....
Is that a yes or no?A wiseman (maybe a bookie) once said: 1 game does not a season make. This was a game RU should have won and did. It's early and the real tests will start soon + the BIG schedule. The other troubling factor in the equation is road games. Does history repeat itself or does something new start this season? That's why my prognostication is that low. BTW RUs newcomers looked very good vs FDU. For RU to succeed this season they'll have to continue to play that well.
I believe the turning point is 45 to 50 games together, when you have this many new faces. A lot of unknowns that appear to be in a positive direction.
It is mid January 2020 when this roster (minus Shaq Doorson) essentially figures out what strengths and weaknesses are there.....and what weaknesses get solved by being exposed during the B1G schedule this year.
The entire key IMO lies with how much rope does the staff play with this season to extend it's bench and play through mistakes. If we extend minutes in games 1 through 8 to Caleb McConnell, Montez Mathis and Ron Harper, that tells me we want depth created for the B1G season and we are thinking long term.
We only have the confidence in Geo Baker now, because he was force fed minutes very early last year...but he hit a wall of teams adjusting and the flu took his legs away.....but finished up with a flurry at MSG that built confidence in the player.
Eliminating lost minutes later and making them quality minutes only happens if Mathis, McConnell and Harper play a LOT more minutes in the 1st 10 games...that may mean some closer games than expected and tough learning curves vs MAC contender Eastern Michigan and BE foes SJU and SHU.
If the youth plays well early in spots (like Baker did last year) and we can get Kiss and Eugene to be consistent grinders vs asking them to be scorers, then the upside goes way up. My ideal scenario isn't asking Eugene to give us 8 PPG and 7RPG in 26 minutes....its 6PPG and 6RPG, while McConnell Harper and Mathis learn on the job.
If Pike decides that shaving his rotation down to 9 players by mid January is preferred, that means some development may have to wait for players 10 and 11 and some other players have exceeded expectations to form a true rotation.
If we are consistently playing all 11 players most nights (dependent on matchups), then we may still be progressing but still not sure where players stand in February. That could be considered good news or could be not so good news.
I like the roster a lot and have confidence in how the staff will bring these players along. I'm truly not worried about the win loss record since 2019 recruiting is practically done and we've moved on to working on 2020....so a 12-18 season isn't going to derail anything other than a few fans.
The best case scenario is we get production and roles established very early and we get to see the team improve as the schedule gets tougher....a Baker path of development for Mathis, McConnell and Harper is more important to me for this year vs won-loss record.
I predicted 15 wins before the season started and after two games that feels like an expected minimum to me now.
As Hillary said to the Committees investigating the aftermath of the Bengazi debacle - "What difference does it make?" BTW, I base my opinions on my experience as a player and coach on several different levels.Is that a yes or no?
Lol are you kidding? If you actually were a player and coach you would know there is a huge difference between box score watching and actually seeing a team play. Come on now. Secondly, don't bring politics to the bball boardAs Hillary said to the Committees investigating the aftermath of the Bengazi debacle - "What difference does it make?" BTW, I base my opinions on my experience as a player and coach on several different levels.
Hawk, wondering if these two games have changed your opinion on Eugene. 6 and 6?
Sure, but then that would negate the nature of “predictions”.lets get through st johns game
it would be a miracle, but possibleOver .500. No way we are under.
Unfortunately, despite my excitement for the upcoming season, I too think that we're probably going to win 12 or 13 games (7-3 OOC, plus 5 or 6 B1G wins), with an outside chance at 14-15 wins.
Of course, if Baker, Omoruyi, Thiam, and Kiss exceed even the most hearty of expectations, all bets are off, and perhaps we push for an NIT bid. But that scenario is an outlier.
If forced to pick, I'd say 13-17 (7-3, 6-14).
Im gonna say 3-17 in conference play and we finish 10-21 after getting bounced first round of big ten tourneyI can't believe I never posted my season prediction thread here but I would have them 7-5 at this point...loss at Miami, win at Fordham. I thought 5-15 in league for 12-18 overall with 1-1 split in Big 10 tourney for 13-19...might be good to revisit league schedule again
Yeah, this would be my best case scenario. Hard to imagine we go winless in conference. Worst case scenario 8-22.Im gonna say 3-17 in conference play and we finish 10-21 after getting bounced first round of big ten tourney
Unfortunately, despite my excitement for the upcoming season, I too think that we're probably going to win 12 or 13 games (7-3 OOC, plus 5 or 6 B1G wins), with an outside chance at 14-15 wins.
Of course, if Baker, Omoruyi, Thiam, and Kiss exceed even the most hearty of expectations, all bets are off, and perhaps we push for an NIT bid. But that scenario is an outlier.
If forced to pick, I'd say 13-17 (7-3, 6-14).
If we aren't young this year I am VERY VERY VERY worried for our future. If McConnell, Harper, Mathis and Johnson aren't combined getting a decent amount of minutes our program is in trouble.
I wrote this in another thread, but it's equally applicable to this one:
My hope is that we ride an inside-out game of Baker and Omoruyi, with Thiam and Kiss sprinkled in as third and fourth offensive options.
I'd like to see Baker at 14 ppg and Eugene at 12 ppg, basically replacing what we lost from Sanders and Freeman. Then Kiss has to step up and at least replace Mike Williams' 8 ppg, and Thiam has to increase his own production from 7 ppg to 10 ppg.
That's 44 points from your top four scorers, and I have to think we'll be able to add another 22 ppg from the rest of the roster (Doucoure, Doorson, Carter, Johnson, Mathis, McConnell, Harper). That would be 66 ppg overall, which is, I think, six points better than last season.
But it all starts with Geo and Gene.
Asking Baker to play out of position as PG where he will be responsible for the offense to flow AND asking him to score 14 PPG is way too much!
Unless there is massive improvement scoring is not what Eugene brings to the table. Asking 12 PPG is a bit much
The thing is, Geo and Gene will be our two primary offensive options, with Kiss and Thiam mixed in as well. When the game is on the line, I want -- and I would guess most people would want -- Geo taking the shots. I don't see where adding 3.2 ppg is too overwhelming for him.
I see your point more with asking Gene to go from 8 ppg to 12 ppg, but again, he was a bench player last year and will be a 30-mpg guy this year, and our most accomplished front-court scoring option, so it's not out of the realm of possibility -- though I admit it will require him to actually hit 15-foot jumpers with some regularity.
This is probably two games better than I should be predicting as the schedule with 23 of 30 games coming against the power 6 leagues ...
Thinking that we just find a way...and that we will be a pretty tough out
We got to survive the first 1/3 of the big ten schedule which is brutal ...can’t start 0-6....got to find a way to steal one or two of those ...
We also really need to take care of business and go 7-0 against the “easier out of confrence games”....last year’s 15-19 could have been 17-17 if we didn’t blow home games against Hartford and stony brook
And we really need geo to stay healthy ...he is the one guy we cannot afford to get hurt
All in all....think we squeak out 15-15 heading to Chicago for the big ten tournament
I have updated my base case to 11 wins (which includes a win in 10/14 B1G game again)
BEAR CASE (35%) 9 wins.....Newcomers, as a whole, not ready to make an impact on Day1. Which means 25+ minutes for Issa and seeing 2 bigs on the floor almost exclusively. We have major trouble scoring and it bleeds to the defensive end. 1 injury to a core player makes depth even a bigger issue and guys not ready are being forced in to too many minutes
BASE CASE (50%) 11.....2 out of (Kiss, Mathis, McConnell and Harper) are or very close to being "B1G" players from the start. We look a lot better offensively, but take a step back defensively. We see a lot of lineups with 1 traditional big man. We finish ranked in the 90 area in KenPom and lose a decent amount of games we are in for 35-37 minutes. There are major signs the program has turned the corner
BULL CASE 15% 14-15 wins.....We take major strides forward as the ball movement is very good. Chemistry is great and there is harmony between the newcomers and upperclassmen. Issa thrives and is a major factor on offense. 3 out of 4 of the newcomers are 25+ MPG players by choice. Our 3 attempts increase a ton and we shot an average amount of them and we hit 37% as a team. We take a small step back defensively. Carter and/or Myles Johnson outperform expectations (at least mine).
Hawk, you do know that Eugene average 8 and 5 last year in 21 mpg, right? So why in the world would the team be okay with his production going DOWN, despite playing more minutes? I don't follow the logic here.
If anything, with Eugene being the unequivocal leader of this team, and being one of the best returning players, don't we have to rely on him to be the first or second leading scorer on the team? Most good teams have a 1-2 punch (if not 3 and 4, LOL), and I'm expecting Eugene and Baker to form our 1-2 punch, with Eugene getting at least 11-12 points and 7 rebounds per game, while averaging 28 mpg.
Hawk, quit while you're behind on this one. EO has a better chance of averaging 12 than 6. I really can't see any scenario he only gets 6. Revisit this thread after the year
Updated Probabilities as of 11/12 (2-0 start)
Total Record:
7-23 = 0.1%
8-22 = 0.3%
9-21 = 1.3%
10-20 = 3.5%
11-19 = 7.3%
12-18 = 12.0%
13-17 = 16.2%
14-16 = 17.7%
15-15 = 16.0%
16-14 = 11.9%
17-13 = 7.4%
18-12 = 3.8%
19-11 = 1.6%
20-10 = 0.6%
21-9 = 0.2%
Conference Record:
1-19 = 0.2%
2-18 = 1.0%
3-17 = 3.6%
4-16 = 8.5%
5-15 = 14.6%
6-14 = 19.1%
7-13 = 19.4%
8-12 = 15.5%
9-11 = 9.9%
10-10 = 5.1%
11-9 = 2.1%
12-8 = 0.7%
13-7 = 0.2%
---------------------------------
Nightmare Result: 10-20 (3-17)
Horrible Result: 11-19 (4-16)
Below Average Result: 13-17 (5-15)
Base Case: 14-16 (7-13)
Above Average Result: 16-14 (8-12)
Great Result: 17-13 (9-11)
Dream Result: 19-11 (11-9)
Thought it would be interesting to revisit the season prediction thread, and some of the things said here.
Okay, I missed this by one win. On Thiam and Kiss, I think it's safe to say EVERYBODY overestimated their expected contributions. But they were supplanted by the freshmen, and I think everyone underestimated THEIR contributions (with the possible exception of Mathis - he probably "met" expectations.
Safe to say the Freshmen Four were a smashing success this year, and that our future is in very good hands.
Hit the mark on Geo and Gene. See my above comments on Thiam and Kiss.
I think the season played out as I suspected in terms of Geo and Gene being the leaders and go-to guys. Gene would have done even better if not for his injury, which really limited his mobility the last half of the B1G schedule.
Almost, Shack. Missed 15-15 by one miracle 3-pt bank shot by Iowa. Sigh.
This was a good take, FIG. And we hit the bull case!
6 and 6 for Eugene. Oy. (Sorry, Hawk, had to bring this up again - that was a really bad take on what Gene would bring this year).