Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're insufferable. Still no idea why Vedral didn't start, but he easily could've done what Artur did tonight and Langan has been doing this all year and likely would've had the same role tonight if Vedral started.Those who know, know.
I'll accept your apologies anytime trolls 😊
Go RU!!!!!!!!
does it hurt your back kissing your own ass as often as you seem to? That’s gotta be painful.
No one owes you shit sunshine! Get over yourself!
You sound miserable. We just WON. Be happy!You're insufferable. Still no idea why Vedral didn't start, but he easily could've done what Artur did tonight and Langan has been doing this all year and likely would've had the same role tonight if Vedral started.
he is hurtYou're insufferable. Still no idea why Vedral didn't start, but he easily could've done what Artur did tonight and Langan has been doing this all year and likely would've had the same role tonight if Vedral started.
Guy is special. If folks prefer Art then that's fine and fair. But either guy gives us a much better chance to win than Vedral. This was obvious since week 2.Think we can all agree; Langan in short yardage is a freaking horse. His legs never stop moving.
I trust Langan in short yardage situations more than any of our running backs.. seems to always get positive yardageThink we can all agree; Langan in short yardage is a freaking horse. His legs never stop moving.
Not sure the option is going to work all game. It worked because it's something they haven't seen before and were depleted on the D side. Gleeson saw that and exposed it. Like we all said he's a nice wrinkle and has a good package but full game starter, no, you still give the nod to Vedral.Those who know, know.
I'll accept your apologies anytime trolls 😊.
Go RU!!!!!!!!
TYou're insufferable. Still no idea why Vedral didn't start, but he easily could've done what Artur did tonight and Langan has been doing this all year and likely would've had the same role tonight if Vedral started.
VNot sure the option is going to work all game. It worked because it's something they haven't seen before and were depleted on the D side. Gleeson saw that and exposed it. Like we all said he's a nice wrinkle and has a good package but full game starter, no, you still give the nod to Vedral.
Think we can all agree; Langan in short yardage is a freaking horse. His legs never stop moving.
Vedral was injured during practice during the week and staff told Art to be ready and it was a game time decision to go with Art.You're insufferable. Still no idea why Vedral didn't start, but he easily could've done what Artur did tonight and Langan has been doing this all year and likely would've had the same role tonight if Vedral started.
I wasn't supposed to do that? Anyone have hammer they can lend me?That's like saying my screw driver is better than my hammer so I should throw the hammer out.
You were so very wrong and now you won't man up.You're feeding the troll.
What are you 12-years old?You were so very wrong and now you won't man up.
Just call em' how I see em'. I know you're mad I was right. All good!
Thanks, hadn't heard...Vedral was injured during practice during the week and staff told Art to be ready and it was a game time decision to go with Art.
Maybe and maybe not . Decent stats 18-24 / 141 yards / 2 TD’s no Int... Admit it you just hate the kid even if he has improved and he has .... If Langan was better ( and I love the kid) he would have been the starter ...You're insufferable. Still no idea why Vedral didn't start, but he easily could've done what Artur did tonight and Langan has been doing this all year and likely would've had the same role tonight if Vedral started.
Huh? I said nothing bad about Artur today either in my post above or in the game thread - was pretty happy to see him play a very good 1Q, but he struggled after that and could've easily had 2-3 picks. I don't think it's a stretch to say, however, that Vedral could've done better than AS today, based on him throwing for the most yards in years for RU last week and that Langan likely plays the same role today no matter who starts. I don't hate any RU player, although I have been tough on him, based on his pretty miserable record in his first two years.Maybe and maybe not . Decent stats 18-24 / 141 yards / 2 TD’s no Int... Admit it you just hate the kid even if he has improved and he has .... If Langan was better ( and I love the kid) he would have been the starter ...
You’re a tard! It is Gleesons genius in identifying the best skills each of the qb’s possess. Vedral is semi duel threat. Sitkowski is a drop back passer. Langan is a running QB with the size and will to bull through the line. Gleeson has identified the talents of each QB and has used them very effectively and efficiently!Those who know, know.
I'll accept your apologies anytime trolls 😊.
Go RU!!!!!!!!
Lol! Unreal. Vedral was 1-4 and led the Big Ten in int's. He was holding the team back big time. Enter Johnny and Art! Love my haters changing their arguments each week with me! I tried to tell ya and all my trolls for weeks! Those who know, know.You’re a tard! It is Gleesons genius in identifying the best skills each of the qb’s possess. Vedral is semi duel threat. Sitkowski is a drop back passer. Langan is a running QB with the size and will to bull through the line. Gleeson has identified the talents of each QB and has used them very effectively and efficiently!
You as right as Donald Trump is, still claiming victory. 🙄Just call em' how I see em'. I know you're mad I was right. All good!
Well Blue Bus, you're welcome to search my dozens and dozens of posts calling for Johnny over Vedral and saying Vedral has been holding us back because we are a decent team NOW. They start on Oct. 31. Enjoy!You as right as Donald Trump is, still claiming victory. 🙄