ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Winter Storm Thursday 2/20: Very Likely Somewhere Between A Non-Event and a Minor Event (oof)

Not sure there's any better encapsulation of how this winter has gone for most of us in this area than the GFS graphic of snowfall for the next 16 days. It's not that we've been shut out, it's that everywhere else around us, even areas that usually get much less, have gotten more and are projected to get even more. Ouch for snow lovers, lol.

sn10_acc-imp.us_ma.png
  • Haha
Reactions: bac2therac

Sources: SEC, Big Ten building momentum to further expand College Football Playoff to 14 or 16 teams

16 and no BYES is the way they need to go... however they will choose 14 with BYES and some convoluted system. My guess is SEC and ESPN really wants the same 12-team system but more ability for SEC to get teams in. Justification to leave out others.. like drop the conference champion thing in favor of the rankings that they have more influence over.

I said it when the BigXII, Pac 12 and Big Ten talked about having their own championship because the SEC was being recalcitrant in negotiating a playoff expansion.. F'orget the SEC and ESPN if SEC insists on BYEs.

But I also suggest having early season OOC games scheduled by some independent mediator-type organization to establish some kind of basis of comparison between conferences. Schools scheduling their own opponents doesn't produce a lot of interesting or unique early season matchups. Perhapos it should be like basketball where you have all these early season tourneys.. but a football version of that.

GAME 26 OREGON: Death Spiral

I think the general consensus that I see across the Twitterverse and TV is confusion, as opposed to laughter.

And before the season started we were closer to a bubble team than a sweet 16 team, so it’s actually not that crazy what’s happened considering a lot of the injuries and sickness we’ve been dealt. And I’m in no way making excuses for this team or Pikiell for the season we’ve had, but it has been a factor in us at least not being closer to a bubble team.

Our football program has been ridiculed and mocked much, much worse than this basketball team ever will be.

This season will be over in about a month and nobody will care anymore (with the exception of the die hard Rutgers fans).
IDK. I think potential transfers and HS recruits who have other options will care and that's what matters most.
  • Like
Reactions: darkcheck

GAME 26 OREGON: Death Spiral

I think Lathan is very good, especially for a Frosh.
He is one of a few worth holding onto but not sure he should be eating up a large portion of our salary cap as one poster intimated. He needs to reshape his body and build more muscle to be effective in the post on both ends of the floor. I don't think he is mobile enough to be play the four unless we want to play zone exclusively on defense. I also have not seen evidence that he can be an effective player on the perimeter.

GAME 26 OREGON: Death Spiral

Yes, all the doom and gloom is well founded, however OP mention of "where the game announcers called out the Rutgers focus, seriousness and effort" is off-base. Yes, the announcers did indicate that but perhaps what is needed is to search for possible explanations for what we saw.

Have we seen games where this team lost but fought hard to the end? yes. So what is the difference between then and now?

Yes, I think seeing the NCAA dream dashed can be brutal but specifically to this game there is a larger problem that does not come down to heart or coaching, in-general. I see the problem as something strategic and technical.

I think Pike's D is based on player length and cutting off passing angles and being patient on D. And it is based on players being able to D up on multiple positions. I compare how Cliff played the 5 in this D vs anyone we have now.

Cliff, and Myles before him, would jump out on screens and make the guards adjust and then, quickly, would dive the lane to get back to rim protection and the defender he switched with wouldn't be on his man very long.

That doesn't happen now. Somerville and Dortch do not hedge hard and do not switch back. Nor do guards like Williams, stuck on a big man, look to switch back. Ogbole, for all his limitations, was better at this. Who's fault is this? Is it coaching? Is it the inexperience of the players or not playing together in this system long? I have no idea. But if you look for it, it is easy to see... win or lose.

Furthermore, Oregon's hot 3-point shooting required coming out of the Pike D. In the past, with experienced players in this D, the "envelope" of the D was large.. it could extend to the three-point line and beyond at times. These guys are not there. So, even executing the Pike D, they are more vulnerable to three-point shooting.

How officials call the game: Very few calls this game. Oregon was hands-on on D, grabbing, pushing, and shoving.. Rutgers played hands-off, as usual.. don't check the players.. check the passing lanes. Pushing Rutgers around, if you get away with it, is a sure way to beat us.

So, the doom and gloom is justified. These explanations are not excuses. But it does not mean these players have no heart or have given up. We have some weaknesses that can be exploited and we have had to witness that.

For the players' sake I hope they make the Big Ten tourney where they can show us their heart. But they won't make it there if they do not show us their heart over these last 5 games.

OT: Winter Storm Thursday 2/20: Very Likely Somewhere Between A Non-Event and a Minor Event (oof)

Summary: Little to no snow likely for most, except maybe a minor event for SENJ; could still be a minor event for everyone if the track of the coastal trends back NW and/or if the upper level low overperforms (still 2.5 days out, so some changes are still possible).

Details: So the 6Z models this morning continue with the trend SE with no models currently showing more than 1" for anyone in the Philly-NJ-NYC region, except for the 6Z NAM, which caved SE, but does still show 1-2" for extreme SENJ. However we're still 2.5 days away from the event start (late Weds night) and the players won't all be over land and well-sampled until this afternoon, so there could still be some decent shifts in the model guidance once that occurs, possibly putting our area back into at least minor (1-2") snowfall range, i.e., it's prudent to wait until after tonight's 0Z models to declare the patient completely dead. The NWS/WPC haven't completely thrown in the towel yet, still predicting (through Thursday at 7 am; they also note that a bit more snow could fall through early Thursday afternoon) up to 1" south of 78 and for NENJ/NYC/LI and predicting a minor 1-2" event for Salem to Toms River and SE of that line, but that was before seeing the 6Z models, so they may adjust towards a non-event still.

The NWS is still calling for a minor snowfall south of about 78, as per their 4 am discussion below, but they do note the trends towards a non-event. One other reason to hold off on cancelling this one completely is that Walt Drag, the retired NWS (Boston and Philly) meteorologist, is still calling for 2-6" from NW (Sussex/Poconos) to SE (Jersey coast), despite the models mostly showing nada. He feels the developing strong upper level low dropping down from the Great Lakes through PA/NJ will still produce at least some high ratio powdery snow (from 0.1-0.4" of precip), even if the primary southern coastal low goes too far to our SE to produce snow for anywhere but SENJ and he also thinks snowfall near the NJ coast could be enhanced by an inverted trough from the well offshore low back to the upper level low (which is why he thinks the coast could get the highest amounts).

He recognizes he's largely alone on this, but is sticking with his pattern recognition skills. It's worth noting that he never bought into the major/historic snowfall model runs shown by most of the models 4.5-6 days out (only calling for 2-6" for our area, even if he acknowledged there was potential for more), as he always thought there was a risk that the upper level low and the coastal low wouldn't phase on time for a major coastal storm for our area, which he was right about. It's impressive enough that he never bought in to the big snows, but it would be extraordinarily impressive should we still get minor/moderate snowfall from the ULL (perhaps enhanced by an inverted trough from the coastal low well offshore back to the ULL). A link to his latest post is below.

https://www.americanwx.com/bb/topic...9-12z-fri-221/?do=findComment&comment=7660113

One other comment. In hindsight, it looks like the Euro-AI model has scored a major modeling coup, as it never showed a major snowstorm for our area, unlike every other global model all of which showed at least a few runs with major snowfall. The Euro-AI had most runs in days 4-7 showing a minor to moderate hit (and one run on Sat 12Z with significant snowfall, but not major), which I posted about in the pattern thread before this thread (link to post below). Out of the rest of the models, the GFS was close to the Euro-AI, only showing one major snowfall run, also on 12Z Sat. The Euro, UK and CMC all had multiple major snowfall runs for our region in that timeframe (including some historic runs). Unfortunately, I started this thread after the 12Z Sat runs, which were the snowiest for the entire storm evolution, lol. Bad timing.

https://rutgers.forums.rivals.com/t...ikely-for-most-of-january.287192/post-7137388

https://www.weather.gov/phi

Area Forecast Discussion
National Weather Service Mount Holly NJ
646 AM EST Mon Feb 17 2025

SHORT TERM /TUESDAY NIGHT THROUGH WEDNESDAY NIGHT/...
By Wednesday afternoon high pressure will start to depart as an
upper level low develops south of the Great Lakes. This will result
in an increase in cloud cover over the region ahead of a low
pressure system that starts to initiate well to our south.
Trends in the EC ensemble Low tracks and GEFS low tracks continue to
show the most likely scenario with the low is that is develops well
to the south and doesn`t strengthen until the low is well offshore.
The 00z EC substantially jumped south but the EC ensemble system was
fairly consistent with a slight southern shift relative the to 18z
suite. Given that consistency in a more southern track, the forecast
has been shifted further south with the snow totals highest
over southern Delaware. Based on the 17/00z suite of guidance,

snow is still forecast to move over portions of central and
southern Jersey however if the 00z EC pans out, we may see a

mostly dry event.


NWS snowfall forecast thru 7 am Thursday (note that they're predicting some more light snow thru 1 pm Thursday)
3qwDLSI.png

The 6Z NAM and the 03Z SREFs (where the SREF is often overdone) are the only models showing any snow over 1" anywhere north of coastal DE, although several models have ~1/2" amounts throughout the inland regions north of there due to the upper level low approaching from the NW (not from the coastal storm missing us way to the SE), while several others show nada. I can understand why the NWS cut snowfall back again.

We're close to miracle territory for getting even minor snowfall north of DE, although the NWS 1 in 10 chance (not quite Dumb and Dumber miracle levels, lol) high end map does show some surprisingly high snowfall amounts for the area, with several inches for SNJ and even 1-2" for 95, indicating that there's still some potential for more snow (and reflecting that we're still ~48 hours away from the "event" starting time)...but their 1 in 10 chance low end map shows 0.0" for everyone. And Walt Drag still thinks we could see an inch or so of powder along 95 on Thursday and a little more towards the coast, so I'd still say we're between zero and minor snow for most.

TqF6Gfq.png
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT