Originally posted by Upstream:
This is a prime reason why Athletics needs to be self-sufficient (taking nothing beyond student fees from the University). Otherwise, no matter how small the subsidy, there will be those who will point to the money spent on athletics as better spent elsewhere.
I get that the faculty union wants to get more money for professors. And I get that even if the money spent on athletics were spread out, and everyone got a $500 raise, it wouldn't make or break them, but they'd still take the extra $500.
However, it is not like Rutgers professors are poorly compensated. Despite the claim by Chris Filter that his salary is comparable to a high school teacher's salary, the average salary for a professor at Rutgers-Camden is in the 97-99th percentile for similar institutions. For Newark, the average professor salary is in the 90-97th percentile. And while New Brunswick lags somewhat, average salaries are still way above the median of similar institutions at the 69-85th percentile
Camden avg professor salary:
http://chronicle.com/article/2013-14-AAUP-Faculty-Salary/145679?cid=megamenu#id=186371
Newark avg professor salary:
http://chronicle.com/article/2013-14-AAUP-Faculty-Salary/145679?cid=megamenu#id=186399
New Brunswick avg professor salary:
http://chronicle.com/article/aaup-survey-data-2013/138309#id=186380