ADVERTISEMENT

Fran Brown vs Greg Long Term

and if he loses to UCONN we will hear the he's learning excuse
Since mentioning Mora, he would have been a good choice for Syracuse.
Not making any predictions how this will work out for Syracuse. One never knows.

Their schedule in ACC:
BC
Cal- That will be a loss-Cal is solid.
NC State
PItt
Ga Tech
Miami
Stanford
Va Tech

Wild guess. Worst case, 3-9.
Best case 6-6
Probably 5-7
 
Nobody is "ragging" on him.
person spends many posts bagging on Schiano, and comes to the defense of Fran when no defense is needed.

Think most people are in a wait and see mode. Interesting hire- will be solid recruiting, but how will the rest of the coaching and game planning be? That's an unknown. If he surrounds himself with experienced coordinators and coaches, it may work out for him. Or it may not. He seems like a good guy who came up from humble beginnings. Easy guy to root for. Just can't root for his team. Not going to cast stones at every little misstep. Best case is he does well for a year or two and moves on to somewhere else and leaves Cuse for dead.
 
Gentle reminder - Greg is 9-27 in the B1G since returning (.250) but the Jury is out on Fran because hes never been a head coach and hired a DC who "made his bones recruiting".
Gentle reminder SUFan8827- RU's program was decimated by years of ineptitude and poor recruiting, particularly on the lines. Each year in the last 4 years had 4 near guaranteed losses. So that's 0-16 right there. take those away, and he's 9-11. How's that for some fun math and perspective.

The ACC. Bwa ha ha ha ha. 4 non-conference games, none against P5 opponents. A cushy ACC schedule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kbllmy21 and TRU2RU
person spends many posts bagging on Schiano, and comes to the defense of Fran when no defense is needed.

Think most people are in a wait and see mode. Interesting hire- will be solid recruiting, but how will the rest of the coaching and game planning be? That's an unknown. If he surrounds himself with experienced coordinators and coaches, it may work out for him. Or it may not. He seems like a good guy who came up from humble beginnings. Easy guy to root for. Just can't root for his team. Not going to cast stones at every little misstep. Best case is he does well for a year or two and moves on to somewhere else and leaves Cuse for dead.
I don't bag on Greg, I just am not a cultist and want to win. As for defending Fran, he did a lot to help this program recover from Ash, I know he isn't Greg, but still, nice if he could get a break on this site.
 
I don't bag on Greg, I just am not a cultist and want to win. As for defending Fran, he did a lot to help this program recover from Ash, I know he isn't Greg, but still, nice if he could get a break on this site.
But nobody is bagging on Fran either.
Do you think these are fair questions:
1. What are the chances of a coach succeeding as a head coach at the P5 level when he has never even been a coordinator?

2. Are those chances of success helped when you hire as your DC a guy who has not been a DC at the P5 or a lower level?

Can't think of an example of where #1 has happened, so IMO, its a very fair question.

Now, the wild card is if he kills it in recruiting, and that may well happen. But there is more to winning than recruiting. The hill in the ACC is not as steep as it was in the B1G East (thankfully the divisions are gone in the B1G). Any comparisons are quite meaningless, but for those that like to either cast stones or question the current head coach, they will do it anyway.

BTW, I am far from a cultist. I have several issues I have noted in multiple other threads.
 
Gentle reminder - Greg is 9-27 in the B1G since returning (.250) but the Jury is out on Fran because hes never been a head coach and hired a DC who "made his bones recruiting".
he is 0-16 vs OSU/PSU/Mich/Wisc/Iowa
Teams that almost never lose to anyone but themselves.
So- taking over the Ash mess- he is 9-11 against the rest of the B1G outside the top 5.
 
Went through all this with Hafley
The "boss recruiter" rearranging the universe template is overrated.
Now with NIL, players can just up and go any ole way.
Football teams are big with all kinds of characters.
Good football coaches have fathering type vibe.
Just being "a chill dude" doesnt go far.
Flood tried that and crime wave ensued
 
Gentle reminder - Greg is 9-27 in the B1G since returning (.250) but the Jury is out on Fran because hes never been a head coach and hired a DC who "made his bones recruiting".
WTF does that have to do with anything Mrs Ash? Your husband left a giant mess that he is cleaning up year by year. Most sane fans consider us on the right track. Solid foundation as evidenced by the # of highly skilled players coming back for another year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRU2RU
But nobody is bagging on Fran either.
Do you think these are fair questions:
1. What are the chances of a coach succeeding as a head coach at the P5 level when he has never even been a coordinator?

2. Are those chances of success helped when you hire as your DC a guy who has not been a DC at the P5 or a lower level?

Can't think of an example of where #1 has happened, so IMO, its a very fair question.

Now, the wild card is if he kills it in recruiting, and that may well happen. But there is more to winning than recruiting. The hill in the ACC is not as steep as it was in the B1G East (thankfully the divisions are gone in the B1G). Any comparisons are quite meaningless, but for those that like to either cast stones or question the current head coach, they will do it anyway.

BTW, I am far from a cultist. I have several issues I have noted in multiple other threads.
That is the Rhule, Penn State, Temple, and Baylor connection. That is very tight group they like to surround themselves with familiar faces. It is not surprising, will it work, I don't know, but nothing really has worked at Syracuse for a while, it is a very tough place to win. If he pulls it off he is going to be a very hot prospect for one of the top tier jobs, if he fails, he goes back to being a top recruiting guru.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift
But nobody is bagging on Fran either.
Do you think these are fair questions:
1. What are the chances of a coach succeeding as a head coach at the P5 level when he has never even been a coordinator?

2. Are those chances of success helped when you hire as your DC a guy who has not been a DC at the P5 or a lower level?

Can't think of an example of where #1 has happened, so IMO, its a very fair question.

Now, the wild card is if he kills it in recruiting, and that may well happen. But there is more to winning than recruiting. The hill in the ACC is not as steep as it was in the B1G East (thankfully the divisions are gone in the B1G). Any comparisons are quite meaningless, but for those that like to either cast stones or question the current head coach, they will do it anyway.

BTW, I am far from a cultist. I have several issues I have noted in multiple other threads.
Those saying we are bashing Fran- we arent...Fran has proven to be an outstanding recruiter. When here- we recognized that but also had some concerns about his actual coaching. He made a great move to Georgia and who could blame him. And it led to a HC position.
Now- for the few that are worried about his recruiting and how it may impact us- it may have some impact early but less later unless he is also a great mentor to other recruiters on staff.
As HC- you win and have a reputation. As a recruiter- you are the closer, not the relationship guy. HC, outside of his reputation and wins- is no longer the recruiter.
He will be successful based on his ability to be a CEO and bring in top Coordinators as well as recruiters equal to him
 
Gentle reminder - Greg is 9-27 in the B1G since returning (.250) but the Jury is out on Fran because hes never been a head coach and hired a DC who "made his bones recruiting".
YES - 100% "the jury is out." How can it NOT be otherwise?
 
think this is a foolish post

We don't anything about how Fran will do as a HC, which is very very different than being a position coach. The enormity of responsibility and attention to detail, hiring, selection, etc etc etc is all new to him.

no way to tell how he will do, just foolish post
 
  • Like
Reactions: newell138
That is the Rhule, Penn State, Temple, and Baylor connection. That is very tight group they like to surround themselves with familiar faces. It is not surprising, will it work, I don't know, but nothing really has worked at Syracuse for a while, it is a very tough place to win. If he pulls it off he is going to be a very hot prospect for one of the top tier jobs, if he fails, he goes back to being a top recruiting guru.
It's a no lose opportunity for Fran. Hope it works out for him, and he is gone to some other team that is not Syracuse in 2 years.
 
It's a no lose opportunity for Fran. Hope it works out for him, and he is gone to some other team that is not Syracuse in 2 years.
I agree, I hate the idea of Syracuse winning at anything, but I take solace in that it will only be for 2/3 years and if he is a success he will be gone. I can even see him ending up in the pros. He is young, just 40, that is the prime age for moving up the coaching ladder.
 
Fran Brown will be lucky to last as long as the previous guy, Dino Babers, 8 years. I predict Schiano will be kicked out 3-4 years if he doesn't get the passing offense in the right direction. Fran might last 5-6 years. Nobody going to consistently recruit highly rated recruits to Syracuse and everything depends on his OC hire which is probably more important than the head coach. They are getting a guy from the Giants who coaches running backs, not a OC. He was co-offensive coordinator at Baylor, probably a learning experience.
 
Last edited:
I think Brown is a decent hire for Syracuse.

However, Brown has been thought of as one of the best recruiters for a while now. The fact that better schools have not jumped at the chance to get him as a full DC or HC, and he has to take a pretty bad job at Syracuse, tells you a lot about how his ability as an actual coach is perceived.
Yes, never have gotten the DC job is telling. SImilar to when Kurt Floods was left by Schiano to destroy Rutgers after he left.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newell138
WTF does that have to do with anything Mrs Ash? Your husband left a giant mess that he is cleaning up year by year. Most sane fans consider us on the right track. Solid foundation as evidenced by the # of highly skilled players coming back for another year.
Nice insult. Yes plz forgive me for having expectations of not losing by 25 pts to Maryland
 
Gentle reminder SUFan8827- RU's program was decimated by years of ineptitude and poor recruiting, particularly on the lines. Each year in the last 4 years had 4 near guaranteed losses. So that's 0-16 right there. take those away, and he's 9-11. How's that for some fun math and perspective.

The ACC. Bwa ha ha ha ha. 4 non-conference games, none against P5 opponents. A cushy ACC schedule.
If "Fun" math is excluding 16 games and still being 2 games under .500 I think we have different definitions of fun.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RUTGERS95
If "Fun" math is excluding 16 games and still being 2 games under .500 I think we have different definitions of fun.
that was match point and well played

was a stupid stupid attempt on his part to adjust the win/loss


that said, this whole thread is full on retarded. way way too early to see how Fran is going to do and Fran doesn't have Manny, Moe, and Jack to overcome each year.
 
Yes, never have gotten the DC job is telling. SImilar to when Kurt Floods was left by Schiano to destroy Rutgers after he left.
You do realize Greg recommended Flood and Flood was the HC here when Greg got blackballed on NFL assistants and had to raid our coaches- he was not "left" here.
 
I don't particularly like the category of hiring recruiter like Shane Beamer (USCe) and Joey McGuire (TT) vs coach/developer but I wouldn't take he could "only" get Syracuse to hire him as a negative.

Lance Leipold could "only" get Kansas to give him a chance and he's done wonders there. Same for Kleiman at KSU. There are others. Cignetti this year at IU, we'll see how he does. ADs don't look off the beaten path much and it takes guys like Leipold or Klieman or DeBoer to do well to finally open their minds as to what could potentially work.

We'll see what he does now that he has the opportunity.
I am not sure what point you are trying to make here.

My argument is that no one else even giving Brown a chance as coordinator, let alone head coach, is telling.

You listed a bunch of guys who have mostly followed the assistant-coordinator -lower level HC path so I don’t see how they are relevant.
 
Gentle reminder SUFan8827- RU's program was decimated by years of ineptitude and poor recruiting, particularly on the lines. Each year in the last 4 years had 4 near guaranteed losses. So that's 0-16 right there. take those away, and he's 9-11. How's that for some fun math and perspective.

The ACC. Bwa ha ha ha ha. 4 non-conference games, none against P5 opponents. A cushy ACC schedule.

he is 0-16 vs OSU/PSU/Mich/Wisc/Iowa
Teams that almost never lose to anyone but themselves.
So- taking over the Ash mess- he is 9-11 against the rest of the B1G outside the top 5.
I didn't see your post when I posted mine- what do they say about great minds- even had the same two West Powers. lol
Loved the name change too
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Knight Shift
The ability of anyone to recruit at Syracuse is way overrated. They have almost nothing to offer, including NIL.
Also see the other post on the new FBS subdivision. Syracuse, and many other ACC schools, don't meet the proposed financial requirement to play with the big boys.
Fran's recruiting ability depends on whether he decides to be head coach or head recruiter. Can't do both. Plus, his recruiting personality may get him into living rooms, but he has nothing to offer to close the deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU89
I can confidently predict, with absolute certainty, that Brown will either succeed wildly, or fail miserably, or else he will land somewhere between those two extremes.

Everyone seems to want to argue in this thread. So go ahead, prove me wrong. 🤨
 
Their 2024 opening schedule is a juggernaut.

Ohio Bobcats
Army
Holy Cross
UConn
With that schedule Fran might have a Jim Mora type first year and not crash and burn like someone did in the Rockies after being touted as the COY by the Buff Boys before the horse shit they were selling became buffalo chips
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift
I can confidently predict, with absolute certainty, that Brown will either succeed wildly, or fail miserably, or else he will land somewhere between those two extremes.

Everyone seems to want to argue in this thread. So go ahead, prove me wrong. 🤨
but I heard someone say that Mrs.Brown has a lovely daughter
 
I am not sure what point you are trying to make here.

My argument is that no one else even giving Brown a chance as coordinator, let alone head coach, is telling.

You listed a bunch of guys who have mostly followed the assistant-coordinator -lower level HC path so I don’t see how they are relevant.
You said the fact that better schools haven't jumped on him as full DC or HC and that he had to settle for a lower status school like Syracuse says a lot about how his coaching ability is perceived.


I'm saying even if that is the perception it doesn't mean it's reality. It might be or might not be reality.

Regardless of whether it's DC or HC or whatever having no alternatives besides a lower status school isn't something you can read into about his ability. I think most likely it won't work out (that's not saying much because more often than not hires generally don't) but I can't say that's because no one higher up gave him a shot. Like I said ADs don't go off the beaten path much, that's why only a Kansas would give a Leipold a shot or KSU for Klieman. Better schools didn't jump on them either. Only when they did well there did suddenly other schools take notice and think about them as candidates. Also suddenly then a name like Cignetti at JMU or Chesney at HC seems more plausible as candidates because of what Leipold, Klieman, DeBoer have accomplished.

As for coordinators we see how much coaches more often than not stick in their cocoon of guys they've worked with so if Brown doesn't have a good enough network he might not get that shot. Look at Buh here, he's been lousy everywhere as DC but still got a shot as DC here because he knew Ash and that kind of thing isn't an exception.

Lack of opportunity doesn't necessarily say anything about acumen, it may or may not. We don't know. Lack of opportunity just means lack of opportunity sometimes or not getting that lucky break.

He's got his opportunity now, so we'll find out. Same for Robinson. Notice now that his buddy (just like other HCs) got a HC spot he's got an opportunity as DC. With him too, he's got his shot now so we'll find out.
 
Fair but I believe Fran was also a lead recruiter on that staff
Hafley was once our lead recruiter and one of the best. Now he's head coach and doesn't have time to know every recruits best friend, girlfriend, where he likes to eat, what movies he watches or how his vacation went. The same will happen to Fran. That's how these guys worked, they knew every aspect of a recruit's life and became their best friend. That job now falls to his assistants and will determine his fate.
 
Getting a few recruits equal winning football games. Why would anyone compare Brown to Schiano at this point? Will there even be a ACC in a couple of years?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT