Stats can be misleading.DePaul got offensive rebounds that resulted in put back baskets or additional offensive possessions which resulted in Rutgers fouling.Don’t let facts get in the way of emotional posters.
Stats can be misleading.DePaul got offensive rebounds that resulted in put back baskets or additional offensive possessions which resulted in Rutgers fouling.Don’t let facts get in the way of emotional posters.
sh!t I thought 2 other guys were mostly to blame. You are missing something important on the 3 to make DePaul up 61-58.Okay, went back to the last 6 minutes of the game. Biggest offender, imo, was Hyatt.
54-50: Freeman-Liberty pushes off Baker to get open under the basket, and Harper fouls trying to help. F-L hits the layup and his FT. Announcers were blaming Harper here, but it was Baker's man and he was pushed out of the way for F-L to get open.
54-53: After a Mulcahy missed 3 (looked to be a good look to me), Hyatt called for foul for holding Johnson's arm. Looks like Johnson may have initiated this with a cagey move, but still a foul Hyatt could have avoided. Johnson hit both FTs
54-55: Harper makes 2 FTs after getting an elbow from Johnson
56-55: Harper misses a 3 after bobbling the ball, but Omoruyi cleans it up with a putback.
58-55: Mulcahy can't get around a clearly moving screen, as defender stepped into him as he was pursuing his man, leads to an open 3.
58-58: Baker drives and misses a layup. Hyatt doubles the driving player, leaving his man open on the perimeter, ball is kicked out for 3 and he can't recover.
58-61: Hyatt hits great 3 in rhythm
61-61: Freeman-Liberty hits a three from 6+ feet outside the arc over Baker, who was defending with his heels on the arc
61-64: Hyatt misses a somewhat rushed 3. On the other end, Hyatt loses Jones and gets caught chasing, and Jones hits a 3.
61-67: Baker hits a 3 in rhythm
64-67: Mulcahy helps down to double, gets a hand on the ball to knock it loose, but DePaul recovers and kicks, Mulcahy fouls trying to recover to his man. DePaul makes 1/2 FTs
64-68: Harper big 3
67-68: Hyatt gets lost on a screen and Mulcahy couldn't switch in time, leading to an open 3
67-71: Harper big 3
70-71: Fouled intentionally, but DePaul hit both.
70-73: Baker missed final shot.
Defensive lapses by Hyatt led to 11 of DePaul's last 23 points.
sh!t I thought 2 other guys were mostly to blame. You are missing something important on the 3 to make DePaul up 61-58
??Stats can be misleading.DePaul got offensive rebounds that resulted in put back baskets or additional offensive possessions which resulted in Rutgers fouling.
Other than that Mrs. Lincoln how was the play? LOL.Yes we've had bad stretches before but this year is different. We have now played 4 games against inferior teams and I have not noticed any clear talent differential between our team and the competition. We have been behind in every single half and the amount of time that we've actually led in all 4 games can't be very much. What's the most we've led any team? Maybe 10-11 points? There doesn't appear to be one area of play that we excel in. We don't shoot very well, our ball movement is poor and no flow on offense, our defense has been awful at times , we're slow and not very athletic , and our rebounding is suspect.. ..I don't understand the lineups. Geo should be the lead guard , not Paul . Hyatt should start at the 4 , and Jones at the other guard position. Paul and Caleb should come off the bench. Caleb needs to sub for Ron ---he is just not a guard and has no outside shot. Bottom line is that Pike's lack of recruiting is really hurting this team. Can you imagine how bad this team would be if Geo and Ron had not returned?
??
That's what offensive rebounding is.. we were better at it than DePaul was in that game. Now if you want to argue we should've been even more better than have at it but we were not outrebounded.
Is there a stat on points off offensive rebounds? I know we had a few ORBs that ended up going nowhere. It may be that we got more offensive boards, but they got more points off of offensive boards. Would need to know the data on that, but it might be what is giving the impression that they were "better" on the offensive glass.
looked to me like he just moped for a second cause he didn't get the call. maybe I'm wrong but that's why I record the games.Baker drives in for the layup and misses, he looks up to see who got the rebound and once he sees it's DePaul's ball, he starts back on defense - he maybe was slow on his first couple steps, but he was behind the play already at that point. There's really nothing Baker could have done differently to impact that play since he was the farthest person from our basket when the break started.
Men's Basketball vs DePaul on 11/18/2021 - Box Score - Rutgers University Athletics
The official box score of Men's Basketball vs DePaul on 11/18/2021scarletknights.com
Second chance points 14-14.
To be honest I also felt like we were getting beat on the boards when I was actually watching so not sure what it is.Thanks! So that's not it.
looked to me like he just moped for a second cause he didn't get the call. maybe I'm wrong but that's why I record the games.
Regardless...could he have stopped the shot? Maybe not. Could he have busted his A$$ from the moment he missed to get back and set the example? Yes.
This seems to be.. not true?Depaul didnt have 2 of their starters last night too haha
Thanks. What I recall.Okay, watched it again.
Baker was out of bounds when the rebound came down, and was two steps behind everyone else when the break started. He definitely wasn't accelerating to top speed right away, and gave a couple jog-steps as the break started before getting up to speed. He was probably the last person to cross the midline.
He COULD have caught up to Jones on the arc if he'd gone flat out immediately and might have been able to flash cross the front of him as he was shooting.
So, I'll give him partial fault for that one.
On the other side of the court, Mulcahy also collapsed to the paint with his man split out wide to the arc, but Omoruyi was also between the two of them so that passing lane was closed off.
Well Stubblefield doesn't appear to have played a minute this year. Maybe he was a starter last year IDK.Unless rothstein is lying
Lol I'm an idiot Stubblefield is the coach.. Jalen Terry also doesn't appear to have played a minute this year.Well Stubblefield doesn't appear to have played a minute this year. Maybe he was a starter last year IDK.
I also don't know whether Grant-Foster started the first game against Coppin St. or whether his only playing 15 minutes was due to injury. What I do know is that he was some transfer from Kansas who played 9 mpg as a junior and took 8 DNPs.
Not yet, we aren’t there yet. Might not even be this season, might be next season.Bump baby bump
Are you certain? You are being too kind to our captainBaker drives in for the layup and misses, he looks up to see who got the rebound and once he sees it's DePaul's ball, he starts back on defense - he maybe was slow on his first couple steps, but he was behind the play already at that point. There's really nothing Baker could have done differently to impact that play since he was the farthest person from our basket when the break started.
The only players involved in the play when a shot went off were Harper and Hyatt for Rutgers, and Freeman-Liberty and Jones on DePaul.
Freeman-Liberty does a good job attacking the basket, and Harper is back to defend - but Hyatt also stays low to double team him, and Jones splits out wide to the arc. F-L stops in the paint instead of forcing a layup, and kicks out to Jones. Hyatt is 15 feet from him and tries to run out, but can't get there.
The only thing obvious is that nothing is obvious.Not yet, we aren’t there yet. Might not even be this season, might be next season.
It’s pretty obvious where this thing is headed.
Cliff and Agee = 0 defensive reboundsTo be honest I also felt like we were getting beat on the boards when I was actually watching so not sure what it is.
No no, it’s pretty damn obvious Pike has no clue what’s going on on offense.The only thing obvious is that nothing is obvious.
You're not allowed to call yourself an idiot. Only other posters are allowed to do that. (but that was good for a chuckle. I know the feeling)Lol I'm an idiot Stubblefield is the coach.. Jalen Terry also doesn't appear to have played a minute this year.
please note he took another look after I posted and came around on that play a bit.Are you certain? You are being too kind to our captain
If he didn't sprint back on D and picked up a man that play still happens?
It makes feel better that on one of the plays you say Mulcahy gets hit with an illegal screen. Watching on TV in live time I only see Paul being late and not getting through a screen. Tough to fight through the moving ones
I guess I am a fool.No no, it’s pretty damn obvious Pike has no clue what’s going on on offense.
It actually reminds me of Ash when he would only play man to man on defense and watch his players get lit up over and over and over again.
On the offensively side of the ball, our coaches are not putting our players in the best position to succeed. That’s an issue.
Anyone who doesn’t see this is a fool IMO
We lose geo and probably Harper next year . Maybe some others too. Not sure how this team is better under that scenarioI am well aware as of late November how bad his recruits have been. Definitely a real possibility Pikes batting average is bad for a few years.
The good news is we have a template and there is a portal. I am very optimistic about next year. We will have strong leadership and will use the portal to fill holes.
I had always thought this was a rebuilding year. I did expect the newcomers to be better, but I still think next year will be fine.
I don't want you to do this......I also swear much earlier in the game when Baker had the ball stolen had he sprinted to the spot he could have prevented a layup or god forbid even taken a charge. If he hustled and taken the angle he had a chance.Okay, watched it again.
Baker was out of bounds when the rebound came down, and was two steps behind everyone else when the break started. He definitely wasn't accelerating to top speed right away, and gave a couple jog-steps as the break started before getting up to speed. He was probably the last person to cross the midline.
He COULD have caught up to Jones on the arc if he'd gone flat out immediately and might have been able to flash cross the front of him as he was shooting.
So, I'll give him partial fault for that one.
On the other side of the court, Mulcahy also collapsed to the paint with his man split out wide to the arc, but Omoruyi was also between the two of them so that passing lane was closed off.
I predict you’ll wake up by the end of the year.I guess I am a fool.
Did we have too many possessions where we didn't get in to our sets quick enough or at all? YES
Is he sacrificing offense so we put out a better defensive lineup? YES
Is he trying to teach young people that defense is our calling card? YES
Does he place too much trust in some and not enough in others? PROBABLY
We run offensive sets.
Pike calls offensive plays.
I have a perfect view with over half of our games of what the staff is doing and how Pike communicates with our guards. We have an offense. It works. We don't always execute. Us not always getting in to our offensive sets is not a Rutgers problem. It happens everywhere at all different levels.
Ok then you can just stop right at that statement cause no appearance in an NCAA tournament during Baker and harpers senior season would be nothing short of a MASSIVE failure. We have senior leadership with NCAA experience. No. Just no.Define "everything is fine"? I don't believe this is a tournament quality team. It could be, but it's not the base case. I knew that before the season because there was absolutely no reason for the absurdly high expectations.
Lots of people seem to simultaneously think that Baker sucks and also that we will drop 150 spots when he leaves. This is not rational.
I knew that the baseline expectation should not be that this is a tourney team. I did not, and still do not, actually know whether we will make the tourney.How did you know we weren't a tourney team before the season? That is ludicrous.
I don't want to go there, at least not right now.We lose geo and probably Harper next year . Maybe some others too. Not sure how this team is better under that scenario
That should 100% be the baseline when your team wins a game in the tournament the year before and you return not one but TWO of your best players. I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about but that's a pathetic outlook.I knew that the baseline expectation should not be that this is a tourney team. I did not, and still do not, actually know whether we will make the tourney.
I agree. I did see some signs of hope from a few of the lineups. With Cliff, Hyatt, Geo, Ron on the floor we have a solid core. Even PM with those other 4 is OK if he plays his role. They actually ran an offense and moved the ball at the end of the game in stretches. They just need to get more time together. Add in McConnell and Jones as first two off the bench, and there is reason to hope. But we are definitely behind where we should be in terms of developing our core players as a rotation together, in the roles they need to be in, due to Pike's insistence on pushing PM into the role of initiating the offense and having McConnel anything other than an elite garbage man and glue guy.This was an absolute hideous loss. I am not even going to do a full recap given how infuriated I am right now. Make no mistake about it. De Paul is terrible. They got hot shooting 3s but so what, it never should have been this close of a game
Pike has been given god like status above criticism because he got us from hell to the NCAA tourney but quite frankly his coaching and development of the team this season has been beyond atrocious. This loss is on him and the staff. From his insistence on playing Caleb, to his mind numbing subsitution pattern, from pulling the guys who got us on a run, to not having his team full of experienced players even have a clue on how to run an end game situation with 25 seconds, to taking the ball out of Rons hands on the last couple of possessions
I really dont have many illusions about this season, we arent very good. We just lost to the worst team in the Big East. I dont care what other Big 10 schools are doing, they are losing to better schools. Yet the game was more than winnable even playing as bad as we did. Thats why this is on Coach. He is not putting this team in the best position to win. Its almost as if he and his coaching staff are resting on their laurels and this team is following suit, not working hard, no hunger. Its disappointing to see all around from players and coaches but we saw hints of this last year in games vs Nebraska for example.
We can go through each individual play but we know the game was lost early on and by midway through the 2nd the dye was cast. Stubborn coach going to bring a loss. I saw very little change from the first 3 games, more of the same. So now we have a small 4 game sample of this team against poor competition and we see in all 4 games almost the same exact level of play, mistakes, wrong lineups, lack of intensity, carelessness, lack of leadership. This team is in dire need of a major shakeup yet there is very little on the bench to bring in because recruiting has so many misses...Palmquist, Reiber, Agee, Mag. These are not Big 10 players. We have one kid on the bench that can shoot like crazy but Pike will not let him play through his mistakes..so down in flames we go. Hyatt shows more upside than anyone on the team yet continues to sit for long parts of the game. If you think recruiting isnt an issue, you are just a shill for Pike. Its a problem and next year its going to get real bad if we cannot hit the portal.
So many landmines ahead that can torpedo the season right away starting with dangerous Lafayette, a good Clemson and then big dogs in the Big 10. Last game I said we would get a better read on the team after this game, well we got the returns and its not pretty
I am wide awake. If Pike is part of any problem it is a small amount.I predict you’ll wake up by the end of the year.
There is no offense. It’s dribble dribble dribble dribble dribble.
And if you’re saying the players aren’t getting into it, then Pike should do his damn job and sit players down until their realize it’s not about them.
There’s a reason the team scores more when things are loose and they’re just running around making plays on the go. Pikes “offense” is to take the air out of the ball and it makes the team suck.
There have been 4 periods over the past 2 years (2 in each year) where the team has been in a funk and most think the sky is falling. The team never runs an offense and the players don't care and the coach is playing the wrong people.
Are you certain? You are being too kind to our captain
If he didn't sprint back on D and picked up a man that play still happens?
It makes feel better that on one of the plays you say Mulcahy gets hit with an illegal screen. Watching on TV in live time I only see Paul being late and not getting through a screen. Tough to fight through the moving ones
I am not asking you to do this, but if you read all my posts about this team starting preseason you will get what i think the issues are. After losing to DePaul I am not going to rehash my views to a board partially melting down.And you don’t think any of this is an issue? Good lord.
To the naked live eye I counted 3 defensive lapses by Paul. You have now taken away 1 and blamed a 2nd on a moving screen. Makes me feel better about Paul, but now concerned about another.....I went back and reviewed - if he went into an immediate flat out sprint to Jones, he could have jumped across his field of vision as the shot went up, which would have reduced its likelihood of going in, but he wouldn't have been able to prevent the shot. Hyatt staying more home on his man would have forced F-L to put up a contested layup against Harper or to take the ball back out to set up the offense.
As for the illegal screen.... Mulcahy was coming around the defender, who took a full step forward into him and made contact before setting his feet. He was still a step slow getting around the screen anyway, but could have contested the shot much better if the screener hadn't stepped forward into him.
There was a lot of movement on screens both ways in the game, though, without any calls that I remember - just wasn't something the refs were emphasizing last night.
Probably the biggest surprise for me was the shot that made it 71-67. Seeing it live really made me think Mulcahy lost his man and was out of position. Running it back, the shooter started near the basket with Hyatt guarding him, then ran along the baseline and curled up to the corner. Hyatt got caught up in the screen and left a wide open shot, and Mulcahy saw this and tried to switch off his man to close out on the shooter.