Since it appears to the OP that Iowa is the model offensive program RU should look like, here's just some of their B1G games on points allowed.
103 at Michigan (Loss by 12)
89 vs PSU at Palestra (Loss by 3)
76 at Nebraska (Loss by 6)
83 at home vs Michigan (Win by 7)
80 at home vs Rutgers (Win by 5)
82 at Maryland (Loss by 10)
104 at Purdue (Loss by 36 )
89 at Indiana (Loss by 12)
I think Iowa is a NCAA lock as a tournament team, But they still have remaining road games at Minnesota, at Michigan State and at Illinois. The only road win for them in conference is at Northwestern mixed with the opportunity blown by losing at Nebraska.
I just think we are talking about high floor, low ceiling, it's a program that fans here love because they have shooters in Iowa....and fans complaining about RU not having shooters is fine....but having shooters with no ability or interest in defense, is low ceiling.
The "model program to some fans" has 6 B1G road losses by a total of 79 points....while that may be OK, if you have 3 more road games left and you are Iowa and your average margin of defeat on the road is around 13 points, how exactly do you plan to make up that type of deficit??
Counter that with RUs B1G road record of total margin of defeat 12,3,5,5,6 & 6......that's 37 points in 7 games, which is much more ideal or realistic.....and if I eliminated the MSU game from 2 months ago....its just 25 points over 6 games....basically all around 4 PPG per game/road defeat....not an impossible gap to close, it's one stop on defense and another shot made on offense.
Defense travels and allows you as a program to stay in road games. It is virtually impossible to expect the opposite result, if the focus is only about running an offense..... to outshoot teams on the road and allow 80,85,90 and over 100+ points twice......?? No chance IMO to be successful....can you be entertaining??? Yes....
Winning consistently or being competitive on the road playing all offense and matador defense.....???....No shot....