The one difference between now and 2013 is - in 2013, there was the legit option of keeping Flood. The year was bad - but it was year two after we had won our first conference co-championship the year before and we still made a bowl (with a high profile opponent to boot).The other thing that is clear is that not many candidates are going to please everyone. Maybe Herman or Fuente? You wonder how many opinions there are amongst those writing checks. I guess it depends how many significant donors are involved.
This year I think they are probably going to fire Flood regardless of what the donors are willing to give for the new coach. Then if you are a donor, do you really hold out money because you didnt get your choice, and therefore ensure that RU gets a worse coach?
We arent getting Herman. Its not that we couldnt afford him in a vacuum. Its that hes highly coveted and there are better jobs out there - even if the money were equal or even if RU paid a little more.