Maybe it is the camera angle but I watched it three times and I still haven't seen a face slap. That was the "unnecessary roughness" call, right?
That's because he wasn't called for a face slap. He was called for contacting Fix in what they are calling the "triangle" part of the face. Basically you can't touch anywhere below the forehead. It's been a point of emphasis all year. You get anywhere near the eyes and refs have been super quick to call the violation.Maybe it is the camera angle but I watched it three times and I still haven't seen a face slap. That was the "unnecessary roughness" call, right?
Excuse me?
That's because he wasn't called for a face slap. He was called for contacting Fix in what they are calling the "triangle" part of the face. Basically you can't touch anywhere below the forehead. It's been a point of emphasis all year. You get anywhere near the eyes and refs have been super quick to call the violation.
Phewwww. I was truly confused lol.I tried to fix my quote. That wasn’t intended for you!
Edit: fixed it ;)
The death stare??!!Let’s face it, it was a make a call for waving off the locked hands
Against Suriano. The Ref was looking at Pat Smith the entire match. He was intimidated.
Happy Hour was calling! (just kidding, Abro...I love ya buddy).Abro, John Smith...Lol, you keep calling him Pat.
Happy Hour was calling! (just kidding, Abro...I love ya buddy).
The sad part is that idiot ref did not even know that penalty ended the match. He was going to have them keep wrestle
It was interesting to see Glasgow vs. a ranked 157 pounder. Big things to come. $$$$
The posts in this thread are useless to someone not at the match. Can someone explain Bad News Bears, ridiculous, Smith Going CRazy, etc. and post an update?
Just imagine if Glasgow was healthy - The kid beats the Oklahoma wrestler along with the Rider kid.I still think he should have not been out there today.I do not see anyone else wrestling this soon after surgery.It just does not make any sense to me.The talent is absolutely there and I only hope it pays dividends at the Big Ten tournament if he is healthy.Maybe he gets in with a couple of good wins.
The Ref was blind just like Fix for a second or two
That said I don't like this being a point, they need to change the rules to issue warnings first, and it really sucks when it decides a match.
Bottom line: Point of emphasis or not, calling that penalty point is a judgment call, and you don't make that call in the regular season, in SV, against the home team, in front of a sold out basketball arena. It was a terrible call, and was terrible for the sport. This is not the NCAA tournament. Let two warriors finish on the mat, the way I am sure they both wanted to.
So, you would rather that a call like this determine a national champion? On Saturday night in March, this same match is taking place, and you want Nick to lose on a hands to the face call? Really?Bottom line: Point of emphasis or not, calling that penalty point is a judgment call, and you don't make that call in the regular season, in SV, against the home team, in front of a sold out basketball arena. It was a terrible call, and was terrible for the sport. This is not the NCAA tournament. Let two warriors finish on the mat, the way I am sure they both wanted to.
A lot of people have mentioned this, but you have to keep in mind there is constant movement, level changes, half shots....etc throughout every match. Generally speaking, if this were a legitimate defense, the violation would never be called because every coach would just argue the opposing wrestler's movement caused the foul.What this doesn’t show is the STEP FORWARD Fix took immediately prior landing his face into Nick’s hand. Clearly, BOTH wrestlers looked surprised by the call, that tells you all you need to know. Absolutely terrible officiating.
Yet, the ref calls “unnecessary roughness” on Nick but let’s Willie Scott’s arm almost come out of his socket before making that “potentially dangerous” call where someone can actually get hurt, smfh. Yeah, that ref sucked.
Go RU!
Diane
So, you would rather that a call like this determine a national champion? On Saturday night in March, this same match is taking place, and you want Nick to lose on a hands to the face call? Really?
I think you want this call in a huge in-season match like this to bring it to the NCAA's attention, so that they can see how stupid it is, and so that they can make an adjustment now, rather than have a national championship match decided like this.
A lot of people have mentioned this, but you have to keep in mind there is constant movement, level changes, half shots....etc throughout every match. Generally speaking, if this were a legitimate defense, the violation would never be called because every coach would just argue the opposing wrestler's movement caused the foul.
It's useful to think of this along the lines of the penalty NFL defensive players get when they hit the head/neck area of an opposing offensive player. No matter what type of movement the offensive player does (i.e., lowering their head to brace for impact), its incumbant on the defensive player to avoid the head/neck area, no matter what.
Having said that, the officiating in this match was a total cluster fluffle. No doubt about that.
Intent or flagrancy doesnt factor into the enforcement of this particular rule. As to Correnti, I'm not sure. Must have missed that. However, I did see a blatant eye poke in Joey McKenna's (Ohio St. vs. Michigan St.) match today that went completely uncalled. Sometimes refs just completely whiff.Understood, but it certainly goes to determining if it was flagrant or with mal-intent. Certainly wasn’t. What about that poke in the eye to Correnti (I believe it was him). Why wasn’t that called then? That wrestler was hitting the head.
Go RU!
Diane
The following was posted on BWI on November 5.Same claims of BS would be said by your PSU faithful on all that we are saying here but of course in the land of Blue and White you guys sh*t roses. We aren’t happy with offense but you don’t make that call. Period.
I agree that having this call will hopefully bring light to the subject being a problem but only if it was blatant.
I usually would agree, but coach smith did that after a reversal and he is widely considered the classiest guy in wrestling (after Abro).
The following was posted on BWI on November 5.
"Supposedly, all college refs have been informed that a major point of emphasis this year is hands to the face. Wrestlers are allowed to put their hands on an opponent's forehead. However, there is basically a triangle between the eyebrows and the chin. If a wrestler puts his hand in the triangle area of an opponent while on their feet, there is not supposed to be any warning -- the ref is supposed to stop the action and award a point to the wrestler whose opponent placed their hand in the face triangle area.
Per the college ref, the college ref community has also been informed that if they do not enforce this point of emphasis, they will lose assignments. In short, this truly is a major point of emphasis."
So, the NCAA appears to have taken subjectivity out of it. Either the hand was in the face or it wasn't. Intent doesn't matter. Force doesn't matter. Slipping doesn't matter. Blatant or not doesn't matter. Make the call, or you're losing good reffing gigs.
Yes, it is stupid. But, it was called exactly how the NCAA wants it called. Your issue should be with them and zero offense in 11 minutes.
NOW that it has affected an RU kid you're going to be watching? Maybe be concerned about the direction of the sport, not just one incident with your team.Well, we’ll be watching to see if ALL the refs are now making those calls for EVERY program.
It is such a huge point of emphasis that it hasn't been called once in any of our matchesThe following was posted on BWI on November 5.
"Supposedly, all college refs have been informed that a major point of emphasis this year is hands to the face. Wrestlers are allowed to put their hands on an opponent's forehead. However, there is basically a triangle between the eyebrows and the chin. If a wrestler puts his hand in the triangle area of an opponent while on their feet, there is not supposed to be any warning -- the ref is supposed to stop the action and award a point to the wrestler whose opponent placed their hand in the face triangle area.
Per the college ref, the college ref community has also been informed that if they do not enforce this point of emphasis, they will lose assignments. In short, this truly is a major point of emphasis."
So, the NCAA appears to have taken subjectivity out of it. Either the hand was in the face or it wasn't. Intent doesn't matter. Force doesn't matter. Slipping doesn't matter. Blatant or not doesn't matter. Make the call, or you're losing good reffing gigs.
Yes, it is stupid. But, it was called exactly how the NCAA wants it called. Your issue should be with them and zero offense in 11 minutes.
The following was posted on BWI on November 5.
"Supposedly, all college refs have been informed that a major point of emphasis this year is hands to the face. Wrestlers are allowed to put their hands on an opponent's forehead. However, there is basically a triangle between the eyebrows and the chin. If a wrestler puts his hand in the triangle area of an opponent while on their feet, there is not supposed to be any warning -- the ref is supposed to stop the action and award a point to the wrestler whose opponent placed their hand in the face triangle area.
Per the college ref, the college ref community has also been informed that if they do not enforce this point of emphasis, they will lose assignments. In short, this truly is a major point of emphasis."
So, the NCAA appears to have taken subjectivity out of it. Either the hand was in the face or it wasn't. Intent doesn't matter. Force doesn't matter. Slipping doesn't matter. Blatant or not doesn't matter. Make the call, or you're losing good reffing gigs.
Yes, it is stupid. But, it was called exactly how the NCAA wants it called. Your issue should be with them and zero offense in 11 minutes.
Ah, good point about Heil. His allowing a shot, then diving for an ankle and holding on for a stalemate led to an actual rule change. The new (as of last year) danger position swipes, leading to a TD awarded were instituted almost exclusively due to him. That is one the NCAA got right, as the rule has led to more action from guys close to that position. Hands to the face? Not so much.Correct my issue is with offense and the NCAA (and the refs). As an observer of Heil against AA it would drive me insanely nuts to watch him win while literally doing nothing but defending. But the guy won. Felt that same way last night and neither wanted to go out to shoot and take it. Both of them were not wrestling to win and rather wrestling to not lose. There is a difference. Hope it changes NS for the better come March.
So, you've watched every match your guys have wrestled? And, if it hasn't happened, the refs should just make it up, because it's a point of emphasis? Okay.It is such a huge point of emphasis that it hasn't been called once in any of our matches
Correnti got hosed on the back points but he has to hang on with 30 seconds left. Same with Glasgow
A million likes.I stated before years ago 200 people watched Rutgers wrestling and yesterday was over 8,000.So what comes with that are more people that don't understand the rules or people who only watch Rutgers wrestle.Nobody likes the way the match ended but a rule is a rule and everyone who follows the sport closely knows that this has been called across the country over and over and over this year.I hate the rule and think it's gonna put a huge black eye on our sport on Saturday night when a NCAA title is decided by a hands to the face.Multiple matches at the NCAA tournament will be decided by hands to the face.I have been to multiple opens this year and have seen numberous matches decided by hand to the face
Correnti because Geer best position is top.And Glasgow I would guess because of the knee and Shomers best position is also topHow come both Correnti and Glasgow didn't take bottom? It seems they each left one point on the mat by choosing neutral.