ADVERTISEMENT

Mel Tucker to sign 10 Yr $95M Contract

I have no idea why Tucker draws the wrath and ire of The Rutgers Rivals board, it can’t possibly be because he adopted the word chop for his team?
If you don’t think he can coach that’s fine, but my perception is it goes way beyond that.
Same goes for the guy at Maryland.
Why have these guy become so hated?
I don’t hate Tucker - I just think he’s not worth nearly $10mil per year for his track record. Unless they shock Penn State, MSU is not even making a bowl. If he really kept the $100k bonus for himself while making that much $, he’s also selfish and greedy - I hope for his sake that’s not true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSU_Nut
LSU was rumored to be after him.
Even so, no one is worth that much. There are other coaches out there. A $95 million contract for a coach is ridiculous. A 10 year contract is also ridiculous. University presidents should get together and stop this insanity. All coaching contracts should be no longer than two years, with a rollover possible for one additional year at the end of each season. That way, universities are not on the hook for tens of millions of $$ just for a coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FastMJ and brgRC90
I have no idea why Tucker draws the wrath and ire of The Rutgers Rivals board, it can’t possibly be because he adopted the word chop for his team?
If you don’t think he can coach that’s fine, but my perception is it goes way beyond that.
Same goes for the guy at Maryland.
Why have these guy become so hated?


lot of t-shirts... not just one....

poster_525ee671c8714689a784d3b1bfdda6c7.jpg
 
Even so, no one is worth that much. There are other coaches out there. A $95 million contract for a coach is ridiculous. A 10 year contract is also ridiculous. University presidents should get together and stop this insanity. All coaching contracts should be no longer than two years, with a rollover possible for one additional year at the end of each season. That way, universities are not on the hook for tens of millions of $$ just for a coach.

Nobody will sign if they can't recruit 5 full classes. 6 might work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BeantownKnight
Even so, no one is worth that much. There are other coaches out there. A $95 million contract for a coach is ridiculous. A 10 year contract is also ridiculous. University presidents should get together and stop this insanity. All coaching contracts should be no longer than two years, with a rollover possible for one additional year at the end of each season. That way, universities are not on the hook for tens of millions of $$ just for a coach.
Coach salaries are out of control the way player contracts were in baseball in the 80s. They can't just keep rising.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rufeelinit
I would be salty if I were a MSU fan.

I mean you’re paying your HC that much money and Mel Tucker is what you spend it on?

Look at the other names making that much
 
I have no idea why Tucker draws the wrath and ire of The Rutgers Rivals board, it can’t possibly be because he adopted the word chop for his team?
If you don’t think he can coach that’s fine, but my perception is it goes way beyond that.
Same goes for the guy at Maryland.
Why have these guy become so hated?
I don't hate Mel Tucker at all. I'm just amazed that this is a guy who has extremely limited success even experience as a college head coach is among the highest paid. It's just baffling to me.
It's like the old saying. "How much is he worth? As much as somebody wants to pay him."
 
Bowl games: Schiano will earn $75,000 for a non-College Football Playoff “Group A” bowl game appearance and $75,000 for winning the bowl game. The Belk, Music City and Quick Lane Bowls (and successor games) are considered “Group A.” All other non-CFP bowl games are considered “Group B," and Schiano earns $100,000 for appearing in one and $100,000 for winning one.

Schiano will earn $150,000 for appearing in a New Year’s Six bowl game and can earn another $150,000 for winning one. He earns $200,000 for qualifying for the College Football Playoff, $250,000 for appearing in the national title game and $350,000 for winning a national title.


Love these contract clauses. Bonuses for making a bowl? Ok, I can live with that. Additional bonuses if he actually wins a bowl game? That's a coaches job...to win games! Schiano is already drawing a salary for his duties. There should be clauses for salary deductions if the team has piss poor seasons or they lose a bown game.
 
I have no idea why Tucker draws the wrath and ire of The Rutgers Rivals board, it can’t possibly be because he adopted the word chop for his team?
If you don’t think he can coach that’s fine, but my perception is it goes way beyond that.
Same goes for the guy at Maryland.
Why have these guy become so hated?
People love to hate. I don’t hate any coach anywhere.
 
I wouldn’t say I go out of my way to hate Tucker. I was just commenting on the post about him keeping a 100k bonus which was intended for him and his assistants. Any way you cut it, that’s just a dick move. Other than that, he’s completely overpaid for a generally mediocre track record.
 
Even so, no one is worth that much. There are other coaches out there. A $95 million contract for a coach is ridiculous. A 10 year contract is also ridiculous. University presidents should get together and stop this insanity. All coaching contracts should be no longer than two years, with a rollover possible for one additional year at the end of each season. That way, universities are not on the hook for tens of millions of $$ just for a coach.
I don't know if you're serious, but such a deal between University presidents would likely be held illegal as a violation of the antitrust laws. It would be considered an agreement in restraint of trade and, as we saw with the NCAA's restrictions on athletes, such deals often do not survive judicial scrutiny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rutgersal
That's not even D3. That's club teams

So what.
Why does that matter?

"It's not fair that schools with richer alumni bases get to throw around and spend money others don't have. How can Rutgers be expected to compete against those schools. It's not a level playing field."

This is the exact argument many give against NIL.
What's the difference with money going directly to the AD?
Do we have the alumni money to offer a $95m contract if we wanted?
Or fire a coach 4 weeks early like Nebraska and spend an extra $8m?
 
100k is not a lot to spread among an entire staff in the scheme of these contracts, but that's still a dick move. The lower level assistants could have used the extra cash. Happy Holidays, Mel!
That has to be the greediest move by a head coach since Kirk Ferentz had his kid live in section 8 housing with rent subsidized by taxpayers while those who really needed had to wait.
 
I wouldn’t say I go out of my way to hate Tucker. I was just commenting on the post about him keeping a 100k bonus which was intended for him and his assistants. Any way you cut it, that’s just a dick move. Other than that, he’s completely overpaid for a generally mediocre track record.
How do you know he kept it, most of what the press writes is complete BS and void of context, I can assure you of that based on first hand knowledge.
The concept of paying the head coach a sum of money so he can split it up and write checks to his coaches is ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rutgersal
This what RU is up against. If they have alumni willing and able to fund that kind of money for him, the school has so much more to fund NIL for star players . RU has only about 15000 alumni even donating to our teams out of hundreds of thousands of alumni.
 
How do you know he kept it, most of what the press writes is complete BS and void of context, I can assure you of that based on first hand knowledge.
The concept of paying the head coach a sum of money so he can split it up and write checks to his coaches is ridiculous.
That’s how bonus pool money is distributed. Given from head of division (AD) to head of department (head coach) to be distributed to employees (assistant coaches).
 
How do you know he kept it, most of what the press writes is complete BS and void of context, I can assure you of that based on first hand knowledge.
The concept of paying the head coach a sum of money so he can split it up and write checks to his coaches is ridiculous.
We’ll have to agree to disagree on that concept then. I used to do that for my team, albeit a small one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zappaa
That’s how bonus pool money is distributed. Given from head of division (AD) to head of department (head coach) to be distributed to employees (assistant coaches).
No it ain’t.
Write a personal check to Mel Tucker to pay his staff…not a chance.
The fact the press distorts, sensationalizes and lies stands.
 
Last edited:
No it ain’t.
Write a personal check to Mel Tucker to pay his staff…not a chance
Where does it say personal check? It says:


“ athletics director Alan Haller awarded Tucker the $100,000 bonus that the contract says will be paid each year to the football program and allocated among Tucker, his assistant coaches and the program’s other staff members”

It was Mel Tucker that was meant to distribute those funds. He decided to distribute directly to his bank account.
 
Where does it say personal check? It says:


“ athletics director Alan Haller awarded Tucker the $100,000 bonus that the contract says will be paid each year to the football program and allocated among Tucker, his assistant coaches and the program’s other staff members”

It was Mel Tucker that was meant to distribute those funds. He decided to distribute directly to his bank account.
I’m calling complete Horse Shite!
Allocated to the football program!
Why would Mel Tucker decide who gets what?
His secretaries, support staff, volunteers, assistants…you expect a head coach to divvy that up.
Such BS
 
I posted this in the coaching carousel thread. It was “only” 14M from one of the billionaire boosters. I’m guessing it was something similar rather from the other booster rather than the 81M left. I assume the school took on the rest. So maybe 30-35M from the two boosters and 60-65M from the school over the 10 years.

I’d rather try to find guys like Liepold hired for under 3M and only just now bumped up or a guy like DeBoer hired for about 3M and now just bumped to a little over 4M. This idea that you have to pay that much for mediocre results is wrong imo. I like Mark Stoops and think he’s done an excellent job at Kentucky but his contract bumped recently to 9M is too much too IMO. He quickly went out and lost to Vandy after it too lol. Same for Drinkwitz as Mizzou bumped from 4M to 6M for nothing and also followed it up with a loss. Pay Saban 20M a year and I don’t care he’s worth every penny but paying these guys who have done nothing or not nearly enough is poor fiscal responsibility IMO and bad business.


 
So what.
Why does that matter?

"It's not fair that schools with richer alumni bases get to throw around and spend money others don't have. How can Rutgers be expected to compete against those schools. It's not a level playing field."

This is the exact argument many give against NIL.
What's the difference with money going directly to the AD?
Do we have the alumni money to offer a $95m contract if we wanted?
Or fire a coach 4 weeks early like Nebraska and spend an extra $8m?

Not sure if you are serious. Are you saying RU has less affluent alumni base than MSU, Iowa and Nebraska? For that matter Alabama & Mississippi? Penn St.? Florida and Florida St? NC State?
 
I’m calling complete Horse Shite!
Not saying it is reality. More likely someone has an axe to grind. But that is 100% how bonuses are allocated in most financial institutions that I have been associated. As stated earlier in thread. I was part of bonus pool meetings for many years and was surprised that high 6 figure 7 figure partners would squirrel away an additional 15-50k rather than giving to back office guys making 30k.
 
Not saying it is reality. More likely someone has an axe to grind. But that is 100% how bonuses are allocated in most financial institutions that I have been associated. As stated earlier in thread. I was part of bonus pool meetings for many years and was surprised that high 6 figure 7 figure partners would squirrel away an additional 15-50k rather than giving to back office guys making 30k.
I respect your personal corporate world experience.
Not how it works in sports.
The head coach is an employee.
Do you think my dad was ever put in the position to divvy up money amongst his staff?
Do you think Boone is?
I know my dad was very generous at Christmas with his personal staff with his own money
 
Last edited:
I’m calling complete Horse Shite!
Allocated to the football program!
Why would Mel Tucker decide who gets what?
His secretaries, support staff, volunteers, assistants…you expect a head coach to divvy that up.
Such BS
While I am no fan of Tucker, you are right. Media narratives suck. Harbaugh gets a pass for some of his antics, which have pretty much subsided in recent years. Let the coaches be judged on their records, and also, keeping the team out of trouble. The tunnel incident is fair game for Tucker. But this bonus story seems fishy.

 
While I am no fan of Tucker, you are right. Media narratives suck. Harbaugh gets a pass for some of his antics, which have pretty much subsided in recent years. Let the coaches be judged on their records, and also, keeping the team out of trouble. The tunnel incident is fair game for Tucker. But this bonus story seems fishy.

Who’s keeping track of the personal checks Tucker writes to his secretaries and personal assistants as a thank you every year?
He may be an awful coach, not worth the money and MSU may regret this extension…I get it.

But the media are such liars it makes me sick
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift
Not sure if you are serious. Are you saying RU has less affluent alumni base than MSU, Iowa and Nebraska? For that matter Alabama & Mississippi? Penn St.? Florida and Florida St? NC State?

What does alumni base have to do with anything?

According to every other thread we have less NIL opportunities than every other program in the country because of our fanbase.

Easy question: Could Rutgers afford a $95m contract extension? If not, why not?
We are in the same conference and receive relatively the same conference payout as MSU.
 
Even so, no one is worth that much. There are other coaches out there. A $95 million contract for a coach is ridiculous. A 10 year contract is also ridiculous. University presidents should get together and stop this insanity. All coaching contracts should be no longer than two years, with a rollover possible for one additional year at the end of each season. That way, universities are not on the hook for tens of millions of $$ just for a coach.
That called collusion and is an Anti trust lawsuit waiting to happen
 
I don't think anyone hates Tucker just that these coaches are rewarded for mediocrity
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT