Haha, the rapist throws his 4th pick of the night. Love it!
Yeah but Hunt is still playing
The way he viciously beat that girl in the hotel, he should not be in the NFL.
Especially when Rice was bounced out for a similar act
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha, the rapist throws his 4th pick of the night. Love it!
Once again, Jackson and Baltimore tanking tonight. Not much time left for them to turn it around.Put $200 on Baltimore, +140
Hit on GB and the over early and pushed on a live bet in the late game. Also bet shortest TD over 1.5 yards in all 4 games. So far, 1-1 on those.
Today I have Cleveland +10, KC to win by 7-12, and the over in the late game. Kinda like AB to score at +225. We'll see.
Put $200 on Baltimore, +140
The game was very competitive. It turned on one play.I don't know about betting the money line but I definitely thought the Ravens would be more competitive.
Maybe they need to start taking a long look at themselves.
That's two years in a row of non-competitive blowouts in the playoffs.
Yeah...but that was SOME play.The game was very competitive. It turned on one play.
I'm really glad it seems all the grest young QBs are in the AFC:
Mahomes
Mayfield
Allen
Herbert
Burrow
Jackson
Watson
Lawrence (presumably to Jax)
Meanwhile the NFC top QBs are all old and should be clearing the way for the Giants:
Brady
Rodgers
Brady
NFC QBs left:
Wilson
Goff
Trubisky(?)
Wentz(?)
Dak(?)
That play never happens in the 20th century.What guts on 4th down with backup quarterback.
Is there a worse rule in sports that the one which burned the Browns at the end of the first half? Anywhere else on the field, if you fumble forward and the ball goes out of bounds, you retain possession at the point of the fumble. However, if you fumble forward into the end zone and the ball goes out of bounds, you lose possession on the touchback. Why the inconsistency?
Goff is a product of his system, he doesn't do anything special. Wilson and Dak (presuming he returns completely healthy) are difference makers now. Murray probably is as well , would like to see a bit more from him though. Tannehill has been a top 10 QB the past 2 years, not sure if he figured things out or is a product of his OC, we'll see with Smith going to ATL. Wentz has a ton of issues to fix and from recent reports he isn't likely to work on them. Maybe Trubisky can have a Tannehill style resurgence with the right OC, but I'll believe it when I see it.
You obviously also forgot about Darnold in the AFC.😉Crap. Forgot about Murray in the NFC.
Hopefully he has a "Watson" situation.
Great player but held back by bad head coaching.
My big worry is Atlanta/Lions drafting Fields and Wilson.
Would prefer they keep their downward trending older QBs for as long as possible.
No there isnt. I wouldn't be surprised if that rule is revisited in the offseason. I could even see letting the offense keep the ball but push them back to the twenty. But to award the ball to the defense for a fumble they didnt recover seems ludicrous to me.Is there a worse rule in sports that the one which burned the Browns at the end of the first half? Anywhere else on the field, if you fumble forward and the ball goes out of bounds, you retain possession at the point of the fumble. However, if you fumble forward into the end zone and the ball goes out of bounds, you lose possession on the touchback. Why the inconsistency?
Just put the ball at the spot where the fumble occurred and let offense keep it. Not like the offense did anything wrong.No there isnt. I wouldn't be surprised if that rule is revisited in the offseason. I could even see letting the offense keep the ball but push them back to the twenty. But to award the ball to the defense for a fumble they didnt recover seems ludicrous to me.
I agree it’s a bad rule. Could rule have been implemented because of raiders win in 70s when Dave Casper “fumbled” ball towards end zone and beat Chargers.Is there a worse rule in sports that the one which burned the Browns at the end of the first half? Anywhere else on the field, if you fumble forward and the ball goes out of bounds, you retain possession at the point of the fumble. However, if you fumble forward into the end zone and the ball goes out of bounds, you lose possession on the touchback. Why the inconsistency?
No, the "Holy Roller" play resulted in the rule that if a player fumbles the ball forward and another player on the same team recovers it the ball is placed back at the spot of the fumble. The touchback/safety fumble out of the end zone has always been the rule as far as I know. No idea why. The safety part makes sense, maybe they just made the fumble out of the offensive end zone a touchback to keep it uniform, you punish the fumbling team either way.I agree it’s a bad rule. Could rule have been implemented because of raiders win in 70s when Dave Casper “fumbled” ball towards end zone and beat Chargers.