ADVERTISEMENT

NIL numbers

arent coaches salaries public..why is this any different...arent taxpayers funding these sports even if they are not funding the NILs...if we are paying players we have a right to now...even NIL supporters should know

are nfl and mlb and nhl and nba contracts public
Players haven't signed employment contracts with RU. If they did they'd be public.
 
why not...i like transparency especially if players want to be treated as professionals
I cannot imagine the SCHOOL would want NIL deals made public. If I'm Steve Pikiell, I don't want X player knowing what Y player got paid in NIL, as it sets an unofficial precedent and then every player would *expect* at least that amount or more.
 
why not...i like transparency especially if players want to be treated as professionals
I dont think all professionals have their salaries made public. if things evolve past where they are today (unions, schools involved in payments vs. private deals, etc)...then I think you can make the argument to make them public.
 
Endorsement deals aren't made public typically and they certainly shouldn't be mandated to be.

It's private enterprise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletKid2008
I cannot imagine the SCHOOL would want NIL deals made public. If I'm Steve Pikiell, I don't want X player knowing what Y player got paid in NIL, as it sets an unofficial precedent and then every player would *expect* at least that amount or more.

this is the real answer
Which is why people should support literally everyone's salary being public.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PhillyRU
What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Count your nil and start hunting players on other p6 teams that will play well with who’s coming in and back. Sadly no more loyalty or rooting for a guy just root for you colleg….professional team. Shame on those who looked at NIL through rose colored glasses and didn’t look at the beast they were creating. It’s supposed to be for student athletes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac
What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Count your nil and start hunting players on other p6 teams that will play well with who’s coming in and back. Sadly no more loyalty or rooting for a guy just root for you colleg….professional team. Shame on those who looked at NIL through rose colored glasses and didn’t look at the beast they were creating. It’s supposed to be for student athletes.
bingo....pandoras box was open and it wasnt good...rather odd that some want to hide it now
 
  • Like
Reactions: darkcheck
I dont think all professionals have their salaries made public. if things evolve past where they are today (unions, schools involved in payments vs. private deals, etc)...then I think you can make the argument to make them public.
are they getting their education being payed for under some charade at a university
 
  • Like
Reactions: darkcheck
Paul's was way higher than Cam. And loads of tampering going on as we speak with Rutgers players and 3 Ivy players I know of, especially from some SEC coaches and another coach who I am still trying to confirm and who is relatively local.
Fake news?
 
Now that Dartmouth has voted to unionize, the party is over. I can't imagine how many schools are going to just cave in and ditch sports altogether. Probably not worth it.
 
This whole thread is silly because it's all rumors and possibilities but no facts.

Here are actual documented facts.

Ke'lel Ware went from Oregon to Indiana.....Indiana has a bad coach.....Mgbako went to Indiana and isn't going to the NCAAS....but he at least got his shot attempts and exposure.

Bronny James probably helped sell USC hoops season tickets but a heart ailment and some injuries derailed a promising "potential " season....Georgetown paid a ton of money to finish 10th out of 11 teams in a vastly overrated Big East.....the only reason they're not last is because DePaul still exists as a program.

I can add other facts but NIL is the biggest overhyped item that generates more clicks than almost anything.

NIL isn't saving Mike Woodson, didn't save Chris Holtmann and has Mick Cronin on the hot seat out at UCLA....Sean Miller, a known cheater before NIL was "legit", now has to actually work to coach when everyone else can retain their players or secure others.

NIL is the best thing to happen to college sports. Because in another year or two, donors and schools will "correct " the market and someone will be smart enough to actually determine legitimate value for football and basketball players. So a overhyped former 4* recruit gets an updated snapshot of reality when they don't produce. And an underrated unranked recruit, gets his bag, because he or she earned it.

The smarter coaches and programs will NOT burn lots of money on NIL and wisely select, research and properly assess every player. Keep in mind, Jeremiah Williams is actually more productive than Mulcahy by a LOT and I could argue is better overall as a guard than Cam Spencer. There are more Jeremiah Williams kids coming from a Temple or Cam Spencer from the Patriot League, that warrant getting paid, vs some unknown or unproven HS recruit.

But, keep pushing the NIL hype train....the more you overhype players like Cam Spencer and Mawot Mag, the more money they actually make.....Maybe if we as fans "stop feeding the hype" the market corrects itself and RU actually finds better players.
 
These are private citizens conducting private business deals. No way to single them out from every other citizen using the law and force them to disclose their personal private dealings. The only way to have transparency like that would be if there were a player's union.
Lol that's coming. Dartmouth players literally unionized this afternoon.
 
Most programs want to see every player get something. I'd be shocked if every basketball player at RU isn't getting some NIL money. Some more than others.

At a minimum they are getting Alston fund money.
They are. Isn't this already known? That's what the collective is doing

They might have to put something together for Jeremiah Williams. He's crucial, mag I love what he brings to the team. When he's fully healthy and himself he changes the game, and he's improving as an offensive player. But the way he gets injured it's risky if funds are limited. Hurts to let him go but......hold on he's an overseas player, mag and cliff can't receive nil right? Or do I have that wrong?
Yes, keeping JWill is essential to next season's success

agree. J will > Mag
I think everyone agrees. JWill is awesome. He's the best player on this team. Imaging him driving and dishing to Dylan and Ace next year. Players capable of scoring
 
I see that point BUT what about the kids getting straight-up cash (see: NOT "NIL" but "pay-for-play)??

In some states, like NJ thankfully when the law is finally applicable next year, that's no longer against the rules.
 
Got a feeling Mag wont be with us next year.

J.Will correct me if im wrong will be on his like 4th team? Wouldn't he have to sit or did they do away with that rule? Temple, Iowa State and us along with the gambling ordeal that i believe is still pending. i do not think he goes anywhere as he will start on a team with two lottery picks. Get him a bag early.
 
Someone just posted that NIL is "overhyped." That is the single most hysterical post in the history of many hysterical posts on this board. And that is not hyperbole. There is no develpment in the history of college sports and specifically football and basketball more significant. None. One example that person used was Mick Cronin at UCLA. Cronin has virtually no NIL money. Nor does the football coach there and that is why UCLA is in deep trouble. Unless you have a deep and significant war chest, there is no chance of success in the Power 6. We are talking at a bare minimum of $55,000 for every football starter and probably $75,000 for every basketball starter with the number smuch higher at many places. Higher like the 2.5 million that the Duke qb got to go to ND.,etc. Certainly, there are third parties like Fanatics who can assist the cause and Rutgers basketball is the beneficiary there. Those who protest the most about NIL are firmly in the camp of I don't or will never donate. Fortunately, there are many others who take the opposite approach. If Rutgers did not have a semblance of a war chest in football, then the roster would look dramatically different. Please no one buy into the NIL is not significant false narrative.
 
Got a feeling Mag wont be with us next year.

J.Will correct me if im wrong will be on his like 4th team? Wouldn't he have to sit or did they do away with that rule? Temple, Iowa State and us along with the gambling ordeal that i believe is still pending. i do not think he goes anywhere as he will start on a team with two lottery picks. Get him a bag early.
I don’t think 3rd transfers have been tested but if the NCAA isn’t allowed to make 2nd transfers sit out there doesn’t seem to be any logical reason they’d be able to regulate 3rd transfers.
 
.....and NIL will bury a lot of non revenue sports. Sports that were comfortably able to exist before $ came in to college sports
 
I can’t wait until this thing blows up and we actually have some structure , caps, and stability in this whole thing.

First facilities and head coach salaries then.. it was the transfer change rules .. then every institution/ conference going for TV money grab… and now NIL, and unrecognizable “conferences “

Notice how the ncaa didn’t set up rules or limits against any of this and all of it got completely out of hand.

and yes , there wasn’t any limits because the blue bloods literally are the NCAA so why would they want rules that limit their advantages
 
.....and NIL will bury a lot of non revenue sports. Sports that were comfortably able to exist before $ came in to college sports

Donations and resources are going to NIL instead of to the athletic department

Ehhhhh...."resources" from the school can't go there. Also, many of these sports have VERY devoted alumni, with deep pockets, who will take care of NIL for now.
 
Someone just posted that NIL is "overhyped." That is the single most hysterical post in the history of many hysterical posts on this board. And that is not hyperbole. There is no develpment in the history of college sports and specifically football and basketball more significant. None. One example that person used was Mick Cronin at UCLA. Cronin has virtually no NIL money. Nor does the football coach there and that is why UCLA is in deep trouble. Unless you have a deep and significant war chest, there is no chance of success in the Power 6. We are talking at a bare minimum of $55,000 for every football starter and probably $75,000 for every basketball starter with the number smuch higher at many places. Higher like the 2.5 million that the Duke qb got to go to ND.,etc. Certainly, there are third parties like Fanatics who can assist the cause and Rutgers basketball is the beneficiary there. Those who protest the most about NIL are firmly in the camp of I don't or will never donate. Fortunately, there are many others who take the opposite approach. If Rutgers did not have a semblance of a war chest in football, then the roster would look dramatically different. Please no one buy into the NIL is not significant false narrative.
How is possible that a big school like UCLA with a ton of history of winning doesn't have any NIL?

That seems strange to me. I would assume there are plenty of rich successful alumni to tap into
 
  • Like
Reactions: seneca ave
why not...i like transparency especially if players want to be treated as professionals

Professional athletes endorsement/NIL deals aren't public either.

Their team salary is public.
Just like a college player scholarship (team salary).
 
Which is why people should support literally everyone's salary being public.

There is something to be said about corporations (not just college athletics) actively trying to discourage compensation conversations among staff.

Public transparency ensures the company is being equitable to everyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fluoxetine
Were they not earmarked in the past? Wouldn't a donor who was interested in supporting non-revenue sports previously still be interested?
some....it will definitely impact revenue sports which increases the loss of the athletic department as a whole which leads to the athletic department having to cut costs.

If you are a donor who wants to see your team win. Are you donating to endow a coaching spot (pre NIL) OR are you giving to a collective?

Yes many donations are going from practice facilities to NIL in player's pockets, but there were plenty of money being donated that indirectly or directly reduced the athletic department losses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac
also I am less concerned about other schools poaching our talent and much much much more concerned with the ability or want of Pikiell to poach other schools talent
Rutgers poaching must be limited to shooters similar to Spencer and a possible need for a replacement for Cliff at center.Players returning need intensive player development to assist Bailey and Harper generate a offense that can score at least 70 points a game. Status quo decision making will result in deep disappointment.
 
So playing college sports is officially a unionized job. All athletes will unionize. Great. We can finally just end college sports. They have been a sham for decades. Think of all the free time you will have without college sports. I really don't care at this point.
 
There is something to be said about corporations (not just college athletics) actively trying to discourage compensation conversations among staff.

Public transparency ensures the company is being equitable to everyone.
Exactly. People are so hesitant to discuss their compensation and the result is the balance of power shifts towards the employer because they have all the information and the candidates do not. People don't know except in extremely broad strokes what their true market value is.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT