For those of you who like chaos, tomorrow could be your lucky day!
Here are the scenarios:
1) Mets win, D-Backs lose. (Braves result irrelevant.)
This is the simplest and least controversial scenario. Braves advance as WC2 and go to San Diego. Mets advance as WC3 and stay right where they're at, in Milwaukee. D-Backs out. Monday DH cancelled.
2) All three teams win; OR all three teams lose; OR Mets lose, D-Backs lose, Braves win .
Braves clinch, either because they won or because the D-Backs lost. However, Mets still need to win one more game. So the DH proceeds as scheduled. If Braves sweep, D-Backs are in and Mets are out.
Here's the potential controversy. The last thing the Braves want to do is play what for them is a meaningless DH. If they lose the first game, then all is settled and the second game is likely cancelled. Do they tank?
3) Mets lose, D-Backs win, Braves win.
Braves clinch by virtue of their win. Mets now have to sweep the DH, otherwise they are out and D-Backs are in. The problem for the Mets is, the Braves will be highly motivated to win the first game, so they don't have to play the second!
4) Mets win, D-Backs win, Braves lose.
Now it gets complicated. No one has clinched anything yet, and they have to play the DH. The winner of the first game is in. However, the second game must be played, because if the loser of the first game can salvage the split, they too are in. If either team sweeps, the loser is out and the D-Backs are in. If the Mets win the first game and clinch their spot, we can expect to see a lot of Brazoban, Ottavino, and the Youngs in game 2.
5) Mets lose, D-Backs win, Braves lose.
D-Backs clinch. Mets and Braves play the DH, and the Mets must sweep. This will be the most difficult scenario for the Mets. It might actually be advantageous for them if the Braves win tomorrow,
Crazy, no? I think I have it right, but no promises.
Here are the scenarios:
1) Mets win, D-Backs lose. (Braves result irrelevant.)
This is the simplest and least controversial scenario. Braves advance as WC2 and go to San Diego. Mets advance as WC3 and stay right where they're at, in Milwaukee. D-Backs out. Monday DH cancelled.
2) All three teams win; OR all three teams lose; OR Mets lose, D-Backs lose, Braves win .
Braves clinch, either because they won or because the D-Backs lost. However, Mets still need to win one more game. So the DH proceeds as scheduled. If Braves sweep, D-Backs are in and Mets are out.
Here's the potential controversy. The last thing the Braves want to do is play what for them is a meaningless DH. If they lose the first game, then all is settled and the second game is likely cancelled. Do they tank?
3) Mets lose, D-Backs win, Braves win.
Braves clinch by virtue of their win. Mets now have to sweep the DH, otherwise they are out and D-Backs are in. The problem for the Mets is, the Braves will be highly motivated to win the first game, so they don't have to play the second!
4) Mets win, D-Backs win, Braves lose.
Now it gets complicated. No one has clinched anything yet, and they have to play the DH. The winner of the first game is in. However, the second game must be played, because if the loser of the first game can salvage the split, they too are in. If either team sweeps, the loser is out and the D-Backs are in. If the Mets win the first game and clinch their spot, we can expect to see a lot of Brazoban, Ottavino, and the Youngs in game 2.
5) Mets lose, D-Backs win, Braves lose.
D-Backs clinch. Mets and Braves play the DH, and the Mets must sweep. This will be the most difficult scenario for the Mets. It might actually be advantageous for them if the Braves win tomorrow,
Crazy, no? I think I have it right, but no promises.