It's not that the rule isn't warranted or that it should be done away with, it's the subjectivity that kills me. Since this "sticky stuff" rule has been in place, 7 players have been suspended for 10 games. 3 have been Mets. Umpires seem to handle this arbitrarily. Last year, the Yankees' Clark Schmidt was checked and told to simply go wash his hands. He remained in the game and wasn't suspended. Unless there's some universal test that yields results in black and white, this rule, as currently constituted, is BS. The Mets just lost their closer for what is basically 11 games in pivotal stretch because an umpire decided his hands were "too sticky" (whatever that means to that man, during that game, on that night).
Diaz is checked every upon entering every single game. I'd like to think he's not stupid enough to rub up his hands with something questionable enough to get him tossed from a crucial game and suspended for an even more crucial stretch. His explanation does make sense. He said he does the same thing prior to each appearance and will continue to do the same thing moving forward.
Add this to the cavalcade of rallying points surrounding this team through the first 12 weeks of the season:
- Seymour Weiner
- Rally Pimp
- Jorge Lopez glove toss
- Grimace era
- Diaz' sticky stuff