Wondering the same. Looks like an old man.BTW I was shocked how thin Phil was. Is he sick?
Wondering the same. Looks like an old man.BTW I was shocked how thin Phil was. Is he sick?
He had lost around 25 pounds prior to the '23 Masters. I guess he's still on the diet which includes or at least did include fasting.BTW I was shocked how thin Phil was. Is he sick?
I love my Pacheco KC jersey. So happy my Chiefs got a RU player. I tried to find Marcus Cooper’s jersey but couldn’t find it. Guess nickel DBs don’t get a lot of love.I still wear my #23 Brian Leonard jersey (no name just number) from the 2006 season to games, I guess I am remiss in my duties as a grown man
I’d have to sadly agree.I still wear my #23 Brian Leonard jersey (no name just number) from the 2006 season to games, I guess I am remiss in my duties as a grown man
His “diet” is a marketing play for his coffee.He had lost around 25 pounds prior to the '23 Masters. I guess he's still on the diet which includes or at least did include fasting.
I remember the announcers talking about his special coffee drink but didn't know he was hawking it.His “diet” is a marketing play for his coffee.
He’s on Ozempic
Phil needs money.I remember the announcers talking about his special coffee drink but didn't know he was hawking it.
You don't want Big Carmine breaking your thumbs because you're way behind paying the bookiePhil needs money.
Seems like a case of exactly who owed who?Does phil really mix it up with a bunch of “guys”?
I’ve heard the rumors about him owing money to some people who know people
In the industry that’s called leverage. Lefty Two-Strokes out here fleecing a bunch of goombas, you love to see itSeems like a case of exactly who owed who?
"A mob-connected bookie from Grosse Pointe Park handled lucrative bets for Phil Mickelson and was accused of cheating the PGA Tour golfer out of $500,000, according to federal court records obtained by The Detroit News."
![]()
Lefty and Dandy Don: How a Grosse Pointe bookie allegedly cheated Phil Mickelson
Court file reveals PGA star Phil Mickelson placed big bets with a mob-connected bookie from Detroit who allegedly cheated the golfer out of $500,000.www.detroitnews.com
Also reports he wasn't wearing a yellow raincoat but a non uniform orange one.Eyewitness account says the cop was running after or along side the car and fell. SMH
I don’t think that matters. The point is that this is at most a moving traffic violation. Stretching it o a felony assault is abuse of power.Also reports he wasn't wearing a yellow raincoat but a non uniform orange one.
The orange raincoats were for private security.I don’t think that matters. The point is that this is at most a moving traffic violation. Stretching it o a felony assault is abuse of power.
The orange raincoats were for private security.
Agree that it's sounds like they are stretching the truth. Didn't they have a hearing today?
By then the matter will be settled'I believe the hearing was pushed to June 3rd.
LOLI'll go by this and not a lawyers statement
>Gillis, dressed in full LMPD uniform and a reflective rain jacket, stopped Scheffler and attempted to give him instructions, but the subject “refused to comply and accelerated forward,” dragging the officer to the ground, damaging his uniform pants, valued at approximately $80, “beyond repair.”<
(I do like the damaged pants part)🙃
![]()
See the report details from Louisville police about Scottie Scheffler's arrest at PGA Championship
An arrest citation detailed the circumstances surrounding Louisville police's arrest of Scottie Scheffler early Friday morning, before the second round of the 106th PGA Championship. Scheffler, the No. 1 ranked golfer in the World, wagolfweek.usatoday.com
Or killed by a coolerThankfully no one was shot
I think this is an overreaction by the cop (and charges will be dropped) but I don't think this is the "initial" incident. We need to see what happened before this video (which I am sure doesn't exist since this camera is blocked by cars). This video just appears to be him catching up to Scottie after an incident.
This one seems clear enough that the whole thing is completely fabricated. Anyone else surprised he didn't throw a cooler at him to try and kill him?
Agree that this doesn’t appear to be the “initial” interaction as they both entered the view from a similar location hidden by the traffic.I think this is an overreaction by the cop (and charges will be dropped) but I don't think this is the "initial" incident. We need to see what happened before this video (which I am sure doesn't exist since this camera is blocked by cars). This video just appears to be him catching up to Scottie after an incident.
I doubt there was much, if any more interaction before this.Agree that this doesn’t appear to be the “initial” interaction as they both entered the view from a similar location hidden by the traffic.
I believe that is all of it. If fits the description of many eye witnesses accounts. He was approached by the 2nd cop and he proceeded about another 10 yards by all accounts.Agree that this doesn’t appear to be the “initial” interaction as they both entered the view from a similar location hidden by the traffic.
Really? Please provide a link to these many accounts. The one guy who early on talked about it said the officer attached to the vehicle. Attached could mean a couple things, but nothing I’d consider that is visible in the video.I believe that is all of it. If fits the description of many eye witnesses accounts.
Huh? There is no movement of the vehicle when officers are next to him in this video, there is an approximate 10 yard movement from where the vehicle’s view was obstructed.He was approached by the 2nd cop and he proceeded about another 10 yards by all accounts.
Really? Please provide a link to these many accounts. The one guy who early on talked about it said the officer attached to the vehicle. Attached could mean a couple things, but nothing I’d consider that is visible in the video.
Huh? There is no movement of the vehicle when officers are next to him in this video, there is an approximate 10 yard movement from where the vehicle’s view was obstructed.
There's enough on this thread. Do your own homework. Besides you posted a video that says 10 yards too.Really? Please provide a link to these many accounts. The one guy who early on talked about it said the officer attached to the vehicle. Attached could mean a couple things, but nothing I’d consider that is visible in the video.
Huh? There is no movement of the vehicle when officers are next to him in this video, there is an approximate 10 yard movement from where the vehicle’s view was obstructed.
One witnesses' account seems to put Scheffler in the wrong .
But since there was another officer has been said said to have waved him along and that made Scottie feel he could keep going, it might be a case of Scottie being confused when he continued going after being told to stop by a second cop directing traffic
>ESPN’s Bob Wischusen, the Jets play-by-play voice for ESPN NY radio, was in a van along with Jeff Darlington, who documented Scheffler’s arrest on his phone and reported extensively on the events that day.
Wischusen stayed in the van but still had a view of the confrontation and provided new details and further context on the scene that shocked the sports world in an exclusive interview with Golf.com.
The longtime ESPN voice said Gillis approached Scheffler’s car as the vehicle pulled past the ESPN van on the left.
“Whoa, whoa, whoa, who are you? Where are you going? Get back in line. You’re not allowed to come through here,” Wischusen said of Gillis’ initial interaction with Scheffler.<
![]()
‘Tripped and fell’: Witness’ cop claim as fresh details over Scheffler arrest emerge
‘Tripped and fell’: Witness’ cop claim as fresh details over Scheffler arrest emergewww.foxsports.com.au
I seen where the cop was accused of overreacting and believe that's true.IF you read the actual Golf.com interview, Wischusen seems tend to blame the cop moreso than Scheffler. He says it was the cop that flipped out first after Scheffler pulled around the ESPN van. After speaking, Scheffler started to move and from where Wischusen was sitting in the van, it looked like the cop just tripped trying to chase the car. He said he can't speak for Darlington's claim about attaching to the car just that it being dark, wet and there were outcrops in the median, looked like the cop just fell.
Ha. Those are words used by someone that can’t support their view.There's enough on this thread.
My “homework” already supported what I wrote.Do your own homework.
Yes, 10 yards after the first interaction. The vehicle in the video doesn’t move when an officer is next to it. Thus, there was an earlier interaction we can’t see.Besides you posted a video that says 10 yards too.
You see it move on the video. There was no officer being dragged. Are you saying it moved 10 yards twice now?Ha. Those are words used by someone that can’t support their view.
My “homework” already supported what I wrote.
Yes, 10 yards after the first interaction. The vehicle in the video doesn’t move when an officer is next to it. Thus, there was an earlier interaction we can’t see.
Watch the interview with Jeff Darlington. The video you think is the initial video is the secondary incident.You see it move on the video. There was no officer being dragged. Are you saying it moved 10 yards twice now?