That's actually a little less than had been projected.Alonso signs $14.5 million arbitration deal.
McNeil filed for $7.75M and the Mets filed for $6.25M. Based on prior estimates, the Mets filing is the more realistic. I am guessing they will come to an 11th hour agreement to avoid the arbitration process, which can get nasty.McNeil the only player we didn't agree with arb on.
I was thinking it would be more for the batting championMcNeil filed for $7.75M and the Mets filed for $6.25M. Based on prior estimates, the Mets filing is the more realistic. I am guessing they will come to an 11th hour agreement to avoid the arbitration process, which can get nasty.
Give the man the extra money, he won the batting title and has been extremely productive since he's been called up years ago. Has to be frustrating to see all the money thrown around when you've been a huge part of the organization for several years. Uncle Stevie has the money.I was thinking it would be more for the batting champion
I would hope it may just be a precursor to a longer term extension that they are working on.Give the man the extra money, he won the batting title and has been extremely productive since he's been called up years ago. Has to be frustrating to see all the money thrown around when you've been a huge part of the organization for several years. Uncle Stevie has the money.
Lol they're not trading McNeil because of a possible arb dispute.I would hope it may just be a precursor to a longer term extension that they are working on.
But I hate to even say this- makes McNeil super attractive as trade…
Let's hope the first part or your response comes true, as I don't want any part of him being traded. Just like Nimmo, he works pitchers counts and is a pain in the ass for opposing pitchers. We got 2 of those guys in the lineup with a couple others that do that, but not to the extent those 2 do, and I love that fact. When they do bat 1 & 2 on occasion, it's Lenny and Wally to me.I would hope it may just be a precursor to a longer term extension that they are working on.
But I hate to even say this- makes McNeil super attractive as trade…
I meant his salary, if correct and still being under some control- makes him very attractive to other teams. They would not be trading him because of a dispute. And doubt it would happen but, it makes him very attractive to use if let’s say, you wanted to pry a certain 2 way player from another team a year early.Lol they're not trading McNeil because of a possible arb dispute.
That's still no reason to deal McNeil. Angels wouldn't want a 30 year old about to get a bigger deal. They want prospects.I meant his salary, if correct and still being under some control- makes him very attractive to other teams. They would not be trading him because of a dispute. And doubt it would happen but, it makes him very attractive to use if let’s say, you wanted to pry a certain 2 way player from another team a year early.
Uncle Stevie baby!!!They're also giving Baptist $1.1 million. He's an OF. Giving SS Larez a $1.5 million bonus.
Not really. There are established bonus pool limits. Basically an international bonus pool capUncle Stevie baby!!!
Actually they're pretty low. Padres signed the considered #1 sign for $5.6 million.Uncle Stevie baby!!!
I get that, my point was money spent internationally won't stop Uncle Stevie from spending in Free Agency. I'd believe other teams it would.Not really. There are established bonus pool limits. Basically an international bonus pool cap
I dn't think they have any intention to trade him. My point was that it is a very low number for a guy that is a batting champion and it didn't seem like an outliner season for him.That's still no reason to deal McNeil. Angels wouldn't want a 30 year old about to get a bigger deal. They want prospects.
It does seem odd that Alonso will be paid twice as much as McNeil this year. But the Mets offer to McNeil was right on line with the MLB Trade Rumors estimate, which was based on prior comparables.I dn't think they have any intention to trade him. My point was that it is a very low number for a guy that is a batting champion and it didn't seem like an outliner season for him.
I also don't think they are going to trade for S.O. when they can buy him next year anyway. I was just making a point that if I were another team and the Met's come to me for a mega deal trade- I would be asking for McNeil because of how team friendly that contract is for a known commodity.
He can also defend. We have enough hitting. Need speed and defense for the late innings.Can't . . . hit . . . a . . . lick . . .
Why not just sign a track guy.
Not just games with a lead in the late innings but also games in the late innings where we trail and need a run. Jankowski can score from first on a double as a pinch runner. It does not have to be Jankowski, I just want someone who can defend late and gives us some speed for those situations.The late innings aren't somehow exempt from the need for hitting. If you mean just the ninth inning in games with a lead, then that's mostly OK. But there is so little room for a guy who can't hit at all on a team. Jankowski's a last resort for just about any roster.
Keep listing them, each of the moments to have someone with speed. Yet there is no requirement that, to address those situtations, you must sign a guy with speed who can't hit. How about a guy with speed who can hit? Jankowski is a last resort, a roster deficiency.Not just games with a lead in the late innings but also games in the late innings where we trail and need a run. Jankowski can score from first on a double as a pinch runner. It does not have to be Jankowski, I just want someone who can defend late and gives us some speed for those situations.
Don’t give Manfred any more ideasA hypothetical for you:
Let's say that Manfred decrees that the Mets are banned from making any more 2023 transactions. They are allowed one more free agent signing. That's it.
Whom do you sign?
My vote is Duvall.
Speedy guys who can hit are currently not available in the FA pool. We were talking about the remaining free agents. Do you want to see Ruf in LF late in a game or Vogelbach as a tying run on first late? If the Mets can land someone speedy who can hit I am all for it.Keep listing them, each of the moments to have someone with speed. Yet there is no requirement that, to address those situtations, you must sign a guy with speed who can't hit. How about a guy with speed who can hit? Jankowski is a last resort, a roster deficiency.
Let's just say that this isn't the only situation that comes up late in games. Maybe you're hyper-focused on it and overplayng its importance. If the Mets don't have a speedy guy who can hit, they have to make a decision about what they will need more often and what will allow them to win the most games. I'll leave that to those who construct the roster, but I won't just muse into existence a plethora of late game needs for a fast guy that outweighs the need for other things that are generally more imporant in baseball, like hitting and good pinch hitters. I will say, though, that Jankowski stinks.. . . Do you want to see Ruf in LF late in a game or Vogelbach as a tying run on first late? . . .