ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Syracuse’s New Fieldhouse opening next month

In the mind of some Rutgers fans:
  • No new fieldhouse = Schiano gets free pass.
  • New fieldhouse = Schiano gets free pass
  • Limited NIL $s = Schiano gets free pass
  • Unlimited NIL $s = Schiano gets free pass
 
  • Like
Reactions: Section124
Fieldhouses weren’t invented yet. Instead Miami had amazing other types of support AL will tell us about. Maybe it was the campus pool or a futuristic library. Or the variety of grass at the Orange Bowl.
What they had was an NFL quality coaching staff, a recruiting strategy. and superior player development that produced multiple 1st round draft picks and NFL Hall of Famers. And most importantly, that potential was realized on the field.
 
They went to a BCS bowl. We didn’t.

The field house is just an excuse for you and Schiano to string us along. He needs to show results now. If he does, maybe people get on board and it gets built. However his track record shows a ceiling of 10 wins in a weak conference. The best we can ever expect with him in the B1G is 7-8 wins. We need a coach with a modern offense. Otherwise we are going no where.
We had our BCS bowl shots against WV in ‘06 and Louisville in 2012 and blew them. Very difficult to win on the cheap. He is going to make every effort to maximize his results, but it won’t be easy. With our present level of support, we are probably looking at 4-7 wins most years.

Terry Shea brought a modern West Coast Offense to Rutgers in ‘96. He could never recruit enough kids to properly run it. People swore up and down for years and years that all we needed to do was run the spread, and then we would be successful.
Now the latest ask is an offensive minded head coach.

It’s all nonsense. In the college game it’s the alignees that matter most, not the alignment.
You can’t get the best alignees if your value proposition is weaker than the competition. Penn State, Ohio State, and Michigan have access to a pool of high caliber recruits that wouldn’t give Rutgers a second look. Because they can see that Rutgers doesn’t have the support of the aforementioned programs. Quincy Porter from Bergen Catholic is a prime example of such a recruit who is going to Ohio State.

If our quarterback was slightly more Accurate against Nebraska, UCLA, and USC, no one would be talking about how we need a modern offense. He just has to get better.
 
We had our BCS bowl shots against WV in ‘06 and Louisville in 2012 and blew them. Very difficult to win on the cheap. He is going to make every effort to maximize his results, but it won’t be easy. With our present level of support, we are probably looking at 4-7 wins most years.

Terry Shea brought a modern West Coast Offense to Rutgers in ‘96. He could never recruit enough kids to properly run it. People swore up and down for years and years that all we needed to do was run the spread, and then we would be successful.
Now the latest ask is an offensive minded head coach.

It’s all nonsense. In the college game it’s the alignees that matter most, not the alignment.
You can’t get the best alignees if your value proposition is weaker than the competition. Penn State, Ohio State, and Michigan have access to a pool of high caliber recruits that wouldn’t give Rutgers a second look. Because they can see that Rutgers doesn’t have the support of the aforementioned programs. Quincy Porter from Bergen Catholic is a prime example of such a recruit who is going to Ohio State.

If our quarterback was slightly more Accurate against Nebraska, UCLA, and USC, no one would be talking about how we need a modern offense. He just has to get better.
Until shown otherwise, Rutgers will never have the level of consistent fan and financial support (excluding conference provided payouts) that benefits OSU, PSU, Michigan, Nebraska, Oregon and Iowa etc. so get that pipe dream out of your head. That's an arms race Rutgers clearly doesn't have the $$$$ resources to win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimpeg
We had our BCS bowl shots against WV in ‘06 and Louisville in 2012 and blew them. Very difficult to win on the cheap. He is going to make every effort to maximize his results, but it won’t be easy. With our present level of support, we are probably looking at 4-7 wins most years.

Terry Shea brought a modern West Coast Offense to Rutgers in ‘96. He could never recruit enough kids to properly run it. People swore up and down for years and years that all we needed to do was run the spread, and then we would be successful.
Now the latest ask is an offensive minded head coach.

It’s all nonsense. In the college game it’s the alignees that matter most, not the alignment.
You can’t get the best alignees if your value proposition is weaker than the competition. Penn State, Ohio State, and Michigan have access to a pool of high caliber recruits that wouldn’t give Rutgers a second look. Because they can see that Rutgers doesn’t have the support of the aforementioned programs. Quincy Porter from Bergen Catholic is a prime example of such a recruit who is going to Ohio State.

If our quarterback was slightly more Accurate against Nebraska, UCLA, and USC, no one would be talking about how we need a modern offense. He just has to get better.
Your fantasy boyfriend at UK would have been 3-0 in those games, ain’t that right Manti T’eo Al of La Mancha ?
 
The facts say otherwise. We scored 7 points against Wisconsin and 7 points against Nebraska.
You’re right that we’re not the high caliber team we thought we were.

But the offense did rebound with 32 points against UCLA and 20 points against USC. Let’s see what happens this week.
Points don't matter. wins matter. Points do bring wins. But you need to have more than your opponent on a given day. RU has a problem doing this. Wish there was some way that we could start with a clean slate. Ala Indiana. New everything. Program coaches. Players. Fan support Financial support. Wishful thinking. Because it never has occurred and may never do so. I enjoyed yesterday No RU game to agonize over. Just good FB to watch selectively
 
Until shown otherwise, Rutgers will never have the level of consistent fan and financial support (excluding conference provided payouts) that benefits OSU, PSU, Michigan, Nebraska, Oregon and Iowa etc. so get that pipe dream out of your head. That's an arms race Rutgers clearly doesn't have the $$$$ resources to win.
Had a very bad call in the 2012 game that screwed us
 
Had a very bad call in the 2012 game that screwed us
And besides Townsend's drop v WVU in 2006, didn't the refs miss a Slaton fumble we recovered?? I was seconds away from booking a flight to Miami for the Orange Bowl. Already had the hotel. Ouch!
 
Last edited:
I just read an article about UCONN basketball and why they don't want a nice facility. You go there to work, it's not a spa. All the recruits know that. On top of that it's in the middle of no where. Get top coaches/great offensive philosophy here and make that the draw.
You forgot a bag full of money.
 
The facts say otherwise. We scored 7 points against Wisconsin and 7 points against Nebraska.
You’re right that we’re not the high caliber team we thought we were.

But the offense did rebound with 32 points against UCLA and 20 points against USC. Let’s see what happens this week.
You thought, not we👌
 
What syracuse gets, what other schools get doesn't mean a thing to me.
W-L is what gets it , in my book,and what support other schools get doesn't excuse RU and the coaching staff for not being good enough to make a minor bowl game.
When talking about making playoffs or major bowls , then I'll admit what support the programs get makes a difference between getting there or falling short.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DHajekRC84
We had our BCS bowl shots against WV in ‘06 and Louisville in 2012 and blew them. Very difficult to win on the cheap. He is going to make every effort to maximize his results, but it won’t be easy. With our present level of support, we are probably looking at 4-7 wins most years.

Terry Shea brought a modern West Coast Offense to Rutgers in ‘96. He could never recruit enough kids to properly run it. People swore up and down for years and years that all we needed to do was run the spread, and then we would be successful.
Now the latest ask is an offensive minded head coach.

It’s all nonsense. In the college game it’s the alignees that matter most, not the alignment.
You can’t get the best alignees if your value proposition is weaker than the competition. Penn State, Ohio State, and Michigan have access to a pool of high caliber recruits that wouldn’t give Rutgers a second look. Because they can see that Rutgers doesn’t have the support of the aforementioned programs. Quincy Porter from Bergen Catholic is a prime example of such a recruit who is going to Ohio State.

If our quarterback was slightly more Accurate against Nebraska, UCLA, and USC, no one would be talking about how we need a modern offense. He just has to get better.
coaching perhaps?
 
We will continue to recruit good classes, but it will be more difficult to do so given Syracuses success. Fran Brown now has something he didn’t previously have: credibility, results, and a fine football facility. A lot of effort already goes into finding and vetting players that are suitable for Rutgers. Now more effort will be needed.
If we have had good classes then it would seem the field house is not the issue. It's the inability to win games despite good recruits.
 
If we have had good classes then it would seem the field house is not the issue. It's the inability to win games despite good recruits.

Here is the response your going to get:

"We have good classes for Rutgers but can't compete with OSU, PSU etc."

Which is fine. But then explain the "Syracuse has passed us. We should't expect to beat UCLA or compete with Wisconsin".
It's the moving goalposts that is the funniest.

Nobody is saying we should be expecting to beat OSU and PSU.

But all this NIL/fieldhouse excuses is implying we shouldn't expect to beat any Big Ten team.
I.e. we are the worst program in the Big Ten?

But then we also need to praise the staff for getting us to where exactly?
 
If we have had good classes then it would seem the field house is not the issue. It's the inability to win games despite good recruits.
To get to where we want to go, which is to ultimately to win championships, we need better classes so we can land recruits like Quincy Porter, who wouldn’t give Rutgers a 2nd look. We also need more 4 ⭐️ and 5 ⭐️ OL and DL, which have been elusive. Jaelyn Mathew’s is the first 4 ⭐️ OL we’ve landed, and he is in our incoming class.
 
@RU-05
Predicted it perfectly

Johnny Carson Nbc 90Th Special GIF by NBC
 
To get to where we want to go, which is to ultimately to win championships, we need better classes so we can land recruits like Quincy Porter, who wouldn’t give Rutgers a 2nd look. We also need more 4 ⭐️ and 5 ⭐️ OL and DL, which have been elusive. Jaelyn Mathew’s is the first 4 ⭐️ OL we’ve landed, and he is in our incoming class.
Walk before you can run. Let's get to 8-10 win seasons before we worry about championships.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Section124
Here is the response your going to get:

"We have good classes for Rutgers but can't compete with OSU, PSU etc."

Which is fine. But then explain the "Syracuse has passed us. We should't expect to beat UCLA or compete with Wisconsin".
It's the moving goalposts that is the funniest.

Nobody is saying we should be expecting to beat OSU and PSU.

But all this NIL/fieldhouse excuses is implying we shouldn't expect to beat any Big Ten team.
I.e. we are the worst program in the Big Ten?

But then we also need to praise the staff for getting us to where exactly?
Where are our recent recruiting classes relative to the likes of Neb USC and UCLA?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickRU714
To get to where we want to go, which is to ultimately to win championships, we need better classes so we can land recruits like Quincy Porter, who wouldn’t give Rutgers a 2nd look. We also need more 4 ⭐️ and 5 ⭐️ OL and DL, which have been elusive. Jaelyn Mathew’s is the first 4 ⭐️ OL we’ve landed, and he is in our incoming class.
What? You were singing the praises of the 2022 and 2023 OL/ DL recruits. Saying they were going to immediately upgrade the room.




 
Get with the program. Jacob Allen took a medical retirement, or whatever you want to call it. Jasire Peterson is still developing.
Get with the program you said Jaelyn was the first 4 star. Disrespecting your own past prediction that the above mentioned Allen and Peterson (both 4 stars) would be the saviors of the program. Your constant denial of your previous posts is ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
Adonis Al of La Mancha - do you lick Schiano’s shoes while he’s got them on or sneak a taste of another pair without him knowing ? And, what do they taste like ?
I would guess he'd think H2O given the walk on water thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shelby65
Your offense doesn’t cease to function for two full games because of ONE injury to your left guard.
You are not remotely a high caliber team if your offensive output is dependent on the health of one offensive lineman
Va Tech scored 31 with its starting QB and another RB out and a offensive participation list with 5 other questionable. #excuses.. full stop.
 
Va Tech scored 31 with its starting QB and another RB out and a offensive participation list with 5 other questionable. #excuses.. full stop.
Be fair….Ash wasn’t the coach there 6 years ago. Schiano needs at least another 15 to make up for that.
 
And besides Townsend's drop v WVU in 2006, didn't the refs miss a Slaton fumble we recovered?? I was seconds away from booking a flight to Miami for the Orange Bowl. Already had the hotel. Ouch!

Let's not forget that we returned that fumble for a touchdown.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rurichdog
The offensive coaching wouldn't have been any better, and the talent would be sqandered, just like it's being squandered now.
The offensive coaching is just fine. We need better execution between the quarterback and receivers.
 
Get with the program you said Jaelyn was the first 4 star. Disrespecting your own past prediction that the above mentioned Allen and Peterson (both 4 stars) would be the saviors of the program. Your constant denial of your previous posts is ridiculous.
Peterson is a 3 star and Allen never played because he was damaged goods, so he doesn’t count. There was no way of knowing that.
 
Peterson is a 3 star and Allen never played because he was damaged goods, so he doesn’t count. There was no way of knowing that.
So the attached rankings don’t count because you changed the parameters. Does that ever get old to you? Throw so much shit at the wall than deny ever saying it years later when the shit doesn’t stick.

I am going back an honoring my pledge @Knight Shift you back on the pledge?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift
The offensive coaching is just fine. We need better execution between the quarterback and receivers.
I actually don’t think the passing game is the problem. We seem to do well when we throw more downfield. We should be throwing more to set up the run, which is opposite of what we are used to.
 
I actually don’t think the passing game is the problem. We seem to do well when we throw more downfield. We should be throwing more to set up the run, which is opposite of what we are used to.
Overall, he’s doing a good job, and is probably the best QB since Nova, and gives us a chance to win.
But he has room to grow.

He is late on some of his throws which is why they are behind the receiver.

At times needs to demonstrate better touch.
I counted three times during the USC game where Miller or Black had his coverage beat and a good throw would have either resulted in a TD or a pass interference. He did throw a really nice TD ball to Miller.

He is currently completing 54% of his throws. If he can lift that above 58% for these last four games, we should have a good chance to win, assuming the defense can reasonably improve.
 
The main issue is the defense. GS built this team to play “complementary football.” You can’t do that with a defense that is allowing 35+ PPG. I understand the injuries. But, injuries are a part of the game. You need to develop players for depth.
 
The main issue is the defense. GS built this team to play “complementary football.” You can’t do that with a defense that is allowing 35+ PPG. I understand the injuries. But, injuries are a part of the game. You need to develop players for depth.
Injuries are a part of the game, but the amount of injuries speaks to something more than bad luck. It could be a new training regiment, or changing of the diet that impacts the body, or straight up poor coaching techniques that put players in tough situations where injuries may increase. Who knows, but sometimes it's out of your control. My personal opinion is the assistant coaches play a bigger role in the teams misfortunes than anything else. It wasn't the players who took a big gulp of the poison (special season), but the coaches who sipped it. We don't seem as hungry or aggressive, and we don't make our own luck. Other teams seem to put in a backup and not see a major drop-off. Go look as some of the G5 and FCS teams and compare it to Rutgers. We seem unprepared once the key starters don't play.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT