We’ll see ...you were very wrong on the distribution timeline and as for the lasting effects of these vaccines many people are questioning that reasoning of not only you but others. The virus will continue to mutate and some will have a resistance to them. Others will be reinfected and perhaps not be as lucky. It was created in a lab and not a Pangolin ( which actually is a mammal I believe) being eaten by someone near the wet market. Strange how China last week did not allow the WHO to finally investigate and compare the findings from several countries. So keep up the “ it wasn’t a man created virus”.
You're so wrong it's not funny and you continue to post misinformation, which is not helpful at all. I was not "very wrong" on the distribution timeline. I simply quoted the government's estimate of 20MM vaccinated by early January - never promised it. I did say I thought we'd have 100MM vaccinated by the end of March, which I think is still realistic. You want me to link that post?
The virus will continue to mutate, but it will likely continue to mutate at a fairly slow rate, which is why most virologists feel the vaccines will likely be effective for a few years at least, although that's not 100% known and can't be known until we get there, but it's based on the best science out there (and as I just posted, it's looking very likely that the new variants will not be an issue for the current vaccines).
Finally, there is zero evidence that the virus was created in a lab and released. You spend way too much time reading conspiracy websites which are simply full of crap. It's impossible to disprove a negative, i.e., that it couldn't have been found in nature and accidentally released from a lab, but I'll go with the virologists on this one, i.e., that this virus evolved in bats and might've jumped to an intermediate hose, like SARS/MERS did, before jumping to humans, which is how every other virus in history infected humans.
Below is a link to the latest paper on synonymous coronavirus divergence indicating that the most recent common ancestor on the SARS-CoV-2 evolutionary line (between the bat coronavirus found in Yunnan Province which shares 96% of its genome with SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-2, itself) diverged about 50 years ago. Also, just because China didn't let the WHO in doesn't mean it came from a lab. It's just par for the course, given that China's transparency throughout this pandemic has been horrible - but that's how they roll, and again it doesn't mean the virus came from a lab.
https://academic.oup.com/ve/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ve/veaa098/6047024
Having said all that, we absolutely do need to be exploring potential origins of the virus and since more than a few folks seem to believe the accidental lab release theory is possible (but no virologists believe the virus was man-made that I know of) that ought to be evaluated also, if only to put the issue to bed. And keep in mind, that NY Mag article was written by someone with zero science background - it's an interesting story, but with many holes.