The employee is an idiot, and he/she will be dismissed in due course. Some people have no common sense or a sense of self-awareness. The case is unique to California based on California law. No wonder companies are leaving California in droves.The articles I saw indicated the law was on his side
Amazon is taking the stance that the Covid rules mandating things like WFH nullified their obligation but there is nothing in the law that provides an exception
Some people in the comments feel he is a front for Amazon to force people back to the office because he is fighting for an expense which was much less than his savings
"Employees are currently coming out ahead.
While I believe that the engineer will win--California law is pretty straightforward--he's not considering how much money he's saved by not going to work. Pre-corona Californians spent an average of almost 30 minutes commuting one way.
Even before gas prices began to skyrocket, people probably spent far more on gas than on they were spending on increased electricity and internet costs. As of June 9, 2022, Californians are paying an average of $6.403 per gallon of gas. The plaintiff argues that he's owed expenses between $50 and $100 per month. In pre-pandemic 2019, the average American used 34.5 gallons of gas per month. If working from home cuts gas usage in half, the engineer still comes out ahead. Not to mention wear and tear on the car and the cost of pants suitable for the office."
Amazon Engineer Sues for Work From Home Costs. Employees May Not Like it if He Wins
California does, indeed, require employers to pay all business costs, but do they need to pay for your increased electricity use?
www.inc.com