It will fade into the background when no new information/allegations come about. There were just new developments within the last few days, so I think it's understandable that it's going to be discussed. Also a good percentage of the posts in this thread are rebuttals of your very vehement defense of Paterno... Maybe your posts engender a response...?If I may, I think what theRU was trying to say to use your words is that invading Iraq is not something that's discussed here, pretty much no law suits are discussed on this board besides the Penn State story and any that are normally disappear after a day or two.
The Penn State discussion on this board has been going on for 5 years with no end in sight. I can understand wanting to come to this board to read about Rutgers 5 years from now and being annoyed that the same posters are still making the same arguments about penn state looking for anyone who will listen
Try to google "Paterno" and tell me the first 5 things that come up... It's all related to the recent items. This is not some obscure story. There was a New York Times editorial on this just yesterday. Like it or not, it's in the national consciousness, and we're in the same B1G division. It's not that hard to see why it's being discussed here.