ADVERTISEMENT

Poll: Should RU keep Flood or let him go

"Based on his body of work", coaching, recruiting and all other things HC related

  • Rutgers should Keep Kyle Flood

    Votes: 61 14.9%
  • Rutgers should let him go now or at the season end.

    Votes: 348 85.1%

  • Total voters
    409
  • Poll closed .
The logic can also be viewed as you have cancer and if you continue to treat the cancer the same way (i.e underpaying for a HC with the hope and prayer that Rutgers will have hired an up and coming success; or continuing to not invest in an old and antiquated infrastructure because you're concerned about media and political ramifications), then chances are the cancer will not go away, although you may believe the new HC is a miracle cure.

Treating the cancer the same way over and over again even though the treatment is not working would be what you will be doing if you keep Flood.
 
Last edited:
and so would replacing him with another underpaid Coach without proven experience and track record at a major level.
Absolutely, I'll take my chances...knowing we have NO CHANCE (sorry for the caps RUR85) with KF.
Quite frankly, I'm shocked you don't realize how bad he is for our players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NotInRHouse
Absolutely, I'll take my chances...knowing we have NO CHANCE (sorry for the caps RUR85) with KF.
Quite frankly, I'm shocked you don't realize how bad he is for our players.

My comments have nothing to do with KF. Currently the performance of the football team stinks and that's a result of KF, staff and the Administration, including the old Admin. that hired him in the first place. Until such time that the Admin. makes the decision to prioritize the football program and invest in the product, it's all window dressing. All Coaches that are willing to come into this environment for pennies on the dollar and w/o support from the Admin., is nothing more than shot in the dark.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU31trap
and so would replacing him with another underpaid Coach without proven experience and track record at a major level.

Hiring an unproven coach on the cheap might lead to another Flood => Possible but still a hypothetical

Flood sucks as a coach => NOT a hypothetical
 
  • Like
Reactions: lighty
Hiring an unproven coach on the cheap might lead to another Flood => Possible but still a hypothetical

Flood sucks as a coach => NOT a hypothetical

Based on results on the field, much greater than possible. As an example, took Dantonio until year 7 before his break through at the B1G level (3 years at Cincy, 3 years at Michigan State). Do you have 6 years of patience, where Rutgers makes a low level bowl game every other year and those off years goes home for the holidays, to support an unproven coach while he's training at Rutgers?

If the answer is yes, I applaud you. For most of this fanbase, the unproven coach will be run out of town prior to the completion of his 6th year and we'll start all over again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickyNewark51
My comments have nothing to do with KF. Currently the performance of the football team stinks and that's a result of KF, staff and the Administration, including the old Admin. that hired him in the first place. Until such time that the Admin. makes the decision to prioritize the football program and invest in the product, it's all window dressing. All Coaches that are willing to come into this environment for pennies on the dollar and w/o support from the Admin., is nothing more than shot in the dark.

By that logic why stop there? One could argue that if the good people of New Jersey cared about Rutgers the same way people in Alabama do with their university, then maybe the Admin will be forced to care.

Can't boil the ocean. In a simple root cause analysis you stop at the element that is easiest to change with the most impact.

It will be easier to hire an up and coming coach looking for a chance at the big leagues than to change the minds and the attitude of the Administration.
 
By that logic why stop there? One could argue that if the good people of New Jersey cared about Rutgers the same way people in Alabama do with their university, then maybe the Admin will be forced to care.

Can't boil the ocean. In a simple root cause analysis you stop at the element that is easiest to change with the most impact.

It will be easier to hire an up and coming coach looking for a chance at the big leagues than to change the minds and the attitude of the Administration.

It may be easier to change by replacing 1 person but that doesn't solve the problem if you believe the problem is more than 1 person. If you don't agree that the Administration is also to blame for the fact that we're at where we're at, then we have no conversation left.
 
Based on results on the field, much greater than possible. As an example, took Dantonio until year 7 before his break through at the B1G level (3 years at Cincy, 3 years at Michigan State). Do you have 6 years of patience, where Rutgers makes a low level bowl game every other year and those off years goes home for the holidays, to support an unproven coach while he's training at Rutgers?

If the answer is yes, I applaud you. For most of this fanbase, the unproven coach will be run out of town prior to the completion of his 6th year and we'll start all over again.

I don't disagree that there will be plenty of people clamoring for change if the new coach doesn't win the B1G East coming out of the gate. Will I be one of them? That depends. I was very patient with Schiano because you could see that he was putting in the pieces. Just like I am patient with Julie. I am not the type that only look at results. I am more interested in the elements that led to the results. For example, I tell kids all the time, never work for money. Never look at the money. Work for the opportunity to develop skills, and eventually the money will come.

Now when it comes to Flood. There is nothing to me that suggest this man is capable of developing into a good coach. None. Zero. Like I continue to state here, I have never met or seen a more incompetent man. But more than the incompetence, I do not like what he represents - a program held hostage by someone who isn't even an alumn and simply an egotistical booster on a power trip.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickyNewark51
What's more important? A good coach or a coach with experience at the P5 level?

For me, a good coach will likely be a good coach at any level. It's not a guarantee, but we've seen it time and time again. Just look at the top coaches in our division:

Urban Meyer -- Bowling Green (MAC -- coach of the year in the MAC), Utah (Mountain West coach of the year), Florida (won NC), Ohio State (won NC) early coaching resume included Colorado State and Notre Dame

Mark Dantonio -- Cincinnati (Conference USA -- led Cincy to first winning record in 23 years) -- early coaching resume included working of Ohio State w/Jim Tressel and Michigan State w/ Nick Saban

Jim Harbaugh -- University of San Diego (won back-to-back Pioneer League championships), Stanford (won coach of the year award)


The key is finding people who excel at the level they're at, whether it's winning the coach of the year or leading a team that hasn't won in a while to a winning record.

We can do better than Flood. There may be a lot of jobs open right now, but there are plenty of lower levels with coaches that are excelling -- coaches that will be the future great coaches in P5. People act like we can't afford a good coach. We may not be able to afford a good, name coach but that doesn't mean we can't afford a good coach. In fact, we probably can get one for what we're paying Flood right now.
 
It may be easier to change by replacing 1 person but that doesn't solve the problem if you believe the problem is more than 1 person. If you don't agree that the Administration is also to blame for the fact that we're at where we're at, then we have no conversation left.

Oh I agree the Admin is a big problem. I just think that's a much tougher nut to crack, if not near impossible. I'll tell you what though, winning in the same way 2006 happened will go a long way in changing that attitude.
 
I don't disagree that there will be plenty of people clamoring for change if the new coach doesn't win the B1G East coming out of the gate. Will I be one of them? That depends. I was very patient with Schiano because you could see that he was putting in the pieces. Just like I am patient with Julie. I am not the type that only look at results. I am more interested in the elements that led to the results. For example, I tell kids all the time, never work for money. Never look at the money. Work for the opportunity to develop skills, and eventually the money will come.

Now when it comes to Flood. There is nothing to me that suggest this man is capable of developing into a good coach. None. Zero. Like I continue to state here, I have never met or seen a more incompetent man. But more than the incompetence, I do not like what he represents - a program held hostage by someone who isn't even an alumn and simply an egotistical booster on a power trip.

All good points. I see Schiano's mission of building an FCS level Shea program into a competent FBS program as very different than the current position. Schiano had the advantage of a Big East conference that was changing over time, including programs that moved on to different conferences, and HC/Staff competition that was raided by other conferences on a yearly basis.

This situation is vastly different. These schools are not going anywhere and have a huge head start with resources and infrastructure. In addition, the new HC will be competing against some of the most experienced and successful HCs in the country in terms of producing winning teams with rosters of top talent. It will be a tough road for an up and coming, unproven coach, a road that he will most likely not have an opportunity to finish climbing without a fanbase and environment that is supportive and patient. I'm not convinced that will work here.
 
My comments have nothing to do with KF. Currently the performance of the football team stinks and that's a result of KF, staff and the Administration, including the old Admin. that hired him in the first place. Until such time that the Admin. makes the decision to prioritize the football program and invest in the product, it's all window dressing. All Coaches that are willing to come into this environment for pennies on the dollar and w/o support from the Admin., is nothing more than shot in the dark.
You are 100% accurate with your post. Unless a real commitment is made by the BOT & President to invest in our football program firing coach Flood for another poorly paid coach will net similar results. As a matter of fact I believe we could potentially do worse. Does anyone remember when we went from Graber to Shea?
 
You are 100% accurate with your post. Unless a real commitment is made by the BOT & President to invest in our football program firing coach Flood for another poorly paid coach will net similar results. As a matter of fact I believe we could potentially do worse. Does anyone remember when we went from Graber to Shea?

Yes, but I also remember going from Shea to Schiano.
 
gladiator-thumbs-down.gif
 
Bo Pelini, Dino Babers, or Pete Lembo would exponentially increase their salaries if we paid them what Flood gets.

Dino Babers already has 2 B1G wins this year. How about KF?

The "it could be worse than Flood tards" need to get it together. You really think that the next coach, even if he loses games, is going to have 6 arrests and an email scandal? You know how low the odds of that are?
 
Yes, but I also remember going from Shea to Schiano.
I give coach Schiano a great deal of credit for his ability to recruit. He was a good coach but not great. He was thoroughly outclassed by Kelly & Ridriguez year in and year out. Even Edsall at UCONN won two Big East Titles. As a recruiter he gets an A, as a coach he gets a C+.
 
This is great. I was at Monmouth Park this year when American Pharoah ran in the Haskell. When Chris Christie tried to give the trophy to the Zyatt Family the place broke out in boos and some sections did the Coliseum thumbs down thing. lol
 
I hope you understand that in ancient Rome, the thumbs down signal was actually the signal to spare someone's life, since it indicated, symbolically, that the person was to remain on earth. Thumbs up, in fact, meant death.

Through the years, via movies and the like, the meaning was turned on its head, but back in the day that was the factual consequence of a thumbs down or thumbs up verdict.
 
Last edited:
What's more important? A good coach or a coach with experience at the P5 level?

For me, a good coach will likely be a good coach at any level. It's not a guarantee, but we've seen it time and time again. Just look at the top coaches in our division:

Urban Meyer -- Bowling Green (MAC -- coach of the year in the MAC), Utah (Mountain West coach of the year), Florida (won NC), Ohio State (won NC) early coaching resume included Colorado State and Notre Dame

Mark Dantonio -- Cincinnati (Conference USA -- led Cincy to first winning record in 23 years) -- early coaching resume included working of Ohio State w/Jim Tressel and Michigan State w/ Nick Saban

Jim Harbaugh -- University of San Diego (won back-to-back Pioneer League championships), Stanford (won coach of the year award)


The key is finding people who excel at the level they're at, whether it's winning the coach of the year or leading a team that hasn't won in a while to a winning record.

We can do better than Flood. There may be a lot of jobs open right now, but there are plenty of lower levels with coaches that are excelling -- coaches that will be the future great coaches in P5. People act like we can't afford a good coach. We may not be able to afford a good, name coach but that doesn't mean we can't afford a good coach. In fact, we probably can get one for what we're paying Flood right now.

Bingo. It will take some effort but like you mentioned, you need to find someone who has been successful everywhere they have been, not someone who has never been a head coach anywhere before (ie Kyle Flood). The closest he ever got to being a head coach was when he was the AHC/OL coach at Delaware.
 
The argument that "Rutgers can't be a contender in the Big Ten without increased support from the administration" is not an argument to keep Kyle Flood on as head coach.

This isn't even about wins and losses, although I've always argued Flood was in over his head as an FBS HC. It's the fact that under Flood, everything about this program has gone backwards. The on-field product has devolved. There have been numerous off-field issues.

A new coach can't change the institutional issues at Rutgers, but there's a chance that coach might be able to keep us out of the news in a negative way, and at this point I'd take that.
 
What i'd really like to believe is that there is a comprehensive strategy in place with a timeline that reflects what is best for the program and the transition will quick without a lot of drama. What would really be nice is for the A-holes that are flapping their gums without engaging their brains not turn this into to a bigger fiasco that further damages the program and Makes RU a laughing stock.
 
Scary how pegged on 85/15 this has been from the start, hasnt waivered but a few pts the whole time. Very consistent results.
 
Anyone know how much revenue the football program produced under Shea? I'm guessing the difference between now and then could afford us Saban. JH is not stupid....if she doesn't wanna go broke, she'll replace the coach.
 
You'd have to be a complete moron to not know the influence the media has on the general population.
The general population thinks Flood is a buffoon
Slyker thinks he represents the general population.
 
I'm confused...as fans were impatient..as a man who likes the guy i hate to let him go this late not knowing if we can afford to hire a worthy improvement due to Barchi's frugality..i'm sure young QBs are coach killers so unless we can get a Rhule/Fuentes proven guy i'd side with 1 more half season to see if its youth at QB BUT I'm not confident...it looks like a dropoff in overall talent...i'd go with either scenario but don't think change for it's own sake is smart..


this is the same lame argument used two years ago
 
  • Like
Reactions: lighty
I voted dump him.

The reason one might vote to keep him, which I still believe, is that the selection of his replacement will be rife with the same flaws and limitations that have gone into the decision to keep him this long in the first place. This will get us a new coach with equal or less experience, equal or less recruiting relationships, etc. If my prediction is correct, then why go through the added expense and transitional pains only to eventually land in the same spot - a bottom third big 10 doormat.
Except this time we're not under the gun to find a replacement within 48 hours of Signing Day.

This time, we don't have to settle for apparently the only guy in the Hale Center who WASN'T on the phone to Schiano or booking a flight to Tampa.
 
I'm sure guys like Slyker felt the average RU fan loved Shea. I never met anyone in my entire section who didn't pray he got fired each day.

I imagine the feelings toward Flood are very similar. This feels just like the Shea era


there were a select few supporting Fred Hill Jr to the bitter end on the basketball board as well...and the same questions were raised, we cant fire him because it costs money and who will we hire...and we saw how that whole fiasco of trying to save money blew in TPs face
 
there were a select few supporting Fred Hill Jr to the bitter end on the basketball board as well...and the same questions were raised, we cant fire him because it costs money and who will we hire...and we saw how that whole fiasco of trying to save money blew in TPs face


Fred's replacement worked out well!
 
every football fan I talk to is laughing at RU right now and cant believe Flood still has a job. its getting embarrassing
 
  • Like
Reactions: brgossRU90
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT