What's more important? A good coach or a coach with experience at the P5 level?
For me, a good coach will likely be a good coach at any level. It's not a guarantee, but we've seen it time and time again. Just look at the top coaches in our division:
Urban Meyer -- Bowling Green (MAC -- coach of the year in the MAC), Utah (Mountain West coach of the year), Florida (won NC), Ohio State (won NC) early coaching resume included Colorado State and Notre Dame
Mark Dantonio -- Cincinnati (Conference USA -- led Cincy to first winning record in 23 years) -- early coaching resume included working of Ohio State w/Jim Tressel and Michigan State w/ Nick Saban
Jim Harbaugh -- University of San Diego (won back-to-back Pioneer League championships), Stanford (won coach of the year award)
The key is finding people who excel at the level they're at, whether it's winning the coach of the year or leading a team that hasn't won in a while to a winning record.
We can do better than Flood. There may be a lot of jobs open right now, but there are plenty of lower levels with coaches that are excelling -- coaches that will be the future great coaches in P5. People act like we can't afford a good coach. We may not be able to afford a good, name coach but that doesn't mean we can't afford a good coach. In fact, we probably can get one for what we're paying Flood right now.