Oh absolutely!! A clown who's signed up here in 2012 but your are never on here. I'm guessing you're the famous guy with many screen names and found an old batch that didn't get blocked. Again you haven't posted a single fact, quote. Something you can not dispute. I'm the smart one you're the guy in Mom's basement!
Barry Alvarez worked as AD until he was 75. Any in academia and athletics work into their 70s. Some people age well and can work longer.
That was not the point in response to the post. Many people do not retire at 65 if they are healthy and enjoy their work.
Define significant. We all develop cardiac issues as we age. In Hobbs’ case, he may have serious issues but that would also be a convenient excuse if something else was going on which is the real reason he’s leaving effective immediately.
Doesn’t matter to my point. Maybe urgent cardiac issues are why he’s retiring on the spot. Maybe that’s not the reason. It’s unwise to believe everything one is told. I believe it’s reasonable to question if the stated reason is the truth.
Did you just talk crap because I don’t post here that much lol? Wow how embarrassing!
" Many people do not retire at 65 if they are healthy"
Bro you started name calling out of the blue just because I shared info you (and I) don’t like. I don’t owe you an answer here.
Hard to believe this is the reason for no press conference. It’s just as plausible, if not more likely that Rutgers didn’t want him representing it publicly anymore due to some ugly matter. The more I think about it, the more fishy this sudden retirement sounds.
Correct. In 100% of deaths, the heart stops beating.
The info I shared was that he didn’t resign simply because of his heart. Are you dense?
Rutgers isn’t his healthcare provider. They aren’t bound by HIPAA. Common misconception.
False. Employers too. Medical info on employees can’t be disclosed.
Employers are not a covered entity.
I’ll let ChatGPT weigh in…
Did you see what I wrote after we learned what it was? I apologized for jumping the gun.
See, you are wrong as shown in the end of your own post. RU Employee health (covered entity) and HR have legitimate access to protected health information and need to secure/maintain privacy. The university writ large cannot make public someone’s health condition. Illegal.
It was not originally reported when the news first came out. It just said he was resigning or the news outlets did a poor job of getting the full information out.
I am surprised you, especially as a legal expert, accept Hobbs’ explanation at face value. Was Menendez truthful ? Nixon? OJ ?
It's in the nj.com story, which is mentioned in the second post of this thread. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt because I know you to be a good poster, but some of our fellow posters need to be publicly flogged for rumor-mongering.
Maybe illegal, but nothing to do with HIPAA from an HR standpoint. You’re making the jump that he is being treated by RU Employee Health. No where is that reported. Nice try though.
weak backtrack. Not about him, per se, but employers/employee health/HR in general. HIPAA applies. Patients’ (students and employees) PHI must be protected.
