ADVERTISEMENT

Rutgers under NCAA investigation...

Right...Kyle Flood...the gift that keeps on giving.

Julie Hermann too. We continue to pay for her inept tenure but hey we can say we had the first lesbian AD. An AD with gravitas would have found a way to can KF long before any of this
 
Sorry, but have to pile on here. Remember when you were talking about how Flood only recruited Rutgers Men and wouldn't stoop to the level of Slick Jimmy over in PA?

Not only was this guy possibly the most incompetent head coach in CFB, he was also a scum bag. The good news is that he will never get another opportunity to run a program into the ground.

Don't totally agree but it is hard to argue with your points.
 
We really didn't have much choice but to hire Flood given how Schiano left. I recall he wasn't the first choice, may not have been the second. We certainly had other options for AD -- a lot of them. A competent AD might have seen the writing on the wall after the 6-7 '13 campaign and had the gravitas and foresight to muster the financial support for a replacement. But we had Edith running the AD. PC kills
 
Last edited:
We really didn't have much choice but to hire Flood given how Schiano left. I recall he wasn't the first choice, may not have been the second. We certainly had other options for AD -- a lot of them.
If there aren't other options you put someone in charge as interim coach for a year then open the process up the next year. Flood never had any type of resume or experience suggesting he was ready to be a head coach at the FBS level.
 
I have a friend whom deals with these issues on a certain level with schools.

He had said worst case a few scholies, maybe some recruiting restrictions, and some wins maybe taken away.

Best, case, and most likely a fine and nothing else.

Since most was self reported and remediated (programs put in place and Flood is not here) the NCAA usually goes with a fine and perhaps some minor ding on something else.

Level 2, self reporting, and remediation make this really a non issue.

Examples - Stanford, WVU, and UCLA. These are Level 2 and with very minor penalties.

https://dailybruin.com/2016/09/16/n...sistant-football-coach-for-ethics-violations/

http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/media-center/news/west-virginia-commits-recruiting-violations

http://www.espn.com/college-sports/...ts-two-level-ii-ncaa-violations-stemming-2014
 
If there aren't other options you put someone in charge as interim coach for a year then open the process up the next year. Flood never had any type of resume or experience suggesting he was ready to be a head coach at the FBS level.

I agree but easier said than done. Didn't he go 9-4 his first year? It's hard to fire a guy after a 9-4 season. The time to fire him should have been after 2013 and that abysmal performance in the Pinstripe Bowl against ND. Two straight years of abysmal performances in bowl games. Who was the AD then ?
 
Flood is really the gift that keeps on giving. He will go down as one of the worse Head Coaches of all time.

Rutgers response:

Dear Rutgers Community:


Today, I write to you about the release of a Notice of Allegations (NOA) issued by the NCAA enforcement staff stemming from an investigation that began more than a year and a half ago into allegations that some members of the Department of Athletics had not been operating in full compliance with NCAA and University standards.


These allegations by the NCAA enforcement staff are primarily focused on issues that have been well reported and discussed throughout our community. The allegations are the result of a lengthy joint investigation with the NCAA enforcement staff. As you know, we have already taken significant remedial actions concerning many of these matters.


In the Spring of 2015, the NCAA began an inquiry into our athletics program. During the course of the review process, potential NCAA rules violations came to light involving the former head football coach and his communication with a member of the faculty on behalf of one of his student-athletes. Other possible violations were also identified in the prospective student-athlete host/hostess program used in the Department of Athletics and inconsistencies in the administration of the Department of Athletics drug testing procedures and policies. The University retained outside counsel for the investigation and has cooperated fully with the NCAA enforcement staff as the investigative process continued.


After more than eighteen months of inquiry and cooperation, the NCAA issued the NOA to the University, alleging seven violations of NCAA and University rules by two former football staff members, the Department’s host/hostess program, and a staff member with oversight of the drug testing program, and a charge to the University of a “failure to monitor” for part of its athletics program. A summary of allegations is provided below and further details can be found in the Notice of Allegations. Per NCAA enforcement legislation, the University has ninety days to formally respond to the NOA.


In an effort to be as transparent as possible while the infractions process continues, I thought it important to share some basic details, as well as the proactive steps that the University has already undertaken.


NCAA violations are designated as Level I and Level II, major violations, or Level III and Level IV, secondary violations. Our case has been given an initial Level II designation by the NCAA enforcement staff.


The alleged violations of NCAA bylaws include:


· The former head football coach is alleged to have provided a former student-athlete with an impermissible extra benefit by directly contacting a professor seeking special consideration for the student-athlete in an academic course relating to the 2014-2015 academic year. In addition, he is charged with failing to promote an atmosphere of compliance in the football program, violating the principles of NCAA head coach responsibility legislation. Both allegations are deemed Level II by the NCAA.


· A former assistant football coach is alleged to have had improper off-campus recruiting contact with a prospective student athlete in 2014 (Level III) and the NCAA has also charged the coach with unethical conduct for providing false or misleading information to the NCAA and the institution during the investigation. (Level II)


· The NCAA has alleged that between the 2011-12 academic year and the Fall of 2015, the Rutgers football host/hostess program, staffed by student workers, was not properly operated and supervised as required by NCAA legislation; that two student hostesses had impermissible off-campus contact and electronic correspondence with prospective student athletes; and that the former football director of recruiting impermissibly publicized the recruitment of prospective student-athletes. (Level II)


· It is alleged that between September 2011 and the Fall of 2015, the University and the Director of Sports Medicine employed practices and procedures that violated the institution’s drug-testing policy by: failing to notify the Director of Athletics of positive drug tests; along with the former head football coach, failing to implement prescribed corrective and disciplinary actions and penalties; and failing to identify select drug tests as positive in accordance with University policy. (Level II)


· Because of the scope of these alleged violations, the NCAA has also alleged that between 2011 and 2016, the University failed to monitor its football program regarding its host/hostess program and drug-testing program. (Level II)


The University has begun the process of reviewing the allegations in the NOA as well as assessing the level of severity assigned to each allegation by the NCAA enforcement staff. The University will comply with the NCAA process and submit its full response within ninety days followed by a hearing before the NCAA Committee on Infractions. The Committee will determine whether violations occurred, will consider aggravating and mitigating factors, and will ultimately decide what penalties should be assessed. The entire process may not be concluded until well into 2017.


The University has cooperated fully with the investigation since the start, including both the discovery and self-reporting of several of these violations. The University has also taken action against employees who violated the basic principles on which Rutgers stands and enacted measures to prevent future violations of NCAA bylaws including, but not limited to:


· The former Head Football Coach and former Assistant Football Coach involved in these alleged violations are no longer with the University and the two student host assistants have been terminated from their positions;


· Prior to his termination, after an initial review in the Fall of 2015, the University suspended the former Head Football Coach for three games and imposed a $50,000 fine.


· In August 2016, Rutgers instituted a comprehensive new drug testing policy as well as overhauled oversight and reporting lines of the drug test program and, in October 2016, a new chief medical officer assumed oversight of the drug test program;


· In November 2015, Pat Hobbs was hired as the new Director of Athletics after serving for many years as Dean of the Seton Hall College of Law and after serving as Ombudsman to the Office of the Governor to oversee compliance and ethics training and as Chairman of the New Jersey State Commission of Investigation;


· In 2016, the University hired an outstanding and highly qualified Senior Vice President for Enterprise Risk Management, Ethics and Compliance (ERM) and the Department of Athletics has added a Chief Compliance Officer, two new Directors of Compliance, and a new Coordinator of Student-Athlete Services and has committed a designated compliance staff member to work with the football program;


· The Department of Athletics launched a strategic plan initiative with a focus on compliance and risk management;


· A robust rules education program has been implemented, including monthly NCAA rules education during the academic year for coaching staffs, and the Office of Athletic Compliance and ERM have constructed a program to educate specific groups on various NCAA policies, institutional policies, and federal/state regulations;


· Head coaching contracts have been revised to include specific language regarding responsibilities in academics and compliance;


· The duties of members of the football host/hostesses program have been revised and regular compliance meetings with all program student workers are held.


We will continue to identify areas in which we can improve and implement new policies or procedures, if warranted. In addition, as we review the NOA, we expect to follow NCAA practices and precedents with respect to addressing those findings.


Rutgers is a proud member of the NCAA and of the Big Ten Conference and we must act in good faith and with the utmost integrity in our Department of Athletics. The strong leadership of Pat Hobbs, new Head Football Coach Chris Ash, and new Head Men’s Basketball Coach Steve Pikiell has us headed in the right direction.


Despite my disappointment over these allegations, I believe we are a stronger University because of our immediate and transparent response to them, and you have my word that we will continue to strive for excellence with integrity. In order to keep you abreast of developments in this process, we have set up a website at ncaaupdate.rutgers.edu.


Sincerely,


Robert Barchi

President
Hopefully in the scope of things...routine and lightweight stuff compared to the filth in the South....
 
I agree but easier said than done. Didn't he go 9-4 his first year? It's hard to fire a guy after a 9-4 season. The time to fire him should have been after 2013. Who was the AD then ?

It was a weak 9-4. Coaching decisions the end of the year had to have you questioning if he had the ability.

He had a great defense (he had nothing to do with) If they scored any points they would just turtle up the rest of the game.

If he had an interim tag he would have at least had to interview with actual candidates

Should call into his show and bury him
 
  • Like
Reactions: drewbagel423
We are not even good cheaters. We won ZERO games in the BIG with cheating.

This is so embarrassing that we are not even good at this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kjb32812
This has nothing to do with this past year.

But your statement is true when you look at the state of the program that was left to Ash. How bad would we have been if Flood didn't cheat? Maybe he would have been fired for cause sooner if some of those 16 players didn't get to play in games? Obviously it did not get us any sort of recruiting advantage.

I have to assume the sanctions won't be too bad. I'm sure Jerry Kill was made aware during the process and probably wouldn't have taken the job if it was going to be too detrimental.
 
Sorry, but have to pile on here. Remember when you were talking about how Flood only recruited Rutgers Men and wouldn't stoop to the level of Slick Jimmy over in PA?

Not only was this guy possibly the most incompetent head coach in CFB, he was also a scum bag. The good news is that he will never get another opportunity to run a program into the ground.

Not all. There were definitely posts warning against bringing in two of the criminals Flood brought in because they were known as bad guys in high school.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cicero grimes
Not all. There were definitely posts warning against bringing in two of the criminals Flood brought in because they were known as bad guys in high school.
Exactly. One thing about Greg I recall was if he visited a high school and a kid was not in class, he would not recruit him. He weeded out the bad apples before they ever got to campus.
 
This is why I was so angry at Flood and wanted him gone. It was the slippage off the filed from Greg that bothered me. One thing we had prior to Flood was a pretty pristine rep as a football program. Flood managed to destroy that as well as the on the field product. He never should have been paid out.
 
Winner. The only difference is Jurich managed to win.

I am sure Rutgers could win with the city of Louisville paying for new arenas in football and basketball. No bond payments is great for the bottom line.

Also having a school NOT RANKED in the USNEWS World report for the majority of 2000's has to help recruiting. Literally having no academic standards helps.
 
Julie Hermann too. We continue to pay for her inept tenure but hey we can say we had the first lesbian AD. An AD with gravitas would have found a way to can KF long before any of this

Right! And she did not can him, but rather give him a 2 year extension on his contract. That's how inept the thinking was in the Athletic department. Now we pay for it to whatever degree!
 
Gotta admit, there are some great posts ITT.

At this point, I think it is very clear what Rutgers needs to do...get Bobby Petrino on the phone ASAP.
 
That really wasn't her call. She wanted him gone.

Maybe. But she didn't make him gone. As I and others said at the time, she inherited Flood, but once she extended Flood, she owned him. If she knew he was a problem and didn't make the case to get rid of him, that is her fault. If she didn't know he was a problem, that is her fault too.
 
We fired the guy and that should count for something. That said, if our internal report didn't discover problems that were later uncovered by the NCAA, then we'll get hit with some penalties. What I'd really like to see are some Tressel-type show-cause penalties for Flood -- if he tries to get back into coaching there should be sanctions for any school stupid enough to consider him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUtix4me
Maybe. But she didn't make him gone. As I and others said at the time, she inherited Flood, but once she extended Flood, she owned him. If she knew he was a problem and didn't make the case to get rid of him, that is her fault. If she didn't know he was a problem, that is her fault too.

The combination of the two were deadly. Now the aftermath.
 
If I'm Barchi I walk into any meeting with the NCAA and just repeat: "North Carolina, North Carolina" in similar fashion to Belichick's "Seattle" presser.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-AGK
one good thing we know this has been addressed and fixes already have been put in place
I don't think this should be a major concern about what the NCAA will do, but is something that Rutgers must make sure never happens again.
 
We fired the guy and that should count for something. That said, if our internal report didn't discover problems that were later uncovered by the NCAA, then we'll get hit with some penalties. What I'd really like to see are some Tressel-type show-cause penalties for Flood -- if he tries to get back into coaching there should be sanctions for any school stupid enough to consider him.

I think it is safe to say that Kyle Flood will never be a CFB coach again.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT