the idea of compiling a team of transfers is a recipe for disaster...evidence of that this year. In the meantime the freshmen do not get to play because they have to sit and it takes forever for them to develop.
Im down on the program because it hasnt been relevant in 12 years..thats a long time
thanks for your honesty and I have no reason to call you a hater, just a pessimist that has trouble thinking RU can improve.
As for relevant the last 12 years
It might not have been one of the top programs and missed a few NCAA invites , but it was a pretty good program that didn't have a lot of institutional support and had to rely on its HC's name to bring in the players, because its facilities wasn't going to.
2008–09 Rutgers 21–13 9–7 7th
NCAA Sweet Sixteen
2009–10
Rutgers 18–15 9–7 T-6th
NCAA First round
2010–11 Rutgers 20–13 11–5 4th
NCAA Second Round
2011–12 Rutgers 20–13 10–6 6th
NCAA First round
2012–13 Rutgers 16–14 7–9 T-9th
Rutgers Scarlet Knights (American Athletic Conference) (2013–2014)
2013–14 Rutgers 28–9 12–6 4th
WNIT Champions
Rutgers Scarlet Knights (Big Ten Conference) (2014–present)
2014–15
Rutgers 23–10 12–6 5th
NCAA Second Round
2015–16
Rutgers 19–15 7–9 8th
WNIT Second Round
2016–17
Rutgers 6-24 3-12 14th
2017–18
Rutgers 20–12 7–9 9th
edit: I do agree that building on transfers is not a good way to make a top 25 program, but filling holes quickly while the younger players get adjusted to the college game makes bringing transfers in sometimes a good idea.
To much of it is a problem , if it keeps sophomores and juniors from playing time