Here's the problem. He regurgitates a lot of the science and most of it is reasonably accurate, but he goes off the rails when he says it's just a bad flu with an infection fatality ratio of 0.1% and dismissing 220K eventual deaths (not sure where he even gets that as we're at 190K and likely to be close to 300K by the end of the year vs. 34K in a typical flu year, so no, this ain't the flu for the 1000th time) as being like the 1957 flu pandemic.Amazing thread by Gummibear that counters Numbers claim. Hey guess what you dont own science
Read and Share Twitter Threads easily!
Thread Reader helps you read and share the best of Twitter Threadsthreadreaderapp.com
He probably doesn't even know that the US under Maurice Hilleman (future great at Merck) developed a vaccine in record time back then and deployed it just as it was hitting and this likely saved a few hundred thousand lives (~100K died in the US from that pandemic) - and we don't have a vaccine yet, so assuming this will be like 1957, where we had a vaccine and that everything is fine now is ludicrous.
The Man Who Beat the 1957 Flu Pandemic
Pioneering virologist Maurice Hilleman, who is little remembered today, also helped develop nine of the 14 children’s vaccines that are now recommended
blogs.scientificamerican.com
I may not own science, but I certainly know more about it than any source you've posted from yet.